OBSERVARE

Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº.1, TD4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026

286

SOVEREIGNTY UNDER CONSTRUCTION: AMÍLCAR CABRAL AND THE

RECONFIGURATION OF LUSOPHONE COUNTRIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL

SYSTEM

EUGÉNIO COSTA ALMEIDA

eugenio.luis.almeida@iscte-iul.pt | elcalmeida@gmail.com

He holds a PhD in Social Sciences, specializing in International Relations from the Instituto

Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas of the Technical University of Lisbon (ISCSP-UTL). He is

affiliated with the University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL) and serves as a Collaborating

Researcher at the Centre for International Studies (CEI-IUL, Portugal). He is also a Senior

Associate Researcher at CEDESA (Centre for Studies on the Economic and Social Development of

Africa) and the Angola Research Network (ARN), as well as an Associate Researcher at the

Research, Development and Innovation Centre of the Portuguese Military Academy (CINAMIL),

within the Military University Institute, Lisbon. His research focuses on International Relations,

African politics and security, Lusophone Africa, geopolitics, and strategic

studies. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1259-5764

Abstract

Under the title "Sovereignty under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of

Lusophone Countries in the International System", this article examines the theoretical

evolution and contemporary applications of sovereignty in the Portuguese-speaking African

countries (PALOP), focusing on the intellectual and political legacy of Amílcar Cabral. It analyses

how classical Western notions of sovereignty - from popular sovereignty theories to the

Westphalian state-centric model - were reinterpreted by anti-colonial thought to construct an

endogenous framework of national liberation. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative,

historical-analytical approach anchored in critical conceptual reconstruction, thematic content

analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis across Cabral’s core primary texts and contemporary

diplomatic literature. Mobilizing Samir Amin’s structural critique of unequal development, the

paper demonstrates that political independence without economic "delinking" resulted in an

"unfinished sovereignty" marked by peripheral integration into the global capitalist system.

Finally, it explores how PALOP states currently navigate this structural tension, leveraging

variable geometry and strategic autonomy across multilateral arenas (CPLP, ECOWAS, SADC,

UN) to assert their agency in an emerging multipolar order.

Keywords

Amílcar Cabral; CONCP; Sovereignty; Self-Determination; PALOP; Decolonization.

Resumo

Sob o título " Soberania em Construção: Amílcar Cabral e a Reconfiguração dos Países Lusófonos

no Sistema Internacional", este estudo examina a evolução teórica e as aplicações

contemporâneas do conceito de soberania nos Países Africanos de Língua Oficial Portuguesa

(PALOP), articuladas com o legado intelectual e político de Amílcar Cabral. Analisa-se como as

noções ocidentais clássicas de soberania - das teorias da soberania popular ao modelo

estatocêntrico de Vestfália - foram reinterpretadas pelo pensamento anticolonial para refundar

uma práxis endógena de libertação nacional. Metodologicamente, o estudo adota uma

abordagem qualitativa e histórico-analítica fundamentada na reconstrução concetual crítica, na

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

287

análise temática de conteúdo e na Análise Crítica do Discurso do corpus documental de Cabral

e da literatura diplomática contemporânea. Recorrendo à crítica estrutural de Samir Amin sobre

o desenvolvimento desigual, o trabalho demonstra que a independência política formal sem

"desconexão" económica gerou uma "soberania inacabada", marcada pela integração periférica

no sistema capitalista global. Por fim, investiga-se como os estados dos PALOP negoceiam

atualmente esta tensão estrutural, mobilizando a geometria variável e a autonomia estratégica

em fóruns multilaterais (CPLP, CEDEAO, SADC, ONU) para afirmar a sua agência num sistema

internacional crescentemente multipolar.

Palavras-chave

Amílcar Cabral; CONCP; Soberania; Autodeterminação; PALOP; Descolonização.

How to cite this article

Almeida, Eugénio Costa (2026). Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the

Reconfiguration of Lusophone Countries In The International System. Janus.net, e-journal of

international relations. Thematic Dossier – Geopolitics of Anxiety: Ideology, Identity, and

(Un)Bordering in Contemporary Europe and Asia, VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD4, October 2026, pp. 286-308.

DOI https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0726.13

Article submitted on 29 July 2026 and accepted on 14 August 2026.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

288

SOVEREIGNTY UNDER CONSTRUCTION: AMÍLCAR CABRAL AND

THE RECONFIGURATION OF LUSOPHONE COUNTRIES IN THE

INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM

EUGÉNIO COSTA ALMEIDA

Introduction

African decolonization constituted one of the most transformative processes of the

twentieth-century international order. The downfall of European colonial empires

profoundly altered the configuration of the international system, enabling the emergence

of new sovereign states and expanding the number of actors within multilateral

institutions. Among the various national liberation movements of this period, those in the

Portuguese colonies stand out due to the longevity of their armed conflicts, Portugal’s

fierce resistance to decolonization, and the intellectual depth of the leadership guiding the

anticolonial struggle. Within this context, Amílcar Cabral occupies a unique position.

Recognized as a revolutionary leader, political strategist, and theorist, Cabral developed

an original reflection on national liberation, culture, sovereignty, and development that

extended far beyond the immediate context of Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde. His

influence resonated across other African liberation movements - notably in Angola and

Mozambique - and remains a key reference point for understanding the challenges faced

by post-colonial African states (Chabal, 2002; Mendy, 2019). The literature on Cabral

highlights distinct dimensions of his legacy: Patrick Chabal (2002) underscores his ability

to articulate revolutionary theory with political practice; António Tomás (2007) emphasizes

his intellectual trajectory and strategic vision; and Peter Mendy (2019) frames him as one

of the most significant Pan-African thinkers of the twentieth century. These interpretations

converge on a central insight: Cabral’s originality lies in his seamless integration of cultural

identity, political emancipation, and economic transformation.

This study builds upon the premise that Cabral’s paradigm of "unity and struggle" extended

well beyond the military dimension of liberation. It posits that Cabral formulated a

conceptual framework of sovereignty understood as an ongoing process of political,

economic, and cultural assertion. This perspective is crucial for analysing the trajectory of

Declaration of Interest - The author declares that there are no known financial, professional, or personal conflicts

of interest that could have appeared to influence this research. The author has no competing interests to declare.

Acknowledgment - The author acknowledges the use of Microsoft Copilot in assisting with the formatting of

references and the standardization of source citations in this work.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

289

the Portuguese-Speaking African Countries (PALOP) and their persistent challenges within

a contemporary international system marked by power asymmetries, economic

interdependence, and shifting multipolarity.

Accordingly, this analysis addresses two interconnected questions: to what extent did

Cabral’s thought and political action shape the state-building processes and international

standing of Lusophone African nations? And do the contemporary structural challenges of

the PALOP reflect an incomplete sovereignty, or are they manifestations of global dynamics

affecting post-colonial states universally? This article argues that Cabral was not merely a

liberation leader, but the conceptual architect of a distinct African model of sovereignty.

The obstacles these states face today do not signal the failure of the Cabralian project;

rather, they reflect enduring international structures of dependency that render

sovereignty a continuous process of negotiation.

