OBSERVARE
Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL15 N2, TD3
Thematic Dossier Internationalization of Higher Education:
Experiences and Challenges
June 2025
VOL16 N1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
DOI https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0325
Editorial. Presentation and Framing Şefika Şule Erçetin e Luis Tomé pp. 2-5
ARTICLES
Development of information literacy in history and civic education as a 21st- century
leadership skill - Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor & János Setényi pp. 6-19
Multicultural Perspectives and Global Leadership in Higher Education - Pusat Pilten &
Gülhiz Pilten pp. 20-35
Management Styles and Organizational Intelligence. Level of Higher Education
Administrators - Dilek Yörük pp. 36-51
Digital Tools In Second Language Learning In Higher Education: A Systematic Review Of
Recent Research - Seçkin Esen pp. 52-63
The European Higher Education Alliances: the challenges of transnational university
cooperation - Concepción Anguita Olmedo pp. 64-84
Higher Education from an Inclusive Governance Perspective: Expanding the Boundaries
of Social Justice - Nilay Neyişçi pp. 85-99
Nurturing and Upbringing; the Forgotten Aspect in Curriculum Development and
Implementation at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) - Miiro Faroq & Baguma K. Grace
pp. 100-116
Exploring Plasma Leadership in Turkish Universities: A Document-Based Administrative
Perspective - Handan Ege & Şefika Şule Erçetin pp. 117-132
Globalizing the Indian Higher Education: A Critical Appraisal - Vesselin Popovski & Rajat
Shandilya pp. 133-149
Internationalization of Higher Education and Public Policy: Advances and Setbacks in the
Strategic Actions for the International Integration of Brazilian Universities - Jackson
Bentes & José Alberto pp. 150-163
An Examination and Validation of Social And Emotional Learning Skills Among University
Students in Uganda - Miiro Farooq pp. 164-189
OBSERVARE
Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 16 Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier Internationalization of Higher Education:
Experiences and Challenges
June 2025
2
EDITORIAL
ŞEFIKA ŞULE ERÇETIN
sefikasule@gmail.com
Professor and Dean of the Faculty of Education at Hacettepe University (Türkiye). In 1991, she
completed her Phd from Division of Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning, and
Economics in Hacettepe University. She has been working as a professor since 2003. She has
worked as visiting scholar in Texas A&M, USA and Lancaster University, UK. In 2021, she
founded Management of Higher Education Division and Master program in Hacettepe University.
Prof. Erçetin has worked in many national and international projects as a member of project
team project coordinator on education of refugees, women, vocational training. Her main
research fields are comparative education policies, research methods, organizational intelligence
and stupidity and wisdom, leadership, migration, fuzzy logic, children at risk, women and peace
studies, quantum leadership, women leadership model. Also, she is the president and founder
member of the International Science Association in Türkiye (ISCASS). She is the editor in chief of
different national and international journals which focuses on leadership and education.
LUIS TOMÉ
ltome@autonoma.pt
Full Professor at Autónoma University of Lisbon, UAL (Portugal), where he is Head for
Internationalization and Director of the Department of International Relations. He is also Director
of the research unit OBSERVARE-Observatory of Foreign Relations, and of Janus.net, e-journal of
international relations. Senior Researcher at the Portuguese Institute of International Relations
(IPRI-Nova). Member of the Thematic Assessment Committee of the Portuguese Agency for
Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES) in the scientific field of Political Science
and International Relations. Professor Luis Tomé has been a visiting professor at La Sapienza
Universitá di RomaItaly, the University of Macau-China, the Middle East Technical University
(METU) of Ankara- Türkiye, National Defense Institute of East Timor, as also at the Portuguese
Military University Institute (IUM), National Defense Institute (IDN) and Higher Institute of Police
Sciences and Homeland Security (ISCPSI). He has a degree in International Relations from the
Autónoma University of Lisbon (UAL), a Masters in Strategy from the Institute of Social and
Political Sciences (ISCSP) of Lisbon University and a PhD in International Relations from the
Faculty of Economics of University of Coimbra (FEUC).
