OBSERVARE

Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº.1, TD4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026

130

FROM CULTURAL LIBERATION TO CREATIVE AND CULTURAL INDUSTRIES:

CABRAL’S LEGACY AND ECONOMIC AUTONOMY IN LUSOPHONE AFRICA

AMÉLIE LU YUQING

amelie.lu@163.com

Postdoctoral researcher at the University of Porto (Portugal), and holds a PhD from the Institute

for Research on Portuguese-speaking Countries, City University of Macau. She completed a

policy-oriented training course on “China and the Portuguese-speaking Countries in World Trade”

at the Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Portugal (2020). She holds a Master’s degree

in International Relations (French-taught) from the University of Provence Aix-Marseille I, France,

and a Bachelor’s degree in Political Economy from Jinan University, China. Her research interests

include cultural and creative industries, intercultural communication, gender studies, and global

consultancy within China’s Greater Bay Area. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7087-6796

Abstract

This research reconceptualizes Amílcar Cabral’s theory of “cultural liberation” by situating it

within the contemporary emergence of Creative and Cultural Industries (CCI) in Lusophone

Africa. Cabral argued that culture constitutes not only the foundation of collective identity but

also a driving force for political liberation. This proposition provides a critical theoretical

starting point for understanding how culture can be transformed from a resource of resistance

into a strategic pillar of post-colonial state building. Drawing on Frantz Fanon’s decolonial

theory, George Yúdice’s framework of the instrumentalization of culture, and Carlos Lopes’

discussions on Africa’s creative economy, this article conceptualizes culture as a field where

legitimacy, autonomy, and development intersect. Building on this perspective, the article

proposes an analytical framework that connects cultural identity, CCI, and economic

autonomy, extending Cabral’s concept of cultural liberation into contemporary post-colonial

development practices. Drawing on UNESCO, UNCTAD, ILO, Brookings, and country-level

evidence, the study examines Guinea-Bissau，Cabo Verde, São Tomé and Príncipe，

Mozambique and Angola to analyse how CCI function simultaneously as instruments of

economic diversification, platforms of identity consolidation, and arenas of geopolitical

positioning through language, media, music, and digital creativity. The paper argues that CCI

hold potential to contribute to economic autonomy by generating employment, strengthening

domestic value chains, expanding exportable symbolic capital, and reducing structural aid

dependency. However, adopting Cabral’s critical lens, the paper also interrogates whether CCI

genuinely advance decolonial transformation or risk integrating African cultural production

into new hierarchies of global cultural capitalism. Issues of commodification, dependency on

external markets, cultural homogenization, and unequal power dynamics are critically

assessed. The study concludes that the legacy of Cabral remains profoundly relevant: cultural

sovereignty is inseparable from economic sovereignty. When framed as part of an unfinished

liberation project rather than merely an industrial sector, CCI can support long-term

autonomy and nation-building in Lusophone Africa. Yet their emancipatory capacity depends

on governance choices, equitable infrastructure, and policy frameworks grounded in cultural

rights, social justice, and developmental sovereignty.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

131

Keywords

Amílcar Cabral; Cultural Liberation; Creative and Cultural Industries; Lusophone Africa;

Cultural Sovereignty.

Resumo

Este estudo reconceptualiza a teoria da “libertação cultural” de Amílcar Cabral, situando-a no

contexto da emergência contemporânea das Indústrias Culturais e Criativas (ICC) na África

Lusófona. Cabral defendeu que a cultura constitui não apenas a base da identidade coletiva,

mas também uma força motriz da libertação política. Esta perspetiva oferece um ponto de

partida teórico fundamental para compreender como a cultura pode ser transformada de um

recurso de resistência num pilar estratégico da construção do Estado pós-colonial. Recorrendo

à teoria decolonial de Frantz Fanon, ao quadro conceptual da instrumentalização da cultura

desenvolvido por George Yúdice, e às reflexões de Carlos Lopes sobre a economia criativa

africana, este artigo conceptualiza a cultura como um espaço onde se cruzam legitimidade,

autonomia e desenvolvimento. Com base nesta perspetiva, o artigo propõe um quadro

analítico que estabelece uma ligação entre identidade cultural, Indústrias Culturais e Criativas

e autonomia económica, prolongando o conceito de libertação cultural de Cabral para as

práticas contemporâneas de desenvolvimento pós-colonial.Com base em dados da UNESCO,

UNCTAD, OIT, Brookings e em evidências a nível nacional, este estudo analisa a Guiné-Bissau,

Cabo Verde, São Tomé e Príncipe, Moçambique e Angola, procurando compreender como as

Indústrias Culturais e Criativas funcionam simultaneamente como instrumentos de

diversificação económica, plataformas de consolidação identitária e espaços de

posicionamento geopolítico através da língua, dos media, da música e da criatividade digital.

O artigo argumenta que as ICC possuem potencial para contribuir para a autonomia

económica através da criação de emprego, do reforço das cadeias de valor internas, da

expansão do capital simbólico exportável e da redução da dependência estrutural da ajuda

externa. Contudo, adotando uma perspetiva crítica inspirada em Cabral, o artigo questiona

igualmente se as ICC promovem efetivamente uma transformação decolonial ou se correm o

risco de integrar a produção cultural africana em novas hierarquias do capitalismo cultural

global. Questões como a mercantilização da cultura, a dependência dos mercados externos,

a homogeneização cultural e as dinâmicas desiguais de poder são analisadas criticamente. O

estudo conclui que o legado de Cabral permanece profundamente atual: a soberania cultural

é inseparável da soberania económica. Quando enquadradas como parte de um projeto de

libertação ainda inacabado, e não apenas como um setor industrial, as ICC podem contribuir

para a autonomia de longo prazo e para a construção nacional na África Lusófona. Contudo,

o seu potencial emancipatório depende das escolhas de governação, da construção de

infraestruturas equitativas e de quadros políticos fundamentados nos direitos culturais, na

justiça social e na soberania do desenvolvimento.

Palavras-chave

Amílcar Cabral; Libertação Cultural; Indústrias Criativas e Culturais; África Lusófona;

Soberania Cultural.

How to cite this article

Yuqing, Amelie Lu (2026). From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s

Legacy and Economic Autonomy in Lusophone Africa. Janus.net, e-journal of international relations.

Thematic Dossier – Geopolitics of Anxiety: Ideology, Identity, and (Un)Bordering in Contemporary

Europe and Asia, VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD4, October 2026, pp. 130-157. DOI

https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.DT0726.6

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

132

Article submitted on 7 July 2026 and accepted on 20 August 2026.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

133

FROM CULTURAL LIBERATION TO CREATIVE AND CULTURAL

INDUSTRIES: CABRAL’S LEGACY AND ECONOMIC AUTONOMY IN

LUSOPHONE AFRICA

AMÉLIE LU YUQING

Introduction: Cultural Liberation, Creative and Cultural Industries, and

Economic Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

The year 2025 marks fifty years since the formal independence of the Lusophone African

states, providing a historical vantage point from which to reassess the intellectual,

political, and cultural foundations of their liberation struggles and post-independence

trajectories. Among the leading figures of these processes, Amílcar Cabral remains one

of the most profound thinkers of anti-colonial liberation and nation-building in Africa.