Methodologically, this study adopts a qualitative, historical-analytical approach anchored

in critical conceptual reconstruction and contextual political theory (Skinner, 2002;

Koselleck, 2004). Rather than treating Amílcar Cabral’s writings as a static or formal

academic construct, the research subjects his core primary corpus—encompassing political

speeches, programmatic pamphlets, and strategic essays—to systematic thematic analysis

(Bardin, 2018) and Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2013). This methodological

framework allows for the interrogation of how Cabral’s strategic discourse was

operationalized during the anti-colonial liberation struggle and how its ideological

imperatives continue to project onto contemporary post-colonial state-building, regional

integration, and foreign policy architectures in Lusophone Africa (Yin, 2018).

Additionally, the author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to master's student Nicolai

R. (Boston University) for his valuable bibliographical assistance, particularly in facilitating

online access to copies of key works and reference materials that were essential to the

consolidation of this study.

Theoretical Framework: Sovereignty, Post-Colonialism, and African

Agency

Analysing Amílcar Cabral’s contributions requires an interdisciplinary conceptual

framework situated at the intersection of History, Political Science, and International

Relations. This study anchors its analysis in three core concepts: Westphalian vs.

substantive sovereignty, post-colonial structural continuity, and African agency.

Traditionally conceptualized since the Peace of Westphalia (1648)

, as absolute, supreme

authority exercised within a bounded territory, sovereignty has long functioned as the

foundational pillar of the modern international system. However, international relations

scholars, such as Krasner (1999, cited in Gonçalves, 2017), have demonstrated that

"Westphalian sovereignty" rarely manifests in absolute terms, being continuously

compromised by economic, military, and political interdependencies. In post-colonial

The “Peace of Westphalia” refers to the treaties signed in 1648 in Münster and Osnabrück, which concluded the

Thirty Years' War in Europe. It established the foundational principles of the modern international order,

centered on territorial sovereignty, non-intervention in internal affairs, and formal legal equality among states.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

290

Africa, this dichotomy between de jure statehood and de facto autonomy acquired severe

systemic dimensions. Inheriting arbitrary colonial frontiers, extractive economic

structures, and bureaucratic apparatuses designed for subjugation rather than

governance, newly independent states achieved legal recognition without proportional

decision-making autonomy. This structural contradiction prompted foundational critiques

of formal sovereignty by thinkers such as Kwame Nkrumah and Samir Amin, who posited

those neocolonial mechanisms — ranging from monetary dependency to asymmetrical

trade patterns - covertly constrained post-colonial states from charting self-determined

developmental trajectories (Mango, 2023; Paulo, 2026).

Post-colonial theory further complicates this landscape by analyzing how colonial power

structures endure within state-building processes. Achille Mbembe (2001) argues that the

post-colonial condition rarely marks a clean historical rupture; rather, it represents a

complex entanglement of colonial continuities and institutional transformations. In

Lusophone Africa, scholars such as José Luís Cabaço (2007), Severino Ngoenha (2004),

and Carlos Lopes (2019) have extended these debates by linking identity formation,

political economy, and state legitimacy. Lopes (2019), in particular, stresses that

overcoming inherited structural vulnerabilities requires African nations to systematically

convert their indigenous political and material assets into leverage within the international

political economy.

Concurrently, the analytical shift toward "African agency" in contemporary International

Relations challenges orthodox perspectives that reduce post-colonial states to passive

objects of Great Power competition. As Chipaike and Knowledge (2018) observe, agency

emphasizes the capacity of African actors to negotiate international constraints, shape

multilateral agendas, and assert strategic autonomy. It is precisely within this framework

that Amílcar Cabral’s intellectual and diplomatic legacy proves visionary. Decades prior to

the formalization of "African agency" in international relations discourse, Cabral

demonstrated how a subaltern liberation movement could systematically mobilize

transnational solidarity, influence multilateral organizations such as the United Nations,

and alter global normative frameworks regarding anti-colonial resistance. Consequently,

analysing the Cabralian project requires an approach that balances structural constraints

with transformative agency, framing sovereignty not as a static legal grant, but as an

ongoing process of political assertion and negotiation.

“Unity and Struggle”: The Cabralian Theory of Sovereignty

The political thought of Amílcar Cabral stems from a foundational imperative: establishing

the theoretical and material conditions that allow colonized peoples to reclaim their

historical agency. Although literature frequently emphasizes his leadership of the armed

struggle conducted by the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cabo Verde

(PAIGC)

(Comitini, 1980), his conceptual contribution extends far beyond military

The origins of the PAIGC (Partido Africano para a Independência da Guiné e Cabo Verde) can be traced to the

African Independence Party and Liberation Front of Guinea and Cabo Verde (Frente de Libertação da Guiné e

Cabo Verde – FLGCV). The founding charter of the FLGCV was signed on 19 September 1959 by Abel Djassi

(Amílcar Cabral's nom de guerre) and Zain Lopes (also known as Rafael Barbosa), among others; see Casa

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

291

strategy. Rather than presenting a formal, codified academic doctrine, Cabral’s political

writings implicitly challenge the classical Westphalian paradigm of sovereignty (Krasner,

1999, cited in Gonçalves, 2017). Through an analytical reconstruction of his primary works,

his framework can be understood as resting upon four interwoven pillars: historical agency,

political emancipation, economic autonomy, and cultural assertion (AHS, n.d.; Vecchi,

2020). While Cabral did not formalize this taxonomy into a rigid system, these dimensions

articulate a holistic vision of self-determination.

The foundational concept of "unity and struggle" - which served as the central principle of

the PAIGC - synthesizes this broader paradigm. Cabral maintained that no anti-colonial

movement could achieve meaningful liberation without constructing political cohesion

capable of transcending ethnic, regional, and socio-economic divisions (Cabral, 1984, pp.

19, 46). This formulation departed significantly from romanticized nationalist currents that

posited the nation as a pre-existing, static entity. Conversely, Cabral conceptualized the

nation as a dynamic political project under continuous construction, forged through

collective mobilization against colonial subjugation. As Patrick Chabal (2002) observes,

this position reflected a sophisticated understanding of the socio-cultural fabric of

Portuguese Guinea. Recognizing that colonial governance relied heavily on

instrumentalizing ethnolinguistic fractures to suppress collective resistance, Cabral argued

that national unity could not be administratively decreed; it had to develop organically

through political conscientization and popular participation.

The centrality of culture constitutes a cornerstone of Cabralian political thought. In his

seminal 1970 address at Syracuse University, Cabral famously asserted that "national

liberation is necessarily an act of culture" (Cabral, 2020; Santos, 2020). This proposition

marked a major shift within post-colonial studies by expanding the scope of liberation

beyond state-centric and military parameters. As Maria do Carmo Santos (2020)

highlights, Cabral recognized that colonial domination functioned not merely through

territorial annexation or economic extraction, but through the systematic erosion of

indigenous cultural matrices. Consequently, cultural resistance represented far more than

a defensive preservation of tradition; it functioned as an active, strategic reinterpretation

of history to construct autonomous futures. Expanding on this point, António Tomás (2007)

argues that Cabral’s cultural thesis avoided both essentialist nostalgia and abstract

universalism. Rather than conceptualizing African culture as homogeneous or immutable,

Cabral understood it as a dynamic product of historical conditions, emphasizing that

revolutionary political strategies had to adapt continuously to localized material realities.

Crucial to the Cabralian theory of sovereignty is its critique of post-colonial elite formation.