How to cite this editorial
Erçetin, Şefika Şule & Tomé, Luís (2025). Editorial - Presentation and Framing. Janus.net, e-journal
of international relations. Janus.net, e-journal of international relations. VOL 16 Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges, June
2025, pp. 2-5. DOI https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0325ED.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 16 Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 2-5
Editorial Şefika Şule Erçetin, Luís Tomé
3
EDITORIAL
PRESENTATION AND FRAMING
ŞEFIKA ŞULE ERÇETIN
LUIS TOMÉ
In recent decades, the internationalization of higher education has emerged as a central
theme in global academic discourse. As universities and academic institutions around the
world increasingly operate beyond national borders, the need to examine the
implications, practices, and outcomes of internationalization has become both urgent and
complex. Internationalization, in the context of higher education, refers not only to the
mobility of students, faculty, and academic programs, but also to the integration of
international dimensions into curricula, research agendas, institutional strategies, and
campus cultures. It encompasses policies and practices designed to enhance global
engagement, foster intercultural understanding, and prepare graduates to operate in
increasingly interconnected societies. However, internationalization is not a neutral or
universally beneficial process. It reflects broader dynamics of globalization, power
relations, economic inequalities, and cultural negotiations that shape how it is
experienced and implemented across different contexts. Effective leadership in this
context must not only enable global engagement but also prioritize equity, diversity, and
ethical responsiveness to global challenges.
While internationalization remains a cornerstone of higher education reform, it is
increasingly entangled with broader structural challenges that institutions worldwide
must address. What was once predominantly framed by national systems and local
priorities is now significantly influenced by international pressures and transnational
governance frameworks. The rise of global university rankings, cross-border knowledge
economies, international accreditation mechanisms, and digitally mediated academic
mobility has profoundly reshaped both the strategic aspirations and organizational
configurations of universities.
Contemporary higher education operates within a dynamic and often volatile global
landscape shaped by intersecting technological, social, political, and demographic
transformations. In this climate of accelerated change, Artificial Intelligence and digital
transformation are exerting growing influence over pedagogical practices, administrative
processes, and knowledge production. These developments require not only technological
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 16 Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 2-5
Editorial Şefika Şule Erçetin, Luís Tomé
4
adaptation but also conceptual rethinking. Within this framework, the concept of
quantum leadership has emergeda non-linear, holistic, and adaptive approach aligned
with the complex realities confronting internationally engaged universities.
The expanding international responsibilities of universitiesparticularly in domains such
as climate change, migration, peace-building, and global citizenshipnecessitate a
reexamination of the core missions of higher education. Universities are increasingly
expected to serve as agents of social transformation, embedding internationalization
within broader goals of equity, sustainability, and human development. While these
responsibilities entail complex challenges, they also present compelling opportunities for
fostering intercultural dialogue, enhancing global competencies, and driving societal
innovation on a global scale. Through inclusive governance structures that are
participatory, reflective, and ethically grounded, higher education institutions can
respond to global imperatives while modeling values-based leadership in times of
uncertainty.
This thematic dossier, titled Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and
Challenges, brings together a series of eleven scholarly articles that explore the
multifaceted nature of internationalization in higher education, offering critical insights
into its driving forces, lived realities, and the pressing challenges it entails. It features
contributions that interrogate both the opportunities and tensions inherent in the
internationalization process. Rather than conceptualizing internationalization as a fixed
policy model, this issue examines it as a fluid, context-sensitive process intersecting with
digital transformation, demographic transitions, geopolitical volatility, and institutional
complexity.
By integrating theoretical, empirical, and practice-oriented perspectives, this issue
advances a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of internationalization in a
post-pandemic, AI-mediated, and globally uncertain era. Beyond identifying disruptions
and contradictions, the contributions underscore the resilience, creativity, and
adaptability of higher education institutions. Examples include the proliferation of globally
integrated hybrid programs, enhanced international research collaborations, and the
widespread adoption of learner-centered digital pedagogies. These developments
illustrate the transformative potential of internationalization to stimulate institutional
innovation, nurture global citizenship, and build inclusive academic communities.
The articles compiled in this dossier approach the theme from a variety of disciplinary,
methodological, and geographical perspectives. Indeed, the authors come from diverse
academic fields ranging from Education Sciences to International Relations, and from
Law to Public Administration and are affiliated with various higher education
institutions across different countries, including Bulgaria, Brazil, Spain, Hungary, India,
Kazakhstan, Portugal, Türkiye, and Uganda. Together, they aim to contribute to a deeper
understanding of how internationalization unfolds in practice, what it means for students,
educators, and institutions, and how it can be navigated responsibly and ethically.