More than a military strategist, Cabral was a theorist of decolonization who framed

liberation not simply as the departure of colonial rulers, but as the restoration of cultural

subjectivity, dignity, and agency (Cabral, 1970/1979; Chabal et al., 2002). His writings

consistently argued that culture represented both the evidence of a people’s existence

and the essential resource enabling collective resistance. For Cabral, colonial domination

functioned not only through administrative control or economic exploitation, but

fundamentally through the attempted destruction, distortion, or subordination of

indigenous cultural systems. It is in this sense that he famously linked “cultural

resistance” to “political resistance,” establishing a conceptual bridge between cultural

vitality and political emancipation.

This insight places Cabral firmly within broader currents of decolonial thought. Frantz

Fanon similarly emphasized colonialism as a system that produces alienation, self-denial,

and dependency, thus requiring a profound cultural and psychological reconstitution as

part of the liberation process (Fanon, 1963). More contemporarily, Yúdice (2003)

conceptualizes culture as a strategic resource in governance, development, and

international relations, rather than a merely symbolic or aesthetic sphere. The

Declaration of Interest - The author declares that there are no known financial, professional, or personal

conflicts of interest that could have appeared to influence this research. The author has no competing interests

to declare.

Acknowledgment - The author acknowledges the use of Microsoft Copilot in assisting with the improvement

of English grammar, the formatting of references, and the standardization of citations in this work. All

intellectual content, arguments, analysis, interpretations, and conclusions remain the sole responsibility of the

author.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

134

convergence between these perspectives situates culture not as a marginal domain, but

as a central terrain on which power, sovereignty, and autonomy are negotiated.

In the Lusophone African world, where language, identity, and political struggle have

long been deeply intertwined, Cabral’s vision has left a lasting influence on debates

concerning postcolonial nation-building, legitimacy, and development trajectories. As

Fernando Arenas (2011) argues, Lusophone Africa is not merely a geographic region

connected by a shared colonial history, but a transnational cultural space continuously

reconfigured through language, media, music, diaspora networks, and cultural flows.

At the same time, the twenty-first century has witnessed a growing international

recognition of the economic, social, and geopolitical significance of Creative and Cultural

Industries (CCI). International institutions such as UNESCO and UNCTAD have played a

central role in articulating culture as both a human right and a strategic pillar of

sustainable development. UNESCO’s policy frameworks emphasize that creativity is

fundamental not only for identity and social cohesion, but also for inclusive growth,

innovation, and democratic participation (UNESCO, 2019/2022). UNCTAD’s Creative

Economy Reports similarly demonstrate that creative industries constitute one of the

most dynamic sectors of global trade, contributing to employment, export expansion,

and technological capacities, with increasing participation from Global South economies

(UNCTAD, 2018/2024). Complementing these perspectives, reports by the International

Labour Organization (ILO) increasingly emphasize both the employment-generating

potential of the creative economy and the precarious conditions faced by cultural

workers, particularly within informal and platform-based sectors (Joffe & Wangusa,

2022). At the same time, Brookings research underscores the strategic implications of

cultural production for development planning, soft power, and global influence (Signé,

2025).

Within African scholarship and policy thinking, Carlos Lopes has emerged as one of the

most influential voices advocating for the creative economy as a pathway toward

structural transformation and economic autonomy. Lopes argues that the creative sector

is not a peripheral luxury but a core development asset capable of driving diversification,

technological innovation, regional integration, and reduced aid dependency (Lopes,

2014/2015/2024). He highlights the success of sectors such as Nollywood, Afrobeat,

digital media, and visual arts as evidence that African creativity is already shaping global

cultural flows, while still remaining constrained by weak infrastructure, uneven

regulation, and external market asymmetries. In his work, Lopes explicitly links creative

capacity to sovereignty, suggesting that economic independence requires control not only

over material resources but also over symbolic production, narratives, and imaginaries.

This study situates Lusophone Africa within this nexus between Cabral’s intellectual

legacy and contemporary debates on culture, economy, and development. It asks how

Cabral’s theory of cultural liberation may be reinterpreted in light of the current rise of

CCI in countries such as Guinea-Bissau, Cabo Verde, São Tomé and Príncipe, Mozambique

and Angola. Rather than treating CCI merely as economic sectors, the paper approaches

them as spaces in which cultural subjectivity, political autonomy, and economic strategy

intersect. The central argument is that Cabral’s insistence on culture as the foundation

of liberation provides a powerful analytical lens for understanding how CCI can contribute

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

135

not only to growth, but to broader agendas of sovereignty, identity consolidation, and

postcolonial emancipation.

However, following Cabral’s critical spirit, the paper also maintains a cautious and

interrogative stance. While CCI hold the potential to generate employment, strengthen

domestic value chains, expand exportable symbolic capital, and enhance soft power, they

also risk being absorbed into global hierarchies of cultural capitalism. Issues such as

unequal market access, dependency on foreign platforms, commodification of identity,

and the dominance of external gatekeepers raise important questions regarding whether

CCI truly advance decolonial transformation or reproduce new forms of dependency.

These tensions echo Cabral’s warning that independence without structural

transformation risks reproducing colonial logic under new forms.

Framed within the context of the fiftieth anniversary of Lusophone African independence,

this paper therefore seeks to contribute to the ongoing reassessment of liberation

legacies and development futures. By bringing Cabral into conversation with UNESCO

and UNCTAD frameworks, contemporary African policy debates, and empirical

developments within Lusophone African creative sectors, it proposes that culture remains

not only a memory of struggle, but a decisive arena for twenty-first century sovereignty.

In this sense, CCI are approached as potential instruments of what Cabral might have

considered the “unfinished project” of liberation: the pursuit of cultural dignity, economic

autonomy, and a more equitable position within the global order.

Research Design and Methodology

This article adopts a qualitative comparative research design to examine how Amílcar

Cabral’s concept of cultural liberation can be reinterpreted in relation to the contemporary

development of CCI in Lusophone Africa. Rather than measuring the economic

performance of the cultural sector through quantitative indicators, the study seeks to

understand how culture functions simultaneously as a source of political legitimacy,

economic strategy and postcolonial state-building. The research therefore combines

conceptual analysis with comparative case studies in order to explore the relationship

between cultural sovereignty, creative industries and economic autonomy across

different national contexts.

The study employs a comparative case study approach because the five Portuguese-

speaking African countries - share a common historical experience of Portuguese

colonialism and anti-colonial struggles, while displaying significantly different political,

economic and institutional trajectories after independence. This combination of historical

similarity and developmental diversity provides an appropriate basis for comparative

analysis. Instead of treating these countries as isolated cases, the article considers them

as members of a common Lusophone postcolonial space whose contemporary

development reflects both shared historical legacies and divergent national strategies.

The selection of these five countries is guided by three criteria. First, all belong to the

group commonly referred to as the Portuguese-speaking African Countries (PALOP),

whose political and cultural identities were profoundly shaped by Portuguese colonial rule

and subsequent independence movements. Second, Amílcar Cabral's political thought

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

136

has exercised varying degrees of influence across these countries, making them

particularly suitable for examining the continuing relevance of his theory of cultural

liberation. Third, the five countries represent different models of cultural and creative

development. Cabo Verde has achieved relatively high international visibility through

music and cultural diplomacy; Angola has developed a more capital-intensive creative

economy supported by state investment and media industries; Mozambique illustrates

the importance of language politics and literary production; Guinea-Bissau highlights the

persistence of community-based cultural practices despite institutional fragility; and São

Tomé and Príncipe represents the structural constraints commonly experienced by small

island developing states. These differences make it possible to identify broader patterns

as well as contrasting pathways of cultural development.