Cabral harboured deep concern that newly emerging ruling classes would replicate colonial

modes of exploitation upon inheriting the state apparatus. In his landmark 1966 address

at the Tricontinental Conference in Havana, he famously called upon the revolutionary

petty bourgeoisie to commit "class suicide" - to renounce its structural privileges and align

its material interests directly with the popular masses (Almada, 2023). As Peter Mendy

(2019) observes, this imperative sought to prevent the institutionalization of post-colonial

oligarchies and ensure that formal independence translated into substantive socio-

Comum, Folder 07056.003.004, Title: "Carta da FLGCV"

(http://casacomum.org/cc/arquivos?set=e_2617#!e_2774).

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

292

economic transformation. While contemporary scholars acknowledge the idealistic

dimensions of this expectation, its diagnostic relevance remains acute in light of the

governance crises and elite capture that affected numerous African states in subsequent

decades.

Finally, Cabral’s reflection incorporates an international dimension that directly informs

modern foreign policy studies. Rejecting narrow autarkic nationalism, Cabral recognized

that liberation unfolded within a global political economy structured by asymmetrical power

relations (Goulart, 2024). Liberation was therefore simultaneously a domestic imperative

and an international negotiation. The strategic alliances constructed by the PAIGC with the

Organization of African Unity (OAU), the United Nations, and Third World solidarity

networks demonstrated the practical deployment of this vision. Sovereignty, in Cabral’s

formulation, was not synonymous with isolationism; rather, it signified the capacity to

engage the international system autonomously while safeguarding national strategic

interests. By synthesizing culture, political economy, institutional legitimacy, and foreign

policy, the Cabralian paradigm provides a comprehensive framework for examining the

ongoing state-building trajectories and international assertion of the PALOP in the twenty-

first century.

Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde: From Liberation to State-Building

The liberation struggle led by the PAIGC represents one of the most comprehensively

examined historical instances of anti-colonial resistance in twentieth-century Africa.

Nevertheless, conceptualizing the Guinean experience solely through a military lens

obscures the analytical depth of the state-building model crafted by Amílcar Cabral and his

leadership. Founded in 1956, the PAIGC emerged within an international and domestic

context defined by the Portuguese Estado Novo regime’s rigid refusal to concede self-

determination to its overseas territories. Grounded in the official doctrine of a

"pluricontinental and multiracial nation," the colonial state explicitly denied the legitimacy

of African nationalist claims, systematically closing constitutional avenues for political

emancipation and driving anti-colonial movements toward armed resistance.

The Pidjiguiti massacre of August 1959 - in which colonial authorities violently suppressed

striking dockworkers in Bissau - marked a decisive turning point in this trajectory. The

incident demonstrated to the PAIGC leadership the impossibility of securing self-

determination through exclusive peaceful protest (Cabral, 1984). Consequently, the

movement systematically mobilized for armed resistance, formally initiating military

operations in 1963 (Comitini, 1980). However, the movement’s strategic effectiveness

stemmed less from military superiority than from its premature institutionalization of state

functions within the "liberated zones." Under PAIGC administration, these areas

established schools, primary healthcare centers, agricultural production cooperatives, and

popular tribunals (Cabral, 1984; Cabral, 2016, pp. 99–100; Chabal, 2002). Unlike

contemporary insurgencies that focused resources predominantly on guerrilla warfare, the

PAIGC constructed an operational alternative state apparatus that generated domestic

political legitimacy long before de jure independence was attained.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

293

Crucial to this institutionalization process was the strategic prioritization of education.

Cabral maintained that genuine sovereignty required an educated citizenry capable of

driving socio-economic transformation and executing state functions (Cabral, 1984, pp.

255–257). Schools within the liberated zones served dual purposes: providing basic

literacy and fostering national consciousness that transcended ethnic identities. This

structural preparation culminated in the unilateral proclamation of the independence of

Guinea-Bissau in September 1973 at Madina do Boé (Caldeira, 2024). Although Portugal

recognized Guinean independence only following the Carnation Revolution of April 1974,

the PAIGC had already secured substantial international recognition. On November 2,

1973, United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/3061 (XXVIII) formally

recognized the sovereign state of Guinea-Bissau (UN, 1973), representing a major

diplomatic triumph that validated Cabral’s doctrine of linking military control to multilateral

legitimization.

Concurrently, the Cabo Verdean trajectory exhibited distinct socio-geographical

characteristics. The archipelago's insular geography and demographic specificities

precluded the replication of mainland guerrilla warfare strategies. Nevertheless, Cabral’s

overarching political framework guided nationalist mobilization across the islands. The

attainment of Cabo Verdean independence in July 1975 reflected the strength of the

clandestine political networks established over preceding decades, combined with

international diplomatic pressure favoring decolonization.

The initial post-independence era exposed the acute structural challenges inherent to post-

colonial state-building. Severe resource scarcity, administrative deficits inherited from

colonial rule, and hostile international economic conditions constrained the immediate

realization of the PAIGC’s socio-economic agenda. Despite these impediments, the

governance frameworks of both Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde remained deeply shaped

by the Cabralian intellectual lineage. As Julião Soares Sousa (2007) argues, the endurance

of the Cabralian legacy resides in its integration of pragmatic political strategy with a long-

term vision of structural transformation. Rather than providing transient tactical

guidelines, Cabral’s political thought articulated a comprehensive doctrine of nation-

building that continues to frame governance debates across Lusophone Africa.

The Systemic Impact on Lusophony: The Spillover Effect in Angola and

Mozambique and the Fall of the “Estado Novo”

The victorious insurrection and subsequent state consolidation in Guinea-Bissau under the

intellectual aegis of Amílcar Cabral did not unfold in isolation, nor did its implications

remain confined to the West African theatre. On the contrary, the Guinean experience

functioned as the strategic fulcrum and catalyst for a systemic process of attrition that

irreversibly undermined the political, economic, and military foundations of the Portuguese

colonial empire (Gomes, 2020). The internationalist coordination among national liberation

movements across Portuguese colonies achieved institutional form with the founding of

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

294

the Conference of Nationalist Organizations of the Portuguese Colonies (CONCP)

established during a historic summit in Casablanca in 1961 (BNP, 2016).

Under Cabral’s theoretical and diplomatic leadership - as its primary conceptual

formulator—the CONCP developed into a permanent platform for transcontinental political-

diplomatic coordination and strategic intelligence sharing. This alliance unified the

programmatic agendas of the PAIGC, the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola

(MPLA), the Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO), and the Movement for the Liberation

of São Tomé and Príncipe (MLSTP). Through this collective framework, these movements

projected a unified voice in international forums, effectively neutralizing Lisbon’s

diplomatic attempts to isolate the various combat fronts or portray anti-colonial forces as

fragmented transnational insurgencies. While the ultimate collapse of the Portuguese

colonial regime resulted from a complex convergence of economic exhaustion,

international isolation, and military fatigue, Cabral’s strategic direction of the CONCP

served a pivotal catalytic role. This influence was notably highlighted during the landmark

Dar-es-Salaam meeting in October 1965, documented in the "CONCP – 2ème Conférence

des Organisations Nationalistes des Colonies Portugaises – Résolutions" (CONCP, 1965),

which concretely demonstrated the collective political and military alignment led by Cabral,

as synthesized below.