In bringing together these varied contributions, this dossier does not seek to provide
definitive answers but to open space for critical dialogue. It underscores the importance
of viewing internationalization not as an abstract ideal or a one-size-fits-all strategy, but
as a contested and evolving process that must be examined in context. As institutions
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 16 Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 2-5
Editorial Şefika Şule Erçetin, Luís Tomé
5
continue to grapple with shifting geopolitical realities, technological change, and
reconfigurations of academic life, the questions raised in this dossier are more relevant
than ever.
As co-editors of this thematic dossier, we are deeply grateful to all 18 authors who
generously agreed to share their knowledge, experiences, and perspectives through the
eleven articles that follow. Gratitude is also extended to the scientific reviewers, whose
recommendations contributed to further enhancing the quality of the articles, as well as
to the entire editorial team of the esteemed scientific journal Janus.net, which is
responsible for publishing this thematic dossier. To all, our heartfelt thanks for the honor
and privilege of your collaboration in this truly collective and transnational endeavor.
This issue invites scholars, administrators, and policymakers to engage critically and
constructively with the values, structures, and strategies shaping the future of higher
education. The focus extends beyond navigating uncertainty to envisioning and building
sustainable, equitable, and forward-thinking models of global academic engagement. We
invite readers to engage with the articles that follow with an open and critical mindset,
and to reflect on how internationalization can be reimagined in ways that enrich higher
education while advancing global responsibility, equity, and mutual learning.
OBSERVARE
Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier Internationalization of Higher Education:
Experiences and Challenges
June 2025
6
DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION LITERACY IN HISTORY AND CIVIC
EDUCATION AS A 21ST-CENTURY LEADERSHIP SKILL
ÁRON FEKETE
aron.fekete@mcc.hu
PhD, Mathias Corvinus Collegium (Hungary). Learning Institute, Project Manager
RICHÁRD FODOR
fodor.richard@mcc.hu
Mathias Corvinus Collegium, Learning Institute, Head of Research (Hungary). Pázmány Péter
Catholic University, Lecturer
JÁNOS SETÉNYI
janos.setenyi@mcc.hu
PhD, Mathias Corvinus Collegium, Learning Institute, Director (Hungary)
Abstract
The information revolution of the 21st century brought several significant changes in the field
of education, among many the spread of WEB 2.0, MOOC systems and artificial intelligence
ultimately further blurring the line between the digital-analogue world. In this context history
and civic education have become even more significant, giving information and media literacy
a more prominent role. It should be the role of teacher training institutes to prepare future
educators to tackle challenges and build on new opportunities. The concept of digital
citizenship appears in the literature and curricular development goals, which also implies the
ethical, responsible and safe possession and application of digital literacy and media literacy
competences in both secondary and tertiary education (Erdem et al, 2022). Our study explores
the relationship between media literacy, digital literacy and digital citizenship competences in
the field of history and civic education. During the content analysis of the literature, global
and EU strategy reports, we examined the most important challenges and objectives
formulated in the topic. The results include the increasing role of information and media
literacy since the 2010s, the approaches to citizenship education and a model of the key
concepts in the title in the form of a competence network.
Keywords
Information Literacy, Media Literacy, Civic Education, Digital Pedagogy, Disinformation,
Leadership Skills.
Resumo
A revolução informacional do século XXI provocou transformações profundas no domínio da
educação, entre as quais se destacam a disseminação da Web 2.0, a emergência dos sistemas
de ensino massivo aberto online (MOOC) e o avanço da inteligência artificial, contribuindo
para esbater ainda mais a fronteira entre os mundos digital e analógico. Neste novo
paradigma, as áreas da História e da Educação para a Cidadania assumem uma relevância
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 6-19
Development of Information Literacy in History and Civic
Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill
Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor, János Setényi
7
acrescida, conferindo à literacia informacional e mediática um papel central no
desenvolvimento das competências vicas dos cidadãos. Por conseguinte, compete às
Instituições de Ensino Superior dotar os futuros professores das ferramentas necessárias para
enfrentarem os desafios e explorarem as oportunidades proporcionadas pelas novas
tecnologias e práticas educativas. O conceito de cidadania digital encontra-se amplamente
representado na literatura especializada, bem como nos objetivos de desenvolvimento
curricular, implicando a aquisição e aplicação ética, responsável e segura das competências
associadas à literacia digital e mediática, tanto no ensino secundário como no ensino superior.