The empirical evidence is derived primarily from documentary analysis and secondary

sources. The study draws upon policy reports, international institutional publications,

academic literature, and publicly available statistical information. Major sources include

UNESCO reports on culture and sustainable development, UNCTAD Creative Economy

Reports, publications of the International Labour Organization (ILO), Brookings

Institution policy papers, as well as national cultural policy documents and official

government publications where available. These materials are complemented by

scholarly studies on Lusophone Africa, postcolonial theory, creative economy, and

cultural policy. Rather than treating institutional reports as objective representations of

reality, the article interprets them critically alongside academic debates concerning

cultural sovereignty, postcolonial development, and the political economy of creative

industries.

The comparative analysis is organised around several analytical dimensions that emerge

from both Cabral's theoretical framework and contemporary discussions of creative

economy. These dimensions include: (1) the relationship between cultural identity and

nation-building; (2) the institutional development of cultural and creative industries; (3)

the contribution of CCIs to economic diversification and employment; (4) the role of

language, media and cultural diplomacy in international positioning; and (5) the

structural limitations affecting cultural autonomy, including market dependence, unequal

global cultural circulation and institutional capacity. Examining each country through

these common dimensions allows the article to move beyond descriptive national

narratives and develop a systematic comparison of different trajectories of postcolonial

cultural development.

Finally, this study does not seek to establish causal relationships in a positivist sense.

Instead, it adopts an interpretive comparative perspective that aims to explain how

Cabral's concept of cultural liberation can illuminate contemporary debates on CCI in

Lusophone Africa. By integrating political thought, cultural policy and comparative

analysis, the article proposes a conceptual framework for understanding CCIs not merely

as economic sectors but as contested arenas in which questions of cultural sovereignty,

development and postcolonial autonomy continue to be negotiated.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

137

Three major contributions to the existing literature

First, it contributes to a renewed interpretation of Amílcar Cabral’s intellectual legacy by

extending his concept of cultural liberation beyond the traditional domains of anti-colonial

struggle and political identity. While Cabral’s emphasis on culture as a foundation of

national consciousness and liberation has been widely recognized, its implications for

contemporary cultural production and economic development remain underexplored. This

article argues that cultural liberation should not be understood only as a symbolic process

of recovering identity, but also as a productive capacity that enables societies to generate

knowledge, creativity, and cultural value.

Second, this article develops a conceptual framework linking Cultural Liberation, Cultural

and Creative Industries, and Economic Autonomy. It proposes that cultural production

can function as a bridge between historical identity formation and contemporary

economic strategies. Through this perspective, CCI are not merely market-oriented

sectors or instruments of cultural diplomacy; they represent institutional spaces where

cultural knowledge, creative labour, and economic opportunities intersect. This

framework provides a new analytical pathway for understanding how post-colonial

societies can transform cultural resources into forms of sustainable autonomy.

Third, this article contributes to comparative research on Portuguese-speaking African

countries by establishing a cross-national analytical framework for examining the

relationship between cultural policies, creative industries, and development trajectories.

Rather than treating Lusophone Africa as a homogeneous cultural space, the article

highlights the diversity of institutional arrangements, historical experiences, and policy

approaches shaping CCI development across different national contexts. By bringing

together Cabralian thought, cultural policy studies, and creative economy research, this

article offers a theoretical framework that connects historical liberation projects with

contemporary debates on cultural sustainability and economic sovereignty.

Part I. Theoretical Foundations: From Cultural Liberation to Cultural

Development

Amílcar Cabral’s conceptualization of liberation as fundamentally rooted in culture

constitutes one of the most original and influential intellectual contributions to African

decolonization thought. Unlike approaches that framed national liberation primarily

through military struggle or political sovereignty, Cabral articulated a deeper ontological

argument: a nation exists first and foremost through culture, and therefore any struggle

for independence must begin with the restoration of cultural agency and dignity. As he

famously noted, “national liberation is necessarily an act of culture” (Cabral, 1970/1979).

For Cabral, culture is not an accessory to politics; it is the foundation upon which political

consciousness, collective mobilization, and national legitimacy are constructed. This

perspective positioned culture as both epistemological grounding and strategic resource

for liberation.

Cabral’s analysis of colonialism was thus not limited to economic exploitation or

administrative domination. He argued that colonial rule sought to “negate the historical

personality of the dominated people,” undermining their self-worth, fragmenting their

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

138

identities, and eroding the symbolic systems through which communities generate

meaning and cohesion (Cabral, 1970/1979; Chabal et al., 2002). Colonial power

functioned through an attempt to render colonized societies culturally dependent,

psychologically subordinate, and epistemologically disoriented. It is precisely against this

process that Cabral placed culture as resistance: the continued production, preservation,

and reinvention of indigenous cultural forms constituted a vital terrain of struggle,

enabling societies to withstand domination and imagine political alternatives.

In this sense, Cabral’s thinking resonates strongly with Frantz Fanon’s theorization of

colonialism as a system that penetrates the psyche, reshaping subjectivity and

internalizing hierarchies of inferiority (Fanon, 1963). For both thinkers, political liberation

is inseparable from cultural and psychological transformation. Where Fanon emphasized

the violence of colonial dehumanization and the necessity of reclaiming selfhood, Cabral

systematized this into a political strategy, making culture not only a site of identity

recovery but a foundation for organized collective action. Their shared insight is clear:

without cultural reconstitution, formal sovereignty risks remaining hollow, vulnerable to

dependency and internal fragmentation.

More contemporary scholarship has further developed this intellectual lineage by

demonstrating that culture is not merely symbolic but strategic. Yúdice (2003), for

instance, advances the notion of culture as a “resource,” integral to governance,

development policy, and global diplomacy. Culture, in his framework, becomes

instrumental in shaping participation, legitimizing state power, enabling economic

innovation, and projecting international presence. This view challenges any dichotomy

between the “cultural” and the “economic,” emphasizing their mutual embeddedness. It

also complements Cabral’s position by providing an analytical vocabulary to understand

how culture operates institutionally and economically in modern governance systems.

This conceptual trajectory also intersects powerfully with contemporary policy discourse

on CCI. International frameworks developed by UNESCO and UNCTAD echo, albeit in

technocratic form, many of Cabral’s insights about culture’s centrality. UNESCO explicitly

frames culture as a pillar of sustainable development, human rights, social cohesion, and

democratic participation, highlighting its transformative potential in both symbolic and

material dimensions (UNESCO, 2019/2022). UNCTAD’s Creative Economy Reports

similarly demonstrate that creativity has become a key domain of global trade dynamics,

generating employment, economic diversification, innovation capabilities, and export

advantages, particularly within Global South contexts (UNCTAD, 2018/2024). Together,

these frameworks institutionalize the argument that culture is not marginal but structural

within development paradigms.