Through the institutional mechanism of the CONCP, Cabral succeeded in universalizing his

revolutionary methodology, generating a profound spillover effect, strategic emulation,

and mutual solidarity across the Angolan and Mozambican fronts. The influence of his

framework on prominent leaders—most notably António Agostinho Neto in Angola and

Samora Moisés Machel in Mozambique—was structured around three core doctrinal and

operational vectors that reconfigured the nature of Lusophone African nationalism:

i. Liberation as a Total Social Revolution: Decolonization was conceptualized not as the

mere "Africanization" or administrative replacement of colonial personnel, but as the

structural transformation of inherited socio-economic relations. It demanded the

dismantling of feudal, colonial, and capitalist modes of production that sustained human

exploitation in both agrarian and urban spheres.

ii. Subordination of the Military Wing to Political Leadership: The armed struggle and

tactical operations were strictly subordinated to the ideological direction and

programmatic objectives of the political party. This principle reflected Cabral’s explicit

The Conference of Nationalist Organizations of the Portuguese Colonies (Conferência das Organizações

Nacionalistas das Colónias Portuguesas – CONCP) was founded on April 18, 1961, in Casablanca, Morocco. It

had its roots in the African Revolutionary Front for the National Independence of the Portuguese Colonies

(Frente Revolucionária Africana para a Independência Nacional das Colónias Portuguesas – FRAIN), established

in 1960 in Tunisia. The CONCP represented Angola, through the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola

(Movimento Popular de Libertação de Angola – MPLA); Guinea-Bissau and Cape Verde, through the African

Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC); Mozambique, initially through the National

Democratic Union of Mozambique (União Democrática Nacional de Moçambique – UDENAMO ) ad later through

the Mozambique Liberation Front (Frente de Libertação de Moçambique – FRELIMO); São Tomé and Príncipe,

through the Committee for the Liberation of São Tomé and Príncipe (Comité de Libertação de São Tomé e

Príncipe – CLSTP), subsequently the Movement for the Liberation of São Tomé and Príncipe (Movimento de

Libertação de São Tomé e Príncipe – MLSTP); and Portuguese India (Goa), with representation and support

from Goan nationalists, particularly prior to the territory's integration into the Indian Union.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

295

directive to "combat the craze for militarism and make every combatant an exemplary

militant of our Party" (PAIGC, 1969, p. 5).

Civic, Trans-Ethnic, and Anti-Racist Nationalism: Cabralian doctrine rejected

ethnolinguistic, regional, or racialized divisions, promoting instead the historical forge of

an anti-colonial civic identity—the political and anthropological emergence of the African

"New Man" (Neto, 1975; Machel, 1974)

Table 1. Cabral’s leadership within the CONCP and Its contribution to the collapse of Portuguese

Colonialism (1961–1974)

Source: Author based on CONCP (1961), Cabral (1973), and Chabal (2002)

This Cabralian paradigm generated an internal ideological friction between "modernizers"

and "traditionalists" within Afro-Lusophone liberation movements (Pinto, 2001, p. 87).

While the "modernizers" endorsed a universalist, progressive political vision—as

formulated by Cabral—the "traditionalists" remained tied to localized traditional authority

structures. Both the PAIGC and FRELIMO successfully integrated or marginalized

traditionalist factions early in their struggles. In contrast, the MPLA faced a more

precarious dynamic in Angola due to acute internal factionalism. Nevertheless, all three

dominant movements ultimately aligned under the leadership of the "modernizers," who

increasingly adopted progressive, anti-imperialist, and Marxist-Leninist organizational

frameworks during the conflict (Pinto, 2001, p. 87).

This perspective was articulated by Agostinho Neto during the proclamation of Angolan independence on 11

November 1975 (Neto, 1975), and was similarly emphasized by Samora Machel during the swearing-in of

Mozambique's Transitional Government in 1974 (Machel, 1974).

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

296

In Mozambique, FRELIMO operationalized the Guinean model of "Liberated Zones" with

remarkable structural rigor across the northern provinces of Cabo Delgado and Niassa.

These regions were converted into social laboratories for popular self-governance,

women's emancipation, and collective agricultural production, effectively dismantling

Portuguese administrative and fiscal control (Machel, 1977, p. 54). In Angola, despite

severe internal fractures—exemplified by the rivalry between the MPLA, Holden Roberto’s

National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA), and Jonas Savimbi’s National Union for the

Total Independence of Angola (UNITA), which was exacerbated by Cold War geopolitics—

the MPLA’s intellectual leadership consistently drew upon Cabral’s theoretical corpus to

assert its political legitimacy and formulate its vision of a secular, progressive state.

The systemic impact of Cabralian praxis extended fundamentally to the metropole itself.

Portugal's prolonged engagement in asymmetric counter-insurgency operations across

three simultaneous theatres devoid of military resolution precipitated severe economic

strain, societal destabilization (manifested through mass draft evasion and emigration),

and the moral erosion of the Estado Novo regime. Young officers within the Portuguese

armed forces, confronted daily with the tactical resilience, logistical sophistication, and

political coherence of the PAIGC in Guinea-Bissau, increasingly engaged with anti-colonial

literature and political manifestos within their garrisons (Almada, 2019).

The Movimento dos Capitães (Captains' Movement), which orchestrated the revolutionary

coup of April 25, 1974, in Lisbon—overthrowing the dictatorship of Marcello Caetano and

establishing Portuguese democracy—was directly catalyzed by this epistemological shift.

The explicit acknowledgment by senior military figures, such as General António de Spínola

in his seminal work Portugal e o Futuro (Spínola, 1974), that the colonial crisis admitted

only a political and democratic resolution, derived directly from the strategic stalemate

imposed by the PAIGC on the ground. Consequently, within the framework of

interconnected global history, the restoration of democracy in Portugal and the sovereign

emancipation of Lusophone African nations emerge not as isolated events, but as twin

dimensions of a single historical process of universal liberation (Almada, 2019).

The Reconfiguration of the Lusophone Space after Decolonization

The independence of the Portuguese colonies in Africa catalysed a profound transformation

in the political configuration of the Lusophone world. Prior to 1974, the official doctrine of

portugalidade (Portuguese identity) was intrinsically tied to imperial discourse, projecting

a political community hierarchy centred upon the metropole. Decolonization rendered this

imperial logic entirely unsustainable, compelling a fundamental redefinition of bilateral and

multilateral relations between Portugal and the newly emerging African states. This

transition did not proceed in a linear fashion; rather, it was marked by structural tensions,

historical ambiguities, and complex negotiations that reflected both the heavy weight of

colonial legacies and the imperatives of the post-colonial international order.

This post-imperial reconfiguration unfolded within a highly volatile global environment.

Achieving statehood during the height of Cold War geopolitical rivalries, the newly

independent Portuguese-Speaking African Countries (PALOP) - Guinea-Bissau, Angola,

Cabo Verde, Mozambique, and São Tomé and Príncipe - frequently found themselves

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

297

transformed into arenas of superpower competition. Despite these systemic constraints,

the PALOP systematically sought to assert their strategic autonomy. Admission to the

United Nations represented a pivotal threshold in this trajectory, providing these states

with de jure legal recognition and formal access to multilateral decision-making bodies. As

post-colonial scholars such as Achille Mbembe (2001) observe, independence represented

a dual reality of structural rupture and institutional continuity: while colonial political

apparatuses were formally dismantled, inherited vulnerabilities - including mono-crop

economic dependency, fragile administrative structures, and external geopolitical pressure

- persisted under new post-colonial dynamics, as detailed in Table 2.

