FROM COLONIAL RULE TO NATIONHOOD: AMÍLCAR CABRAL'S THOUGHT IN THE FACE OF THE MOZAMBIQUE PEACE ACCORDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0726.12Keywords:
Peace Agreements, Amílcar Cabral, Frelimo, Independence, Mozambique, Nation, Peace, RenamoAbstract
This research investigates, in a critical and interpretative way, how Amílcar Cabral's political thought could dialogue with the Mozambican peace process, culminating in the Peace Accords (Rome, in 1992, and Maputo in 2014 and 2018). Starting from an in-depth analysis of the central categories of Cabralismo - especially liberation as a continuous process, the centrality of political consciousness, revolutionary ethics, and the relationship between popular power and the state - the study confronts these principles with the historical, social, and political dynamics that shaped the end of the civil war in Mozambique. Through the question "what would Cabral say about the Peace Accords without Mozambique", the research seeks to understand the extent to which the Peace Accords, inserted in disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programs under the tutelage of multilateral institutions, respond or enter into tension with Cabral's vision of structural transformation and post-colonial emancipation. Through an interdisciplinary approach that combines African political theory, contemporary history, and critical discourse analysis, a hypothetical but grounded reading of what Cabral might have said about national reconciliation, the role of parties, social reintegration, and the challenges of building the Mozambican nation characterized by twenty-one ethnic groups in the post-decolonization period is proposed. The research concludes that Cabral's thought offers relevant conceptual tools to reassess the limits and potentialities of negotiated peace in Mozambique, illuminating contemporary debates on sovereignty, democracy, and social justice in the African context.