O presente estudo analisa a inter-relação entre literacia mediática, literacia digital e
competências de cidadania digital no âmbito do ensino da História e da Educação para a
Cidadania. Com base na análise de conteúdo da literatura relevante e dos relatórios
estratégicos, tanto a vel global como da União Europeia, identificam-se os principais desafios
e metas delineados nesta área. Os resultados evidenciam, entre outros aspetos, o papel
crescente da literacia informacional e mediática desde a década de 2010, as abordagens
contemporâneas à educação para a cidadania e um modelo conceptual dos temas em estudo,
estruturado sob a forma de uma rede de competências interligadas.
Palavras-chave
Literacia da Informação, Literacia dos Meios de Comunicação Social, Educação vica,
Pedagogia Digital, Desinformação, Competências de Liderança.
How to cite this article
Fekete, Áron, Fodor, Richárd & Setényi, János (2025). Development of Information Literacy in
History and Civic Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill. Janus.net, e-journal of international
relations. Thematic Dossier - Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges.
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1. June 2025, pp. 6-98. DOI https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0325.1.
Article submitted on 7 April 2025 and accepted for publication on 2 May 2025.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 6-19
Development of Information Literacy in History and Civic
Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill
Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor, János Setényi
8
DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION LITERACY IN HISTORY AND
CIVIC EDUCATION AS A 21ST-CENTURY LEADERSHIP SKILL
ÁRON FEKETE
RICHÁRD FODOR
JÁNOS SETÉNYI
Introduction
Over a quarter of a century, the 21st century has witnessed an abundance of
technological innovations that have profoundly impacted both education and society at
large. The digital sphere and various algorithms are not only capable of influencing
elections (e.g., the Cambridge Analytica scandal) or inciting violence against religious
minorities (Harari, 2024), but also significantly facilitate the translation of texts,
plagiarism, and access to information. It is therefore unsurprising that attitudes toward
artificial intelligence among educators and researchers span a broad spectrumfrom
techno-optimism to outright rejection (Zompetti et al., 2024). Due to the pace of
technological advancement, some scholars have begun to replace the notion of digital
literacy with that of AI literacy, which emphasizes the critical and reflective use of artificial
intelligence (Long & Magerko, 2020). In this study, however, we do not distinguish
between AI literacy and media literacy, as both encompass the ethical, responsible, and
safe acquisition and application of digital competencies (Erdem et al., 2022).
The COVID-19 pandemic changed global conditions and highlighted the critical role of
leadership in navigating uncertainty, transformation, and chaos. In this new reality,
leadership increasingly demands skills like information literacy, enabling individuals to
access, evaluate, and apply information responsibly amid rapid change. As part of the
essential toolkit for 21st-century digital citizenship, information literacy empowers
leaders to make informed decisions and foster resilient, adaptable communities (Erçetin
& Açıkalın, 2025).
Although studentsoften referred to as digital nativesare immersed in digital media
daily, they frequently lack the sub-skills essential for responsible and deliberate
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 6-19
Development of Information Literacy in History and Civic
Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill
Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor, János Setényi
9
technology use. For educators, the absence of adequate training often poses a significant
challenge in fostering both their own and their students’ digital competencies. On a more
positive note, recent years have seen a shift toward the integration of digital citizenship
into educational curricula, particularly within the field of civic education. This integration
aims to equip students with fundamental competencies for engaging in the digital sphere,
such as ethicsthat is, appropriate, safe, and responsible internet use information and
media literacy, political and civic participation, and the capacity for critical resistance
(Moonsun, 2016). Accordingly, this paper examines the educational policy objectives and
pedagogical practices that have emerged regarding digital literacy, history education,
and citizenship education, both in Hungary and in international contexts.
Theoretical background
The concept associated with information literacy is now nearly half a century old (Tóth,
2024), and as such, it has undergone numerous revisions over the past decades.
Although several attempts have been made to establish a unified definition, no
universally accepted interpretation has emerged. Nonetheless, the ongoing discourse has
drawn attention to the fundamental aspects of the field (Leaning, 2017). Accordingly,
most authors define the concept as the competent use of technology, information, and
its sources, as well as critical thinking skills (Koltay & Szőke-Milinte, 2020; Fedorov &
Mikhaleva, 2020; Rahim, A. & Indah, M., 2024). These foundational understandings of
information literacy provide a crucial framework for interpreting contemporary
developments in the digital age. As the sociotechnical landscape continues to evolve, it
becomes increasingly important to reassess how these core competencies are applied in
practice. The growing complexity of digital environmentsshaped by algorithms, artificial
intelligence, and the proliferation of online contentdemands an expanded perspective
on what it means to be information literate in the 21st century.