Table 2. Macroeconomic Insertion Matrix and Structural Indicators in the PALOP and an

Additional CPLP State

Source: Author based IMF (2026), UNCTAD (2025), and Mo Ibrahim Foundation (2024)

Concurrently, this structural transition created new avenues for regional and international

cooperation. The Portuguese language - historically deployed as an instrument of colonial

administration - was progressively reinterpreted and reclaimed by African states as a

medium for sovereign dialogue, diplomatic concertation, and multilateral engagement.

This evolution culminated in 1996 with the establishment of the Community of Portuguese

Language Countries (CPLP). The creation of the CPLP represents one of the most visible

expressions of the post-colonial reconfiguration of Lusophone international relations,

establishing an intergovernmental platform explicitly founded upon principles of sovereign

equality, non-interference, and mutual cooperation.

Although the CPLP is frequently subjected to academic scrutiny regarding its institutional

limitations and execution capacities, the organization plays a meaningful role in

consolidating mechanisms for political consultation and enhancing the collective diplomatic

leverage of its member states. For the PALOP, the platform provides an additional

institutional mechanism to amplify their international visibility and exercise collective

agency within broader multilateral forums. Evaluated through the lens of the Cabralian

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

298

legacy, this evolutionary trajectory is of notable conceptual interest: Cabral consistently

advocated for a sovereignty that was outward-looking and integrated into global dynamics,

yet firmly grounded in the political autonomy and self-determination of African peoples.

The construction of collaborative frameworks among equal, sovereign states stands fully

aligned with this original vision.

The PALOP in the Contemporary International System: Between

Multilateralism and Strategic Assertion

The international integration of the PALOP constitutes one of the most significant

dimensions of the post-colonial evolution of the Lusophone space. Upon achieving

independence, these states confronted a structural challenge extending far beyond

domestic institutional consolidation: asserting their sovereignty within an international

system characterized by acute economic, technological, and military asymmetries. While

political independence secured formal international legal recognition, it did not

automatically dismantle the structural constraints inherited from colonial rule. As

conceptualized by Samir Amin (1974, apud Chambisso, 2025), the historical integration of

African economies into the capitalist world-system occurred from peripheral positions,

structurally conditioning their pathways for autonomous development. This vulnerability

became acutely evident across the PALOP, whose national economies remained heavily

reliant on primary commodity exports and external development assistance.

To navigate these structural limitations, the PALOP developed diversified strategies of

international insertion, prioritizing active engagement within multilateral institutions.

Participation in the United Nations system proved vital from the outset. Multilateralism

provided new post-colonial states with an institutional framework where the principle of

sovereign equality partially counterbalanced material power asymmetries. Within the UN,

the PALOP have consistently advocated for multilateral governance reform, self-

determination, and equitable sustainable development—a diplomatic orientation deeply

rooted in their anti-colonial liberation struggles, during which international solidarity

proved indispensable for legitimizing claims to self-determination. Key historical

milestones within this framework included UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of

14 December 1960 ("Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries

and Peoples") and the establishment of the Special Committee on Decolonization

(Committee of 24) via Resolution 1654 (XVI) of 27 November 1961 (Santos, 2009).

Crucially, diplomatic support was mobilized through the Organization of African Unity

(OAU, now the African Union) alongside an extensive transnational network of non-

governmental, political, and solidarity organizations. These included Portuguese anti-

fascist and anti-colonial opposition channels—such as the Casa dos Estudantes do Império

(CEI); the Portuguese Communist Party (PCP); the Patriotic Front for National Liberation

(Frente Patriótica de Libertação Nacional – FPLN), founded in Rome in 1962 and

headquartered in Algiers; and the Portuguese Socialist Action (Acção Socialista Portuguesa

– ASP), founded in 1964 by figures such as Mário Soares. Institutional and humanitarian

assistance was further channelled through official bodies—such as the Development

Assistance Committee of the Council of Europe (indirectly via Swedish development aid)—

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

299

and multilateral agencies like UNICEF, which executed direct assistance programs in

PAIGC-controlled liberated zones. Furthermore, a wide array of international non-

governmental organizations actively supported the cause, including The Angola Comité in

the Netherlands; the Committee for Freedom in Mozambique, Angola and Guinea (CFMAG)

in the United Kingdom, closely affiliated with the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM); and the

Organization of Solidarity of the People of Asia, Africa and Latin America (OSPAAAL), based

in Havana.

In the post-colonial era, active participation in African regional integration mechanisms

represents a foundational pillar of the PALOP’s foreign policy architectures. Angola and

Mozambique play strategic roles within the Southern African Development Community

(SADC), contributing to regional security and economic integration. Guinea-Bissau and

Cabo Verde participate in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), with

Cabo Verde simultaneously leveraging its geographic positioning to strengthen

transatlantic partnerships with both West African and Atlantic structures. This multi-

layered institutional integration illustrates a defining feature of contemporary global

politics: overlapping regionalism and diplomatic multi-alignment. Rather than operating

exclusively within a single institutional domain—whether the CPLP, the African Union, or

the United Nations—the PALOP strategically articulate distinct diplomatic identities tailored

to their national security and economic priorities.

The establishment and expansion of the Community of Portuguese Language Countries

(CPLP) in 1996 must be conceptualized within this broader framework of diplomatic multi-

alignment. Although the organization possesses modest resource capacities compared to

traditional regional blocks, it serves as an indispensable forum for political concertation,

normative consensus-building, and South-South technical cooperation. Scholarly literature

emphasizes that the geopolitical value of the CPLP derives not merely from its policy

outputs, but from its unique capacity to bridge sovereign states across four continents. For

the PALOP, the platform provides an additional diplomatic arena to project their strategic

interests, expand bilateral partnerships, and amplify their operational leverage within the

wider multilateral architecture.

Evaluated through a Cabralian theoretical lens, the engagement of the PALOP in

contemporary multilateral organizations represents the structural continuation of the

struggle for sovereignty through diplomatic instruments. If the primary objective during

the anti-colonial struggle was securing international recognition for national self-

determination, the post-colonial imperative has shifted to converting that formal statehood

into substantive strategic autonomy. In this sense, Cabralian praxis demonstrates that

sovereignty must never be conflated with autarkic isolation or passive non-alignment;

rather, it consists of the capacity to navigate complex global interdependencies

autonomously while safeguarding the national margin of political decision-making.

Unfinished Sovereignty? Dependence, Neocolonialism, and Multipolarity

Reflecting upon the sovereign trajectories of the PALOP requires a critical examination of

the structural challenges confronting these states within the contemporary global political

economy. Although political independence was secured half a century ago, persistent

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

300

vulnerabilities continue to evoke central debates articulated within the theoretical corpus

of Amílcar Cabral. Chief among these issues is the persistence of structural economic

dependence. Most African nations continue to occupy peripheral positions within the

international division of labor, remaining specialized in the extraction and export of primary

commodities while relying heavily on imported high-value-added manufactures. In his

seminal trilogy published between 1970 and 1990—Accumulation on a World Scale,

Imperialism and Unequal Development, and Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global

Failure—Samir Amin demonstrated that the core structural dilemma for former European

colonies lay in their merely "formal" independence. In practice, post-independence Africa

was subordinately integrated into the global capitalist system through a model of

dependent peripheral accumulation, wherein domestic industrialization—the essential

catalyst for any autonomous development project—was systematically marginalized

(Chambisso, 2025).