Within African intellectual and policy debates, Carlos Lopes provides an essential bridge

between Cabral’s decolonial cultural theory and contemporary economic strategy. Lopes

(2014, 2015, 2024) insists that African economic transformation requires moving beyond

extractive models and aid dependency toward endogenous capacity-building grounded in

African knowledge, creativity, and innovation. For Lopes, creative and cultural sectors

represent not “luxury industries” but fundamental developmental assets. They foster

technological adaptation, stimulate urban economies, enable youth employment,

promote regional integration, and reposition African societies within global symbolic

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

139

hierarchies. Crucially, Lopes echoes Cabral in linking culture to sovereignty: to control

one’s future requires controlling not only material resources but also meaning,

representation, and narrative.

Bringing these strands together allows for the development of a coherent theoretical

framework for this study. Cabral offers the normative and political foundation: culture as

the core of liberation, subjectivity, and legitimacy. Fanon and subsequent decolonial

thinkers deepen the understanding of cultural emancipation as psychological and

epistemological reconstruction. Yúdice provides the conceptual apparatus to understand

culture’s operational role in governance and development. UNESCO and UNCTAD

institutionalize culture within contemporary global development paradigms. Lopes

situates these debates within African political economy, transforming culture from

symbolic resistance into an economic strategy for autonomy.

This layered framework permits a crucial analytical shift: from understanding culture

primarily as resistance to understanding it as development. For Cabral, culture was what

allowed societies to resist domination and imagine independence. Today, within

Lusophone Africa, culture also becomes what allows societies to consolidate identity,

legitimize the state, generate employment, diversify economies, and negotiate their

position within the international order. In other words, the trajectory moves from cultural

resistance to cultural sovereignty and to cultural development.

Yet, this framework also invites critical reflection. Cabral warned explicitly that political

independence without structural transformation risks reproducing colonial hierarchies

under new forms (Cabral, 1970/1979). This warning remains pertinent in discussions of

the creative economy. While CCI may provide opportunities for autonomy, they may

equally be integrated into global market hierarchies characterized by unequal power,

external dependency, and commodified identity. Thus, any engagement with CCI through

Cabral’s legacy must remain attentive to these tensions: whether creative industries

advance decolonial empowerment or whether they risk becoming merely another

insertion into global capitalist structures. This tension will shape the analytical approach

of the subsequent sections.

Part II. Translating Theory into Policy

Building on Amílcar Cabral’s foundational insight that “national liberation is necessarily

an act of culture” (Cabral, 1970/1979), this section examines how cultural resistance and

the assertion of cultural subjectivity have been institutionalized and operationalized in

post-independence Lusophone Africa. The transition from cultural liberation to structured

cultural development represents a crucial axis along which the ambitions of political

sovereignty intersect with economic strategy, social cohesion, and international

engagement.

Building upon the theoretical discussion presented in the previous section, this part

examines how Cabral’s vision of cultural liberation was translated into post-independence

policy agendas. As Fernandes (2023) argues, the construction of postcolonial states in

Lusophone Africa required mechanisms capable of restoring cultural agency and fostering

collective participation in political and economic life. Rather than revisiting Cabral’s

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

140

theory, the discussion focuses on how cultural sovereignty became institutionalised

through education, language planning, cultural governance and, more recently, CCI.

International policy frameworks developed by UNESCO and UNCTAD have provided

important reference points for this transition, recognising culture not only as heritage but

also as a driver of innovation, employment and sustainable development. Although

developed within a different historical context, these frameworks resonate with Cabral's

broader emphasis on cultural sovereignty and endogenous development. Carlos Lopes

further extends this perspective by arguing that investment in Africa's creative industries

can contribute to economic diversification, youth employment and technological

innovation, thereby linking cultural production directly to broader development strategies

(Lopes, 2014, 2015, 2024).

Davis, Straubhaar, and Ferin Cunha (2016) further argue that a transnational Lusophone

media space has gradually emerged among Portuguese-speaking countries. The

circulation of television, radio, and digital media has strengthened postcolonial cultural

ties while also reshaping the position of Lusophone African countries within global cultural

flows. The translation from cultural liberation to cultural development can be understood

through several policy dimensions:

1. Institutionalization of Culture: Post-independence Lusophone states established

ministries or departments of culture tasked with overseeing artistic production,

heritage conservation, and public education. These institutions operationalize Cabral’s

notion of culture as foundational to national consciousness, enabling states to craft

narratives of sovereignty and nationhood (Fernandes, 2023; Mazrui, 1990).

2. Education and Language Policy: Language planning, literacy campaigns, and bilingual

education initiatives in countries like Guinea-Bissau, CaboVerde, and Mozambique

illustrate the integration of cultural policy into broader social development. By

valorising indigenous languages alongside Portuguese, states attempt to restore

cultural dignity while facilitating socio-economic participation (Senghor, 1964; Cabral,

1970).

3. Cultural Industries as Economic Strategy: The development of formal creative sectors

represents the economic operationalization of cultural liberation. By recognizing

culture as an economic asset, Lusophone African states align with UNESCO and

UNCTAD’s prescriptions, creating spaces for entrepreneurial activity, innovation, and

global market participation (UNESCO, 2019; UNCTAD, 2018). The emphasis on local

content production and exportable creative goods ensures that culture is not merely

symbolic but also materialized as income, employment, and trade opportunities.

4. Cultural Diplomacy and Regional Integration: Engagement in cultural diplomacy—

through festivals, exhibitions, and transnational partnerships—allows Lusophone

African countries to project soft power, strengthen regional networks, and negotiate

a presence in global knowledge economies. These efforts reflect Cabral’s enduring

emphasis on culture as both a domestic anchor and an international lever (Cabral,

1979; Lopes, 2015).

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

141

Despite these policy advances, the institutionalisation of CCI also introduces new tensions

concerning market dependence, cultural commodification and unequal participation in

global creative industries. These issues are examined in greater detail in Part Four.

Overall, this section has shown how Cabral's philosophy of cultural liberation gradually

evolved into concrete policy instruments across education, language planning, cultural

governance and creative industries. The following section examines how these policy

orientations have been implemented in five Lusophone African countries, revealing both

shared trajectories and significant national differences.

Part III. Lusophone Africa Case Studies: Cultural Liberation and Creative

& Cultural Industries

In the postcolonial development of Lusophone Africa, cultural expression is no longer

confined to processes of national identity formation within individual states, but is

increasingly embedded in transnational networks of circulation. Beyond music,

broadcasting, and digital media, literature also constitutes a key dimension of cultural

connectivity across the Lusophone world. As Helgesson and Stella (2023) argue,

Lusophone African literature forms a dynamic postcolonial literary field shaped by

circulation, translation, and symbolic recognition across Africa, Portugal, Brazil, and

global publishing markets. This transnational cultural space demonstrates that the CCI

in Lusophone Africa are not merely products of domestic cultural policy, but are also

shaped by the interaction of global cultural capital, linguistic systems, and postcolonial

regimes of circulation.

Guinea-Bissau

To understand how Cabral’s conception of culture as a form of political resistance evolved

within the postcolonial trajectories of Lusophone Africa, it is necessary to begin with

Guinea-Bissau, where his anti-colonial thought emerged most directly through the

liberation struggle led by the PAIGC (African Party for the Independence of Guinea and

Cabo Verde). The case of Guinea-Bissau represents not only the revolutionary origins of

cultural liberation, but also reveals the enduring tensions between postcolonial

sovereignty, fragile state structures, and the uneven institutional development of CCI.