Information and Media Literacy in European Policy Documents and
Educational Guidelines
Following the turn of the millennium, the growing impact of technological development
on education and the labor market became almost immediately noticeable within the
European Union. One of the first signs of this was that, in 2002, the European Training
Foundation and the European Council assigned the application of information and
communication technologies among the key competences (Bognár, 2002; Szabó, 2023).
From 2003 onward, these changes also began to emerge in the educational systems of
several Central European countries at that time not yet EU members including
Hungary. In Hungary, the National Core Curriculum already incorporates digital
competencies to be developed within the subject of history, focusing on skills related to
recognizing, retrieving, and evaluating information (Fekete, 2025).
A significant milestone in this trajectory was the Paris Declaration of 2015, in which
educational actors identified four priority areas for education: (1) fostering social, civic,
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 6-19
Development of Information Literacy in History and Civic
Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill
Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor, János Setényi
10
and intercultural competences; (2) promoting critical thinking and media literacy; (3)
improving the education of disadvantaged children; and (4) promoting intercultural
dialogue (European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Eurydice, 2016).
The European Council's framework for the development of digital competence,
DigCompEdu, includes information and media literacy among the key competences.
Developed by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, the
DigCompEdu framework was first introduced in 2013 and updated in 2017 to reflect the
changing needs of European citizens. (Fodor, 2024)
In March 2019, the Second Survey of Schools: ICT in Education was conducted at the
request of the European Commission to examine the use of digital technologies in EU
education systems, based on data from 400 schools per country. As a follow-up to the
2011 study, the longitudinal analysis showed progress in several areas over eight years.
The report also identified a model called Highly equipped and connected classroom’
establishing three scenarios with costs of technological equipment, network and
professional development for educators of EU classrooms (European Commission,
Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, 2019).
The survey identified several key issues, such as the lack of skills of both students and
educators concerning digital content development, the absence of thorough in-service
and pre-service training for teachers, of whom only 12% had a proper ICT course at
university. Analysis of Hungarian data from the survey also highlighted this obstacle.
Following COVID and the distance learning period in Hungary the education government
implemented a reform in teacher training. The new policies brought compulsory courses
and programmes related to both majors of teacher candidates
1
, alongside general digital
instructional support and information literacy courses introduced. The new programmes
are already present at universities, however, institutions are autonomous in developing
their own approaches and strategies.
One of the most significant outcomes of the EU Commission survey was the lack of
disciplinary models adaptable by teachers (European Commission, Directorate-General
for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, 2019). It is clear that there are
general principles and ideas for digital redefinition of analogue learning (Puentedura,
2013) while pedagogical background is also set for learning and teaching (European
Commission, 2021). On the other hand, both theoretical models and practical methods,
techniques, tasks and platforms of digital learning in separate disciplinary contexts are
still scarce with only handful of explorers in the field of history education (Breakstone et
al, 2021; Cantabrana et al. 2022; Hajdarović, 2023).
1
Hungarian teacher trainees must choose two majors (e.g. history and a foreign language) which are studied
parallel psychological and education related courses for five years including several field practices organised in
schools.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 6-19
Development of Information Literacy in History and Civic
Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill
Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor, János Setényi
11
Changing role and toolkit of civic education
Although citizenship education has been a foundational element of schooling, the
emergence of the digital citizen marks a contemporary shift in how civic identity is
understood and promoted in educational theory and policy. Since its development in the
17th century, the roles and objectives of citizenship education have gone through
countless stages of development in response to changing challenges in Europe and
Hungary in particular.
The conscious and intentional education of the civic community was reintroduced after
ancient times, the Enlightenment and it was developed further with the formation of
nation-states. It played a prominent role in the enlightened absolutist monarchies of
Central Europe. In Hungary, it appeared in curricula and classrooms as Historical
geography, later with the title of History and Social studies, as Constitutional studies and
as Foundations of our worldview during the period of the communist dictatorship (Kaposi
2019; Jakab, 2019).