Citing Amin’s (1990, apud Chambisso, 2025) analysis in Maldevelopment, Chambisso

(2025) underscores the foundational thesis that 'political independence without economic

delinking is an illusion.' This formulation explains why numerous post-colonial African

states, despite winning legal statehood, rapidly confronted structural growth crises, acute

external dependence, and extreme vulnerability to international commodity price volatility.

What these political economies fundamentally lacked was what Amin (1990, apud

Chambisso, 2025) conceptualized as economic 'delinking' (déconnexion) to complement

formal political sovereignty. Within the PALOP context, this structural dynamic manifests

through distinct empirical vulnerabilities

− Angola: Represents a paradigmatic case of resource concentration, where historical

over-reliance on petroleum exports has dominated public revenues and foreign

exchange earnings. While oil revenues underwrote post-war national infrastructure

reconstruction, they simultaneously exposed the national economy to severe

international market shocks and hindered industrial diversification.

− Mozambique: Faces analogous structural pressures regarding massive offshore natural

gas reserves in the Rovuma Basin. While generating expectations of accelerated

macroeconomic growth, these discoveries have triggered intense scholarly concern

surrounding the "resource curse"—a dynamic wherein capital-intensive extractive

abundance fails to translate into inclusive socio-economic development or broad-based

institutional strengthening.

− Guinea-Bissau & Cabo Verde: Guinea-Bissau remains acutely dependent on mono-crop

cashew nut exports, leaving its fiscal stability subject to global market fluctuations,

while Cabo Verde confronts structural constraints inherent to small island developing

states (SIDS), including resource scarcity and high exposure to external economic and

environmental shocks.

Across these diverse national trajectories, the concept of neocolonialism retains profound

analytical purchase, capturing the continued capacity of external actors to condition

domestic political and economic policy horizons. Nevertheless, the twenty-first-century

international system exhibits structural dynamics markedly distinct from those of the mid-

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

301

twentieth-century anti-colonial struggle. The rise of emerging powers—most prominently

the People's Republic of China—has fundamentally altered the global distribution of power

and financial capital. The expanding Chinese footprint across Africa constitutes one of the

most intensely debated phenomena in contemporary international relations. Scholars such

as Alden (2005) argue that Chinese engagement offers African states unprecedented

strategic flexibility to diversify bilateral partnerships and mitigate historical dependencies

on former Western colonial powers. Conversely, critics caution against emerging modalities

of dependency associated with external debt sustainability and external control over

strategic physical infrastructure.

Simultaneously, alternative scholarly perspectives highlight the operational framework of

"co-evolutionary pragmatism" - a defining feature of China's contemporary African policy

- which fosters sectoral convergence across agriculture, physical infrastructure, and

environmental management. Under this pragmatic model, localized coordination

mechanisms deployed within one sector can generate positive cross-sectoral externalities

and alleviate systemic operational constraints in others (De, 2025). Parallel to this Asian

driver, the European Union maintains substantial engagement through development

cooperation, trade frameworks, and foreign direct investment, while non-traditional actors

- including the United States, India, Turkey, Brazil, and various Gulf states - have

systematically intensified their diplomatic and economic presence across the continent.

This burgeoning multipolarity creates simultaneous strategic opportunities and complex

policy trade-offs: while expanding foreign policy options for African decision-makers, it

exponentially increases diplomatic complexity and demands heightened national

negotiating capacity.

In this transformed geopolitical landscape, Cabralian theoretical reflections acquire

renewed analytical urgency. Cabral’s uncompromising emphasis on national political

autonomy, endogenous socio-economic development, and the expansion of the sovereign

decision-making capacity of African peoples provides an essential critical lens for

evaluating contemporary global power configurations. Rather than representing a static

historical threshold achieved once and for all in 1973 or 1975, sovereignty emerges in

Cabralian thought as an unceasing, dynamic process of political and economic

construction. To avoid an idealized or teleological reading of Cabral, however, it is

necessary to acknowledge that his normative framework encountered severe structural

frictions in historical practice. The post-colonial trajectories of the PALOP demonstrated

that anti-colonial revolutionary solidarity frequently fractured into authoritarian centralism,

acute institutional fragility, and persistent extra-regional dependencies, revealing a

profound historical gap between Cabral’s emancipatory projections and post-colonial

realpolitik.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

302

The Contemporary Relevance of Amílcar Cabral’s Thought in the Twenty-

First Century

More than five decades after Amílcar Cabral’s tragic assassination

, his theoretical and

programmatic legacy continues to occupy a central place in contemporary debates

surrounding state sovereignty, sustainable development, culture, and political

emancipation. This enduring presence results not merely from the historical significance

of his leadership during the anti-colonial war, but primarily from the remarkable capacity

of his theoretical corpus to provide analytical instruments for deciphering twenty-first-

century challenges. Fundamental to this lasting relevance is the multidimensional nature

of Cabralian reflection: Cabral never conceptualized national liberation as a single historical

event or a simple administrative transfer of power. Rather, liberation was formulated as a

continuous, multidimensional emancipatory continuum wherein formal political

independence constituted merely the prerequisite stage for structural economic

transformation, cultural re-grounding, and the active democratic participation of popular

masses in shaping their national Destiny.

This holistic perspective proves particularly incisive within contemporary debates on

African economic development. Over recent decades, numerous states across the

continent have recorded robust macroeconomic growth rates alongside deeper integration

into global markets. However, persistent structural deficits endure regarding severe socio-

economic inequalities, technological vulnerabilities, fiscal fragility, and institutional

weakness. As Carlos Lopes convincingly argues, the primary contemporary challenge for

African states consists of translating raw economic growth into sustainable, high-value-

added structural transformation (Lopes, 2019). This imperative display profound

conceptual affinities with Cabral’s insistence on binding economic development to the

internal buildup of technological capabilities, institutional consolidation, and national

productive autonomy.

Furthermore, Cabralian thought retains exceptional analytical purchase in addressing

contemporary crisis modalities of political governance. Throughout his writings, Cabral

maintained a vigilant critique of power concentration and the systemic risk of post-

independence ruling elites detaching themselves from the material interests of the popular

base. His rigorous critique of the national petite bourgeoisie remains strikingly prescient

in an era where multiple post-colonial polities navigate challenges associated with neo-

patrimonialism, systemic corruption, clientelism, and institutional fragility. In this context,

scholars emphasize the necessity of reclaiming indigenous African traditions of civic

participation and institutional accountability to fortify the democratic legitimacy of

contemporary state structures (Ngoenha, 2004, pp. 81–82). Although articulated within a

distinct historical moment, this normative reflection directly intersects with Cabral’s core

imperative: ensuring that sovereign statehood yields concrete socio-economic benefits for

the majority of the population.

In the realm of globalized culture and knowledge production, the Cabralian doctrine of

"returning to the source" and culture as an instrument of liberation has acquired renewed

Amílcar Cabral was assassinated on 20 January 1973 in Conakry, the capital of the Republic of Guinea (Guinea-

Conakry), directly outside his official residence within the PAIGC administrative complex in the city (Cabral,

1984, pp. 437–438).

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

303

theoretical urgency. While the intensification of global flows of information, capital, and

people have broadened avenues for intercultural exchange, it has simultaneously

heightened anxieties surrounding cultural homogenization, western hegemony, and the

peripheralization of local identities. Cabral’s defence of culture as the foundational matrix

of historical resistance continues to inspire contemporary discourse on cultural pluralism,

indigenous knowledge systems, and epistemological decolonization. As Achille Mbembe

observes, a central imperative for contemporary African thought consists of dismantling

representations inherited from the colonial episteme and asserting autonomous modes of

interpreting the world (Mbembe, 2001). This task directly echoes Cabral’s core premise:

asserting the historical capacity of African societies to produce critical knowledge and

formulate their own development paradigms.