The fragility of the post-independence state has profoundly shaped the trajectory of

cultural development in Guinea-Bissau. The liberation struggle was not only a military

confrontation, but also a deeply cultural project, relying on oral traditions, poetry, and

songs of resistance to construct political consciousness and collective identity (Chabal et

al., 2002). In the immediate post-independence period, culture was envisioned as a

unifying force and a foundational pillar of national belonging, closely aligned with Cabral’s

argument that liberation struggles are, at their core, cultural struggles.

However, Guinea-Bissau has long been characterized by political instability and weak

institutional capacity, which have significantly constrained the development of formal

cultural infrastructure (Chabal & Daloz, 1999; World Bank, 2024). In the context of

limited state provision, economic and cultural life is widely embedded in informal systems

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

142

of exchange and social networks, which in many instances function as forms of substitute

governance (Lourenço-Lindell, 2002; Lundy, 2015).

Within this structural condition, cultural practices such as gumbe music and ritual

performance are sustained primarily through community relations and localized

practices. Their significance lies not only in aesthetic or artistic expression, but also in

their role as embedded mechanisms of collective communication and social reproduction,

rather than as components of a formalized or industrialized cultural production system.

In this sense, Guinea-Bissau demonstrates a form of cultural agency that remains deeply

embedded in everyday social life: even under structural constraints, cultural vitality

continues to be remarkably resilient. However, such cultural agency does not

automatically translate into economic autonomy. Due to the lack of sustained investment,

coherent cultural policies, and institutional support, these cultural practices have

struggled to develop into structured CCI capable of generating large-scale employment,

promoting economic diversification, or supporting cultural diplomacy. Therefore, the case

of Guinea-Bissau reveals an important distinction between cultural resources and creative

industry capacity: rich cultural heritage alone is insufficient to generate economic value;

its transformation depends on institutional capacity, infrastructure development, and

mechanisms that enable local creators to retain and capture value from cultural

production.

This creates a structural paradox: a society with rich and resilient cultural forms lacks

the capacity to transform these cultural assets into an institutionalized creative economy

and therefore faces difficulties in achieving broader economic autonomy through cultural

production in the sense envisioned by Cabral.

Cabo Verde

While Guinea-Bissau reflects the revolutionary foundations of Cabral’s cultural liberation

project, Cabo Verde demonstrates how postcolonial cultural identity can be transformed

into a globally recognized model of cultural export and creative economy development.

The international success of Cesária Évora and the globalization of Cabo Verdean music

illustrate how cultural expression rooted in creole identity, memory, and saudade entered

transnational circuits of cultural consumption, symbolic recognition, and market

circulation.

Within the Lusophone African context, Cabo Verde represents one of the clearest cases

in which the legacy of cultural liberation has been translated into a structured creative

economy. Unlike many resource-rich African states, Cabo Verde’s geopolitical condition

and limited natural endowments have made culture itself a strategic development

resource. In the post-independence nation-building process, national identity was

articulated through a fusion of creole consciousness, the affective memory of saudade,

and musical expression as a marker of autonomy. From the 1990s onward, Cesária Évora

became the symbolic figure of this transformation, as her global recognition elevated

morna and coladeira from local expressive forms into internationally recognized cultural

exports endowed with both symbolic legitimacy and economic value (Baker, 2024;

Curington, 2017; dos Santos, 2023). From a Cabralian perspective, this musical

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

143

production can be read as a continuation of cultural resistance in the post-independence

era, asserting Cabo Verdean subjectivity within global cultural circulation and challenging

epistemic marginalization rooted in colonial histories.

Building on this cultural foundation, the Cabo Verdean state has progressively integrated

cultural capacity into formal development policy. Music festivals, diaspora-oriented

strategies, and cultural diplomacy have become simultaneously instruments of soft power

and economic development. Events such as Baía das Gatas and the Atlantic Music Expo

demonstrate how cultural production has been linked to tourism, service-sector

employment, and foreign cultural investment. Empirical studies indicate that music

tourism contributes measurably to GDP while also supporting employment in hospitality

and creative sectors.

At the same time, diplomatic initiatives have mobilized culture to strengthen diaspora

ties, attract remittances, and encourage cultural investment. From the perspective of

Cabral’s intellectual legacy, this incorporation of culture into development strategy can

be interpreted as an attempt to reclaim cultural production from purely neo-colonial

market logic and to re-anchor it within projects of national autonomy.

However, this cultural development model also generates new forms of structural

dependency. Although Cabo Verde is often presented as a successful cultural economy

case, its reliance on tourism and international cultural markets creates significant

vulnerability to external demand, global consumption patterns, and fluctuations in

transnational cultural flows.

Despite its small territorial scale, Cabo Verde has developed a disproportionate cultural

presence within the Lusophone world through music and other creative industries. Its

youth-oriented creative economy—where approximately 60% of practitioners are under

the age of 25—spans music, fashion, design, and crafts, with influence extending into

diasporic communities. The Ministry of Culture and Creative Industries has implemented

the National and International Policy for Circulation and Export of Cabo Verdean Creative

Industries, strategically promoting branding initiatives in crafts, fashion, and design to

strengthen both domestic and international market visibility (Franco & Njogu, 2020;

UNCTAD, 2018).

However, this model remains deeply ambivalent. As critics have noted, the

commodification of culture can reshape artistic production in accordance with global

market preferences, privileging exportable forms while marginalizing locally embedded

practices. Cultural elites and institutional curators also gain disproportionate power in

determining which cultural expressions are recognized as nationally representative in

international arenas. This tension echoes Yúdice’s warning that when culture becomes

development infrastructure, it risks being absorbed into capitalist branding regimes and

detached from its social and historical foundations (Yúdice, 2003). Consequently, the

Cabo Verdean case illustrates both the emancipatory potential and the structural fragility

of CCI as a postcolonial development strategy.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

144

São Tomé and Príncipe

In contrast to Cabo Verde’s global cultural export model, São Tomé and Príncipe

represents a micro-scale cultural economy characterized by small-island dependency,

fragile infrastructure, and sustained reliance on transnational cooperation networks.

Within the broader Lusophone African context, São Tomé and Príncipe shares similarities

with Cabo Verde in terms of its small territorial scale and limited resource base. However,

unlike Cabo Verde’s early consolidation of an internationally visible cultural brand, São

Tomé and Príncipe’s CCI remain at a more fragile stage of development, where cultural

production is continuously negotiated between local identity formation and transnational

Lusophone connectivity. As Arenas (2011) argues, Lusophone African cultural space

should not be understood as a closed national system, but rather as a transnational

network continuously reconfigured through colonial history, diasporic circulation, media

flows, and Atlantic cultural linkages. In São Tomé and Príncipe, this transnational

condition is particularly pronounced: music, oral traditions, festivals, and Creole cultural

expressions constitute key components of national identity, while increasingly relying on

Lusophone cultural circulation channels, multilateral platforms, and international

cooperation frameworks to achieve external visibility.

Building on this dynamic, Leandro, Beja, and Lu (2022) highlight that São Tomé and

Príncipe has, in the postcolonial period, increasingly shifted from fragmented bilateral

cultural exchanges toward more institutionalized forms of multilateral cooperation,

particularly through the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP) and

partnerships with external actors such as China. In this sense, culture functions not only

as a marker of national identity, but also as a strategic medium through which small

island states connect to global networks, access development resources, and enhance

international presence.