Gábor Halász identifies the rediscovery of the need for civic education after the fall of
communism in Central Europe as the interplay of several factors. First, the end of Eastern
European dictatorships and emerging difficulties of young democracies, the phenomena
of globalisation, the acceleration of European integration, and the experience of the
ethnic-nationalist civil war reappearing in Europe (Halász, 2005). The subject of
citizenship education was introduced as a compulsory subject in England in 2002 after a
long process that began in the 1990s, based on the work of the British professor Bernard
Crick (Advisory Group on Citizenship, 1998). Independent thinking, activity, critical, and
objective student attitudes played an emphatic role in the emerging civic competence,
which sees the role of student participation not in the future, but already in the present
(Kaposi, 2019).
Joel Westheimer and Joseph Kahne (2004) identify three distinct stages of citizenship:
the (1) personally responsible citizen, the (2) participatory citizen, and the (3) justice-
oriented citizen. The personally responsible citizen is characterised by adherence to laws
and social norms, personal responsibility within the community, and generally positively
characterised acts such as working, paying taxes, recycling, donating blood, or
volunteering in times of crisis. The participatory citizen goes a step further, engaging
actively in civic life by joining community organisations, initiating projects to support
those in need, or fostering economic development. This model assumes a deeper
understanding of how governmental institutions function. At the highest level of this
framework stands the justice-oriented citizen, who critically examines social, political,
and economic structures. Rather than focusing solely on surface-level problems, this ideal
citizen seeks to understand underlying systemic issues, identify injustices, and engage
with democratic movements aiming for structural change.
Moonsun (2016) also introduces three approaches to citizenship education: (1) traditional
(or national), (2) critical, and (3) digital. The traditional model focuses on clearly defined
social and economic rights and duties, through which individuals become "good citizens"
by conforming to national expectations. The critical model emerged in response to civil
rights movements in the United States, emphasising the development of multicultural
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 1, TD1
Thematic Dossier
Internationalization of Higher Education: Experiences and Challenges
June 2025, pp. 6-19
Development of Information Literacy in History and Civic
Education as a 21st-Century Leadership Skill
Áron Fekete, Richárd Fodor, János Setényi
12
and global identities and giving voice to ethnic, linguistic, religious, and cultural
minorities. The third and most recent stage is digital citizenship, which reflects the
transformative impact of digital technologies on civic life. Moonsun (2016) outlines four
core competencies for digital citizens: (1) ethical, safe, and responsible internet use; (2)
information and media literacy; (3) civic and political engagement; (4) critical resistance.
In the framework proposed by Erdem et al. (2022), digital citizenship supports the
higher-order dimensions of citizenship education. Moving beyond earlier models that
focused primarily on normative behaviour, contemporary citizenship now encompasses
cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills as well. Thus, citizenship education is
undergoing a significant transformation. It no longer solely concerns legal and social
responsibilities or conformity to civic norms. Instead, it now incorporates digital
behaviours shaped by the Web 2.0 environment and promotes the development of
interconnected digital competencies.
According to the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), digital
citizenship involves students' ability to recognise the rights, responsibilities, and
opportunities of living, learning, and working in an interconnected digital and analogue
world. It entails acting in safe, legal, and ethical ways (ISTE, 2023). ISTE standards
emphasise that digitally literate students understand the implications of their online
presence, the significance of digital security, and the risks of data collection technologies.
They are equipped to use digital tools ethically, respect intellectual property rights, and
share information responsibly.
Fodor et al. (2023) highlight the diverse nature of both history and citizenship education
in a comparative analysis of national regulatory frameworks. Among 16 European and
Asian countries
2
all of the European nations have compulsory civic education without
compulsory school leaving examination in the subject. On the other hand, declared
objectives of development vary greatly from country to country. Education for democratic
values and ideas are shared by all analysed curricula, but explicit further goals as
sustainability, and financial knowledge vary. Among the countries of the research only
Checzia, Hungary, Ireland, Austria, China and Turkey highlight digital competence and
information literacy development (Fodor, Tõhn, Máté, 2023).
The COVID pandemic and the unsettling American political events focused global
attention on the threats of misinformation. The European Commission has published a
Digital Educational Action Plan for the period 2021-2027, which aims to support digital
citizenship by developing digital literacy and tackling misinformation.
The main findings of the report include: (1) A significant number of initiatives on this
topic take a technological approach to digital literacy and pay little attention to critical
thinking. (2) Awareness of the role and dangers of the media is still low among teachers
and parents. (3) Information literacy and digital competence development are not
emphasised in the training of teachers in Europe.
2
Armenia, China, Czechia, England, France, Hungary, Ireland, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Poland, Scotland,
Slovakia, Turkey.