Finally, the expanding scholarly focus on African agency in International Relations mirrors

the operational essence of Cabral’s political trajectory. For decades, traditional

international relations literature depicted African states as passive subjects, structurally

overdetermined by external superpower dynamics. Contemporary scholarship has

vigorously challenged this subaltern framing, demonstrating that African states, regional

institutions, and transnational movements actively shape global governance agendas.

Cabral’s diplomatic and revolutionary praxis stands as an exemplary historical model of

this agency. Through a sophisticated integration of grassroots mobilization, rigorous

intellectual production, and strategic international diplomacy, Cabral elevated a localized

liberation struggle into a globally recognized cause for human emancipation. In an

emerging multipolar order characterized by intense major-power competition, his

uncompromising insistence on both political self-determination and intellectual

independence offers an indispensable strategic compass for post-colonial states seeking to

navigate global interdependencies without surrendering their sovereign decision-making

power.

Conclusion

The comprehensive analysis developed throughout this study demonstrates that the

intellectual and political legacy of Amílcar Cabral extends far beyond the historical

boundaries of the anti-colonial liberation struggle that culminated in the independence of

Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde. While Cabral’s historical stature remains inextricably

bound to his strategic leadership of the PAIGC and the operational prosecution of the

national liberation war, the enduring significance of his work lies primarily in his

formulation of a holistic, multidimensional conception of state sovereignty—one capable of

integrating political, economic, cultural, and international systemic vectors. Grounded in

the fundamental premise that formal statehood does not exhaust the imperative of

national emancipation, Cabral constructed a dynamic theoretical corpus that continues to

offer vital analytical instruments for evaluating the post-colonial trajectories of the PALOP

and the structural challenges confronting African states within the contemporary global

order.

Central to this theoretical contribution is Cabral’s conceptualization of "unity and struggle,"

which operated not merely as a tactical slogan for military mobilization, but as an

integrated paradigm designed to solve the twin dilemmas of anti-colonial resistance and

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

304

post-colonial nation-building. By explicitly linking popular grassroots mobilization with

cultural re-grounding, agricultural diagnostic rigor, and institutional development, Cabral

established that true liberation demands the transformation of domestic productive

structures and the democratization of sovereign decision-making. Furthermore, as this

study has highlighted, Cabral’s ideational influence was never geographically confined to

Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde. His programmatic formulations and personal diplomacy

exerted a profound catalytic effect on the liberation movements of Angola (MPLA) and

Mozambique (FRELIMO), fostering a shared anti-colonial political culture across the African

Lusophone space. This transnational circulation of revolutionary theory and administrative

experience played a decisive role in shaping post-colonial state structures and laying the

groundwork for durable inter-state solidarity across the PALOP.

The examination of the international integration of the PALOP reveals that the attainment

of legal independence inaugurated an entirely new and complex phase in the struggle for

sovereign autonomy. If the primary objective during the anti-colonial era consisted of

securing international legal recognition for the right to self-determination, the post-colonial

imperative shifted toward asserting political and economic agency within a global

architecture characterized by acute structural asymmetries and peripheral capitalist

accumulation. Within this international setting, persistent challenges—such as primary

commodity dependence, fiscal vulnerability, institutional fragility, and major-power

geopolitical competition—continue to condition the practical exercise of national

sovereignty. The emerging multipolarity of the twenty-first-century international system

presents a double-edged reality: while expanding the spectrum of strategic partnerships

available to post-colonial states, it simultaneously heightens foreign policy complexity,

requiring increasingly sophisticated diplomatic strategies to safeguard national autonomy.

It is precisely within this contemporary geopolitical landscape that Cabralian thought

reasserts its profound theoretical urgency. Cabral’s uncompromising emphasis on national

political autonomy, endogenous socio-economic transformation, and epistemological self-

determination provides an essential conceptual compass for interpreting the structural

dilemmas facing the PALOP in the modern era. Far from representing a static historical

milestone sealed at the moment of decolonization, sovereignty emerges in Cabralian praxis

as an unceasing, dialectical process of political construction, institutional adaptation, and

strategic negotiation against both external structural constraints and internal post-colonial

frictions.

In the final analysis, the legacy of Amílcar Cabral remains exceptionally vital because it

serves as an unyielding reminder that the true emancipation of post-colonial societies

depends not merely on the capture of formal state apparatuses, but on the capacity to

erect legitimate democratic institutions, foster inclusive structural development, and

project autonomous agency within global power structures. His theoretical and practical

work therefore continues to constitute an indispensable reference point for understanding

contemporary African agency, the evolving geometry of South-South cooperation, and the

strategic positioning of Portuguese-speaking African states within the contemporary

international system.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

305

References

African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cabo Verde (PAIGC). (1969). Palavras

de Ordem Gerais do camarada AMILCAR CABRAL aos responsáveis do Partido (Novembro

de 1965). Edição da Comissão de Organização, Formação Política e Ideológica, Setembro-

1969. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/portugues/cabral/1965/11/40.pdf

Alden, Chris. (2005). China in Africa. Survival, 47(3): 147–164. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330500248086

Almada, José Luís Hopffer. (2023). O caso Amílcar Cabral. Apontamentos críticos a

propósito do princípio e do projecto da unidade Guiné-Cabo Verde. PARTE 1. Buala, 22

Janeiro 2023. Retrieved from https://www.buala.org/pt/a-ler/o-caso-amilcar-cabral-

apontamentos-criticos-a-proposito-do-principio-e-do-projecto-da-unidade-

Almada, Pablo. (2019). Uma transição pós-colonial? Aproximações do discurso do

Movimento das Forças Armadas (MFA) de Portugal aos movimentos de libertação colonial.

Revista Espacialidades. 2019.1, v. 15, n. 1: 206-205. Retrieved from

https://periodicos.ufrn.br/espacialidades/article/download/19198/12220/61140

Amílcar Cabral’s life, legacy and reluctant nationalism – An interview with António Tomás.

(2025, 12 September). Review of African Political Economy. Retrieved from

https://roape.net/2025/09/12/amilcar-cabrals-life-legacy-and-reluctant-nationalism-an-

interview-with-antonio-tomas-2/

Arquivo Histórico Social. (s.d.). Amílcar Cabral: Textos políticos (compilação). Instituto de

Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa. Retrieved from

https://www.marxists.org/portugues/cabral/ano/mes/51.pdf

Bardin, Laurence. (2018). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Lisboa. Edições 70.

BNP. (2016). A CONCP – a internacionalização da luta pela independência das colónias

portuguesas. (Conferência), Biblioteca Nacional Portuguesa. Retrieved from

https://www.bnportugal.gov.pt/index.php?view=article&id=1175

Cabaço, Jose Luis de Oliveira. (2007). Moçambique: identidades, colonialismo e libertação.

(PhD Dissertation) – Universidade de São Paulo. Repositório:

https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8134/tde-05122007-151059/

Cabral, Amílcar. (1973). Return to the Source: Selected Speeches. New York: Africa

Information Service & Monthly Review Press. Retrieved from https://abahlali.org/wp-

content/uploads/2016/12/amilcar_cabral_return_to_the_source-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf

Cabral, Amílcar. (1973). Return to the Source: Selected Speeches. New York: Monthly

Review Press

Cabral, Amílcar. (2016). Resistance and Decolonization. London. Rowman & Littlefield

International

Cabral, Luís. (1984). Crónica da Libertação (1ª ed.). Lisboa. Edições “O Jornal”.