At the same time, São Tomé and Príncipe also exemplifies the structural vulnerabilities

of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in the field of CCI. Limited domestic markets,

weak cultural infrastructure, talent outmigration, and dependence on external funding

mechanisms significantly constrain the formation of a sustainable cultural economy.

However, cultural recognition alone has not been sufficient to generate sustainable

economic opportunities, as the country’s small scale and limited institutional capacity

continue to constrain the institutionalization of creative industries. As Leandro, Martínez-

Galán, and Gonçalves (2019) note that Portuguese-speaking SIDS, including Cabo Verde,

São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste, commonly face structural dependence on

international cooperation frameworks and tourism-driven economic models.

Furthermore, Davis, Straubhaar, and Ferin Cunha (2016) show that the emergence of a

transnational Lusophone media space, while strengthening cultural connectivity across

Portuguese-speaking countries, also risks reinforcing center–periphery hierarchies,

whereby smaller African Lusophone states become increasingly dependent on external

media platforms and institutional infrastructures. As Moyo (2024) further argues, when

cultural policy is progressively embedded within market-oriented development

paradigms, creative industries may generate visibility, symbolic capital, and economic

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

145

opportunities, yet they simultaneously risk becoming constrained by external funding

regimes, global tourism markets, and transnational cultural consumption structures.

From this perspective, São Tomé and Príncipe reveals a fundamental tension at the heart

of postcolonial cultural development in Lusophone Africa: while CCI offer pathways for

economic diversification and international recognition, they also reproduce structural

dependencies that limit cultural sovereignty. In Cabral’s theoretical framework, this

condition reflects both the ongoing pursuit of post-independence cultural autonomy and

the persistent inequalities embedded within the global cultural economy.

Mozambique

In contrast to the small-scale and dependency-oriented cultural economy of São Tomé

and Príncipe, the case of Mozambique foregrounds the central role of language politics in

shaping literary circulation, where Portuguese operates simultaneously as a postcolonial

medium of communication and a gatekeeping structure for cultural visibility, as

exemplified in the work of Mia Couto (Bucaioni, 2023).

Mozambique offers a salient example of how language politics is deeply entangled with

the development of postcolonial CCI. Although the country is characterized by significant

linguistic diversity, including Makhuwa, Tsonga, and Sena, Portuguese remains the

official language and continues to function as the dominant medium in education, media,

and cultural institutions (Benson, 2000). Post-independence language policies have

sought to elevate indigenous languages and cultural traditions as part of broader anti-

colonial nation-building efforts. However, as Cabral cautioned, when the colonial

language persists as the primary vehicle of knowledge production and public culture,

epistemic hierarchies remain intact even after formal political liberation.

Within this context, cultural producers in Mozambique operate within a complex linguistic

field. Film, music, and theatre productions frequently rely on Portuguese in order to

access regional and Lusophone markets (Davis, Straubhaar, & Ferin Cunha, 2016), while

artistic expressions rooted in local languages often gain strong domestic legitimacy but

encounter significant barriers in transnational circulation, where Portuguese and other

global languages continue to dominate. This tension reflects a broader structural dilemma

facing creative industries in postcolonial contexts: whether to prioritize cultural

authenticity grounded in linguistic plurality or to pursue market visibility shaped by

inherited colonial language economies.

This linguistic configuration not only structures cultural production internally but also

determines the visibility and translatability of cultural outputs within transnational

circulation systems. In this sense, language functions as a form of “entry structure,”

shaping which narratives are translated, circulated, and ultimately converted into

international cultural capital. Accordingly, language politics extends beyond

communication into the broader distribution of symbolic capital and the production of

cultural value.

This logic of linguistic circulation is particularly evident in the international reception of

Lusophone African literature. Writers such as Mia Couto and José Eduardo Agualusa have

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

146

achieved global recognition, with their works translated into multiple languages and

incorporated into world literary circuits. However, as Bucaioni (2023) argues, such

circulation is also shaped by external publishing markets, processes of canon formation,

and transnational gatekeeping structures, raising critical questions about who defines

“representative” African literature in Portuguese.

From this perspective, literature is not an autonomous field outside language politics, but

rather its institutionalized expression within the global cultural system. Linguistic

hierarchies are continuously reproduced and re-encoded through publishing mechanisms,

translation regimes, and processes of literary canonization, thereby shaping which

cultural voices gain international recognition and which remain marginalized.

Mozambique’s efforts to institutionalize cultural production further highlight the

challenges involved in transforming cultural vitality into sustainable economic autonomy.

Although Mozambique possesses significant cultural resources in music, crafts, and

performing arts, this sector remains shaped by international development agendas and

external funding structures, raising important questions about the possibilities for long-

term cultural autonomy. The country has undertaken policy reforms in cultural

governance and intellectual property frameworks to support creators and promote the

formalization of artistic production. However, implementation capacity remains highly

uneven, particularly affecting cultural practitioners operating within the informal

economy, including musicians, artisans, and performers (UNESCO, 2013; Joffe &

Wangusa, 2022).

International organizations, including UNESCO, emphasize that in the absence of robust

legal and institutional frameworks, creative sectors risk reproducing inequality,

disproportionately benefiting established actors with international networks while

marginalizing grassroots producers. Consequently, in Mozambique’s postcolonial cultural

economy, language systems, literary circulation, legal structures, and market dynamics

are not isolated domains but interdependent mechanisms that jointly determine the

possibility of cultural sovereignty.

Ultimately, Mozambique demonstrates how language, law, and economic structures

intersect to shape a fundamental question: whether cultural expression can serve as a

foundation for creative sovereignty, or whether it risks remaining an ambiguous

extension of colonial cultural economies.

Angola

While Mozambique highlights how language politics and literary circulation structure

cultural visibility in Lusophone Africa, the case of Angola shifts the analytical focus toward

a more capital-intensive cultural economy, where media industries, audiovisual

production, and co-production networks are increasingly shaped by oil-based wealth,

state investment, and transnational media circuits. In this context, cultural production

becomes deeply intertwined with economic capital, positioning Angola as a key site for

understanding the dynamics of a fully capitalized model of CCI in the region.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

147

Emerging from a prolonged civil war (1975–2002), Angola’s postwar cultural

reconstruction has involved not only the rebuilding of physical infrastructure but also the

reconstitution of symbolic frameworks of national belonging. Within a state-led cultural

governance system dominated by the MPLA, musical forms such as Semba and Kizomba

have been actively mobilized as national cultural symbols. Disseminated through

powerful state media infrastructures, these genres are embedded within narratives of

unity, resilience, and postwar national rebirth. From a Cabralian perspective, these

culturally grounded forms—originally shaped in contexts of struggle—retain traces of

resistance, while being reconfigured in the post-independence period as instruments for

constructing collective identity and challenging residual colonial hierarchies of cultural

value.

At the same time, Angola’s economic liberalization in the early 2000s facilitated the rapid

expansion of television and creative media industries, opening space for private

broadcasters and new media producers. Locally produced soap operas, entertainment

programming, and music television have generated new forms of cultural capital that are

deeply embedded in market logic. This evolution resonates with Carlos Lopes’s argument

that African creative industries, when supported by adequate training systems,

intellectual property regimes, and distribution infrastructures, can contribute

meaningfully to economic diversification and employment creation (Lopes, 2015).

