HYBRID ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITIONS IN MACAO SAR: BETWEEN NAPOLEONIC AND CHINESE ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITIONS

Authors

  • JOÃO CARLOS CORTESÃO FARIA https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7986-175X
  • ANABELA RODRIGUES SANTIAGO https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-0323

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0126.2

Keywords:

Administrative traditions, Macao SAR, One Country, Two Systems, Napoleonic and Chinese tradition

Abstract

Macao is a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, governed by the principle of ‘One Country, Two Systems’. With a Portuguese historical legacy lasting more than 400 years, which continued until December 1999, we consider that the Region has a very particular model of public administration and is undergoing a gradual process of administrative reform, which is the subject of this article. Its public administration is not limited to a linear continuation of the Portuguese period, nor is it a simple transposition of the administrative model of the People's Republic of China; rather, it is a hybrid configuration, in which the Napoleonic legacy (of Portuguese origin) provides a resilient legal-administrative support, recontextualized by a post-1999 political-administrative logic associated with the Chinese administrative tradition (of Confucian origin). The results point to a configuration in which the legal and administrative support remains predominantly Napoleonic (legalism, uniformity, legal and administrative control mechanisms), while the political logic shows Confucian traits (centrality of the executive, vertical accountability and primacy of stability). We conclude that Macao exhibits a relatively stable hybrid model, resulting from the coexistence and recombination of distinct (but also similar) administrative traditions, with incremental adaptations that preserve the inherited legalistic basis and simultaneously reinforce political coordination mechanisms typical of the Chinese context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

JOÃO CARLOS CORTESÃO FARIA, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7986-175X

He is an Invited Assistant Lecturer at the School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic of Leiria (Portugal). He is currently a doctoral candidate in Public Administration at the Institute of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lisbon, where he is supported by an FCT–CCCM doctoral fellowship (ISCSP-ULisboa). His research is funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the Macau Scientific and Cultural Centre Doctoral Grant (PRT/BD/154975/2024). His scholarly interests lie at the intersection of public administration, governance, and the evolving institutional dynamics linking Portugal, Europe, and the Lusophone world.

ANABELA RODRIGUES SANTIAGO, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-0323

She holds a PhD in Public Policies from the University of Aveiro. She is a Researcher at the Centre for International Studies (CEI) of Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Portugal) and an external researcher at GOVCOPP (Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies), University of Aveiro. Her work focuses on global governance, international policy diffusion, and the European Union’s scientific diplomacy toward the Global South, including Africa, Asia, and Latin America. She is an active member of COST Action SiDnet – Science in Diplomacy Network, where she contributes to the development of analytical frameworks for understanding EU scientific diplomacy. In addition, she is a member of COST Action CHERN – China in Europe Research Network (WG1), through which she has participated in several international research missions and training initiatives, including: i) a scientific mission mapping Chinese investments in the agri-food sector (University College Cork); ii) the CHERN Training School China Scholarship and Policy Advice: Reaching Out to Policy-makers (European Commission, Brussels); and iii) a scientific mission mapping Chinese health-related projects associated with the Belt and Road Initiative in Europe (University College London). Her research portfolio reflects a sustained engagement with contemporary geopolitical, economic, and diplomatic relations between Europe and China, as well as broader transformations in global governance.

Published

2026-02-11