Caldeira, Alfredo. (2024). Proclamação de independência da Guiné-Bissau. Comissão

Comemorativa 50 anos 25 Abril. Retrieved from

https://50anos25abril.pt/historia/proclamacao-da-independencia-da-guine-bissau/

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

306

Chabal, Patrick. (2002). Amílcar Cabral: Revolutionary Leadership and People's War.

London. Hurst & Co. Retrieved from

https://books.google.pt/books/about/Amilcar_Cabral.html?id=dpKndP09YjYC&redir_esc=

Chambisso, Celso. (2025). África: Independências Sem Emancipação Económica. Diário

Económico, 02/07/25. Retrieved from

https://www.diarioeconomico.co.mz/2025/07/02/economia/africa-independencias-sem-

emancipacao-economica/

Chipaike, Ronald & Knowledge, Matarutse H. (2018). The question of African agency in

international relations. Cogent Social Sciences, Volume 4, 2018 - Issue 1. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1487257

Comitini, Carlos. (1980). Amílcar Cabral – A Arma da Teoria. Rio de Janeiro. Editora

Codecri. Retrieved from https://afreekasite.wordpress.com/wp-

content/uploads/2018/03/a-arma-da-teoria-amilcar-cabral.pdf

CONCP. (1965). 2eme. Conference des Organizations Nationalistes des Colonies

Portugaises – Resolutions. Dar-es-Salaam, 3-9 Octobre 1965. Retrieved from

https://www.marxists.org/ubject/africa/paigc/concp-2nd.pdf

Fairclough, Norman. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.

London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Gomes, Patrícia G. (2020). Peter Karibe Mendy, Amílcar Cabral. Nationalist and Pan-

Africanist Revolutionary. H-Luso-Africa (July, 2020). https://www.h-

net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55386

Gonçalves, Isabela. (2017). O conceito de soberania: constantes e contradições. O

Cosmopolítico - v. 4 n.2 junho 2017. Retrieved from

https://periodicos.uff.br/ocosmopolitico/article/download/53755/31607/187069

Goulart, Pedro Vaz. (2024). Participation and Social Policies in Portugal under the Spectre

of Amílcar Cabral. Cadernos de Estudos Africanos (2024) 48: 71-81. Retrieved from

https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cea/article/view/40197

IMF. (2026). Regional Economic Outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa. International Monetary

Fund, April 2026. Retrieved from

https://www.imf.org/en/publications/reo/ssa/issues/2026/04/16/regional-economic-

outlook-for-sub-saharan-africa-april-2026

Koselleck, Reinhart. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Columbia.

New York. University Press

Lopes, Carlos. (209). Africa in Transformation: Economic Development in the Age of Doubt.

London. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01291-5

Machel, Samora. (1974).Mensagem ao Povo de Moçambique – por ocasião da tomada de

posse do Governo de Transição em 20 de Setembro de 1974. Porto. Edições

Afreontamento. Retrieved from

https://www.marxists.org/portugues/machel/1974/09/20.pdf

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

307

Machel, Samora. (1977). A Luta Continua: Antologia de Discursos. Maputo. Imprensa

Nacional de Moçambique.

Mango, Calido. (2023). Neocolonialism and Capitalism: a Sociopolitical Analysis of its

Impact on Third World's Development, Economy and Environment. Revista Cedepem,

Volume 2, No 2, ago./dez., 2022. Retrieved from

https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/cedepem/article/view/30905/21830

Mbembe, Achille. (2001). On the Postcolony. Berkeley, University of California Press.

https://www.hf.uio.no/ikos/english/research/news-and-

events/events/phd/2022/mbembe-on-the-postcolony.pdf

Mendy, Peter Karibe. (2019). Amílcar Cabral: A Nationalist and Pan-Africanist

Revolutionary. Athens: Ohio University Press.

Mo Ibrahim Foundation. (2024). 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance – Index

Report. Mo Ibrahim Foundation, October 2024. Retrieved from

https://mo.ibrahim.foundation/sites/default/files/2024-10/2024-index-report.pdf

Neto, Agostinho. (1975). “Discurso de Agostinho Neto na Proclamação da independência

de Angola”. Retrieved from https://jornadas50anos.tribunalconstitucional.ao/wp-

content/uploads/2025/01/DISCURSO-DE-AGOSTINHO-NETO-NA-PROCLAMACAO-DA-

INDEPENDENCIA-DE-ANGOLA.pdf

Ngoenha, Severino Elias. (2004). Os Tempos da Filosofia; filosofia e democracia

moçambicana. Maputo. UEM-Imprensa Universitária.

Paulo, Márcio. (2026). Kwame Nkrumah: Para pensar as lutas do Sul Global.

OutrasPalavras, 20/05/2026. Retrieved from

https://outraspalavras.net/descolonizacoes/kwame-nkrumah-para-pensar-as-lutas-do-

sul-global/

Pinto, António Costa. (2001). O Fim do Império Português: A Cena Internacional, a Guerra

Colonial, e a Descolonização, 1961-1975. Lisboa. Livros Horizonte

Santos, Aurora Almada e. (2009). O Comité de Descolonização das Nações Unidas e a

Legitimação da Luta Armada nas Colónias Portuguesas: 1965-1974. Associação Nacional

de História (ANPUH) – XXV Simpósio Nacional de História – Fortaleza, 2009. Retrieved

from https://anpuh.org.br/uploads/anais-simposios/pdf/2019-

01/1548772005_697ce39d0788e28863844d0e4f3f5197.pdf

Santos, M. do Carmo R. (2020). Amílcar Cabral: o pedagogo político-cultural das lutas

anticoloniais africanas. Portal Geledés, 08/03/20. Retrieved from

https://www.geledes.org.br/amilcar-cabral-o-pedagogo-politico-cultural-das-lutas-

anticoloniais-africanas/

Skinner, Quentin. (2002). Visions of Politics: Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge.

Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790812

Sousa, Julião Soares. (2007). Amílcar Cabra e a luta pela independência da Guiné e Cabo

Verde:1924-1973 (PhD Dissertation). Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Coimbra.

Repositório: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/7382

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 286-308

Sovereignty Under Construction: Amílcar Cabral and the Reconfiguration of Lusophone

Countries In The International System

Eugénio Costa Almeida

308

Sousa, Julião Soares. (2016). Amílcar Cabral (1924–1973): Vida e Morte de um

Revolucionário Africano. Lisboa. Vega.

Tomás, António. O Fazedor de Utopias: Uma Biografia de Amílcar Cabral. Lisboa: Spleen

Edições, 2007.

UNCTAD. (2025). Technical and statistical report: The State of Commodity Dependence

2025. United Nations, 2025. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-

document/ditccom2025d3_en.pdf

Vecchi, Roberto. (2020). A arma da teoria: pensamento africano e literatura. Veredas:

Revista da Associação Internacional de Lusitanistas, n. 33: 5–15, jan./jun. 2020. Retrieved

from https://revistaveredas.org/index.php/ver/article/view/587/477

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.,

(1984). Thousand Oaks. SAGE Publications.