However, Ferreira (2012) underscores the ambivalent transnationality of post-

independence Luso-African co-productions, which, while enhancing visibility and funding

opportunities, often remain dependent on Portuguese institutional frameworks and

European cultural financing systems.

Nevertheless, Angola’s creative economy remains affected by its continued dependence

on extractive industries and unequal access to cultural infrastructure. The expansion of

cultural markets has not necessarily translated into broader participation or a more

equitable distribution of creative value. Rather, the growth of cultural sectors has often

coexisted with persistent economic concentration and uneven opportunities for cultural

producers.

Angola thus exemplifies a dual dynamic in which cultural policy is simultaneously part of

state-building projects and embedded within capitalist systems that both enable cultural

production and reproduce concentrated economic power.

Despite these structural constraints, Angola has developed one of the most institutionally

structured creative sectors in Lusophone Africa. Music industries built around Kizomba,

Kuduro, and Semba have achieved regional and diasporic influence, particularly in

Europe. Institutions such as the Angola Music Awards have contributed to the

formalization and professionalization of the sector. In 2017, the Ministry of Culture

advanced new strategic objectives aimed at reorganizing the national cultural and

creative industries, while biennial cultural events have promoted a broader pan-African

discourse of “culture of peace.” Angola has also benefited from international capacity-

building initiatives, including the EU–UNCTAD Train for Trade II programme, which

supports training, market access, and institutional development (Franco & Njogu, 2020;

UNCTAD, 2018).

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

148

Recent UN mapping further indicates that Angola’s creative economy spans expanding

sectors such as music, audiovisual production, fashion, and digital entrepreneurship,

although persistent challenges remain in infrastructure, financing, and institutional

coordination (Figueira et al., 2023). Taken together, these dynamics illustrate how

Angola’s cultural economy is simultaneously driven by state power, oil capital, and

transnational media integration, while remaining structurally constrained by uneven

development and dependency relations.

Comparative Discussion

The five case studies demonstrate that the evolution of CCI in Lusophone Africa cannot

be understood simply through individual national experiences. Although each country has

followed a distinct postcolonial trajectory, a cross-case comparison reveals several

common patterns as well as important differences in the ways culture has been mobilised

as a political, economic and developmental resource. Examining these similarities and

divergences makes it possible to move beyond descriptive country narratives and to

identify broader implications for understanding the continuing relevance of Amílcar

Cabral's theory of cultural liberation.

Culture as a Shared Foundation of Nation-building

The first common pattern concerns the central role of culture in postcolonial nation-

building. Across all five countries, cultural policy has extended beyond artistic production

to become an instrument for constructing political legitimacy, reinforcing collective

identity and consolidating national sovereignty. This finding strongly echoes Cabral's

argument that national liberation is fundamentally a cultural act rather than merely the

achievement of political independence (Cabral, 1970/1979).

Despite considerable differences in institutional capacity, each country has attempted to

transform cultural heritage into a source of national cohesion. Guinea-Bissau continues

to preserve the symbolic legacy of the liberation struggle through community-based

cultural practices and collective memory. Cabo Verde has institutionalised Creole identity

through music, cultural diplomacy and diaspora engagement. Mozambique has

emphasised language and literature as mechanisms for negotiating postcolonial identity,

while Angola has employed state-supported media, music and audiovisual industries to

reinforce narratives of national unity after civil war. São Tomé and Príncipe, although

constrained by its small domestic market, has similarly relied on cultural heritage and

Lusophone networks to strengthen its international visibility.

Taken together, these experiences demonstrate that Cabral's concept of cultural

liberation remains highly relevant. Culture continues to function as an essential source

of legitimacy, identity and political cohesion throughout Lusophone Africa, even though

the institutional mechanisms through which these objectives are pursued differ

considerably.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

149

Creative Industries as a Development Strategy

A second common pattern is the increasing institutional recognition of CCI as instruments

of economic development. None of the five countries now approaches culture solely as

symbolic heritage. Instead, all have progressively incorporated creative industries into

broader national development strategies, reflecting the growing influence of UNESCO,

UNCTAD and other international policy frameworks promoting the creative economy.

Nevertheless, the degree of institutionalisation varies substantially. Cabo Verde has

developed perhaps the most coherent strategy by integrating music, tourism, cultural

diplomacy and diaspora networks into a relatively diversified creative economy. Angola

has invested heavily in media industries, audiovisual production and cultural

infrastructure, supported by comparatively stronger state capacity and financial

resources. Mozambique has focused more selectively on literature, language policy and

cultural governance, while São Tomé and Príncipe continues to rely largely on externally

supported cultural initiatives. Guinea-Bissau remains characterised by vibrant cultural

production but comparatively weak institutional structures capable of transforming

cultural activity into a sustainable creative economy.

The comparison therefore suggests that the transition from cultural liberation to cultural

development is not automatic. Rather, successful institutionalisation depends upon

governance capacity, long-term policy commitment, investment in cultural infrastructure

and the ability to integrate cultural production into broader development strategies.

Divergent Models of Creative Economy

Beyond these shared aspirations, the five countries exhibit markedly different models of

creative economy development. Cabo Verde represents an export-oriented model in

which music, festivals and cultural tourism generate international visibility while

simultaneously reinforcing national branding and diaspora connections. Cultural

production has become an internationally recognised economic asset.

Angola illustrates a more state-supported and capital-intensive model. Strong public

investment, expanding audiovisual industries and commercial media have created a

relatively institutionalised cultural sector. However, this model also reflects the broader

political economy of an oil-dependent state, where cultural development remains closely

linked to government priorities and patterns of capital concentration.

Mozambique represents a language-mediated model in which literature, publishing and

linguistic politics occupy a central position. Here, the principal challenge is less the

absence of creativity than the unequal linguistic structures governing access to

international cultural circulation. Portuguese simultaneously facilitates global visibility

while reproducing postcolonial hierarchies that marginalise many local languages.

São Tomé and Príncipe illustrates an aid-dependent small-island model. Cultural

production is shaped by international cooperation, Lusophone cultural networks and

external development programmes. Although these partnerships expand international

visibility, they also expose the country to structural dependence upon foreign funding

and institutional support.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

150

Finally, Guinea-Bissau represents a community-based model in which cultural vitality

survives largely through local traditions, informal social networks and collective memory

rather than through institutionalised creative industries. Cultural resilience remains

remarkably strong, yet the absence of sustained policy support has limited the

emergence of a formal creative economy.

These contrasting trajectories demonstrate that there is no single pathway through which

postcolonial societies transform cultural resources into economic development. Instead,

different historical legacies, governance capacities and institutional arrangements have

generated multiple models of creative economy across Lusophone Africa.

Unequal Integration into Global Cultural Markets

A further dimension of comparison concerns the relationship between national creative

sectors and global cultural circulation. The five countries differ considerably in their

capacity to participate in international markets. Cabo Verde has achieved the highest

degree of cultural export through globally recognised music and diaspora networks.

Angola has expanded its regional influence through commercial media, music industries

and audiovisual production, although much of this expansion remains connected to

domestic political economy and Portuguese-speaking markets.

Mozambique participates internationally primarily through literature and publishing,

where global visibility is strongly mediated by translation, language and external

publishing institutions. São Tomé and Príncipe remains highly dependent upon

international cultural cooperation and development partnerships to access wider

audiences, while Guinea-Bissau has experienced comparatively limited integration into

global creative markets despite the richness of its cultural traditions.

These differences illustrate that participation in the global creative economy is shaped

not only by cultural resources but also by unequal access to finance, distribution systems,

intellectual property regimes, international networks and digital infrastructure.

Consequently, cultural sovereignty continues to operate within asymmetrical global

structures that reproduce significant disparities between countries.

Broader Theoretical Implications

The comparative analysis offers several broader implications for both Cabral studies and

contemporary debates on CCI. First, the findings suggest that Cabral's concept of cultural

liberation should not be interpreted solely as a theory of anti-colonial resistance. Rather,

it provides a valuable framework for understanding how culture continues to shape

economic strategy, institutional development and national sovereignty in the postcolonial

era. The transition from cultural resistance to cultural development represents not a

departure from Cabral's thought but one possible contemporary extension of it.

Second, the comparison demonstrates that CCI cannot be understood simply as engines

of economic growth. Their developmental potential depends upon institutional capacity,

governance quality, cultural policy, legal protection and equitable participation in global

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

151

cultural markets. Countries with stronger institutions have generally been more

successful in transforming cultural assets into sustainable creative industries, whereas

countries with weaker institutional structures continue to face significant barriers despite

rich cultural resources.

Finally, the comparison reinforces the central tension running throughout this article.

Creative industries undoubtedly provide important opportunities for employment,

economic diversification and international visibility. At the same time, they remain

embedded within unequal global systems of cultural production, market exchange and

symbolic recognition. Consequently, the expansion of CCI does not automatically fulfil

Cabral's emancipatory vision. Instead, it raises a continuing question that lies at the heart

of postcolonial development: can culture become a genuine foundation for economic

autonomy and cultural sovereignty, or will it be increasingly incorporated into new forms

of global cultural capitalism?

This unresolved tension links the comparative findings presented in this section to the

broader critical discussion developed in the following part of the article, where the

political and conceptual boundaries of CCI are examined through Cabral's continuing

legacy.

Part IV. Critique and Reflection from a Cabralian Perspective

Can Creative and Cultural Industries Truly Continue the Emancipatory Project

Envisioned by Cabral? Moyo (2024) argues that cultural policy in Africa is increasingly

oscillating between two orientations: treating culture as a commodity and

understanding culture as a form of social praxis. This tension is central to evaluating

whether the creative industries in Lusophone Africa continue Cabral’s emancipatory

vision or are gradually being absorbed into global market rationalities and capitalist

cultural systems.

The significance of this issue lies in the increasingly prominent role that CCI occupy

within contemporary development strategies in Lusophone Africa. Although creative

and cultural industries are increasingly regarded in Lusophone African countries as

potential drivers of economic growth, employment creation, and international cultural

visibility, their expansion does not necessarily imply the realization of the cultural

liberation or economic autonomy emphasized by Cabral. Cabral stressed that culture is

not merely a symbolic instrument of resistance, but also a source of political

subjectivity and a fundamental basis for overcoming colonial domination (Cabral,

1970). However, contemporary creative economy structures often operate within global

capitalist logics and market value systems, and these logics are not always compatible

with projects of decolonization (Yúdice, 2003; Lopes, 2015).

In Lusophone Africa and across the continent more broadly, the rapid conceptual

elevation of CCI within national and international development discourse warrants critical

interrogation. The core promise of cultural and creative industries is that they offer a

pathway to sustainable employment, innovation, and economic diversification while

enhancing cultural identity and global presence (UNCTAD, 2018/2024). Yet, as Carlos

Lopes has argued both in How Can Africa Profit from Its Creative Industries? and in

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

152

Creativity Is the New Money, there exists a risk that these very frameworks may

inadvertently reproduce structural inequalities unless grounded in deliberate policy and

institutional capacity building. In his 2015 piece How Can Africa Profit from Its Creative

Industries? Lopes foregrounds the untapped talent and potential across creative sectors,

urging that Africa must strengthen ecosystems of training, intellectual property

protection, and distribution infrastructure to fully convert creativity into economic value

(Lopes, 2014/2015). This argument aligns with broader UNCTAD analysis that CCI can

contribute to local development pathways but requires strategic policy integration rather

than mere rhetorical celebration (UNCTAD, 2018/2024).

From a Cabralian standpoint, however, the integration of culture into development policy

cannot be assessed solely in terms of economic outputs. Cabral’s framework

conceptualized culture as a foundational force of liberation, a source of collective

subjectivity and political legitimacy that must be nurtured beyond market metrics. This

poses a central question: in the push to operationalize culture as an economic sector,

does the prevailing CCI discourse remain true to the emancipatory potential envisioned

in anti-colonial thought, or does it risk folding culture into global capital markets in ways

that replicate neo-colonial logic?

This concern is underscored in Lopes’ more recent work The Self-Deception Trap, in which

he critiques longstanding development paradigms, including aid dependency and

attendant power asymmetries that undercut African agency and structural

transformation. Lopes argues that entrenched narratives—framed in benevolence and

charity—obscure deeper systemic issues that perpetuate economic dependency while

failing to build endogenous capacity for autonomous development (Lopes, 2024).

Although The Self-Deception Trap focuses on Africa–Europe relations and aid paradigms,

the ethos of this critique extends to the cultural economy: if cultural policies merely

mimic global development prescriptions without aligning with locally grounded goals of

self-determination and structural empowerment, then CCI may inadvertently reinforce

patterns of dependency that Cabral and Fanon contested. Indeed, Fanon’s critique of

cultural colonization warns against the absorption of colonized cultures into the value

systems of a global order that privileges commodification and external validation over

internal coherence and autonomy (Fanon, 1963; Cabral, 1970/1979).

One salient feature of the contemporary CCI policy landscape is its alignment with global

market logics. International organizations and development agencies increasingly

quantify creative industries through contribution to GDP, export revenues, or

employment statistics—measures that reflect global economic priorities more readily

than social justice or historical redress (UNESCO, 2018/2024). Scholars like Throsby and

Cunningham remind us that cultural policy cannot be equated with industrial policy

without careful reflection on value systems, cultural rights, and the risk of cultural

homogenization under market pressures. Without protections for cultural diversity and

equitable access to creative participation, there is potential for CCI growth to concentrate

benefits among already advantaged groups, reproducing inequalities that contradict the

purported ethos of inclusive cultural development.

In Lusophone contexts, this critique is concrete. The cases examined in Part III reveal

varied capacities to harness cultural capital meaningfully. Cabo Verde’s integration of

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

153

creative sectors into tourism and diaspora engagements offers a promising example of

how cultural policy can align with national vision; nevertheless, even here the localization

of industry has not fully insulated creative actors from global market demands that shape

aesthetic and commercial priorities. Angola’s emergent media and entertainment sectors

similarly highlight the tensions between political symbolism and market orientation,

where cultural production can articulate post-conflict identity while still being embedded

within extractive economic structures. Mozambique and Guinea-Bissau underscore the

fragility of institutional ecosystems necessary for creative autonomy, where language

politics, regulatory gaps, and state capacity deeply shape creative trajectories.

This unevenness cautions against universal prescriptions. A Cabralian critique does not

reject the economic utility of CCI; instead, it insists that cultural industries must be

framed within a broader analytical field of decolonial strategy, one that prioritizes

structural transformation over mere integration into global commodity circuits. Culture’s

translation into economic agency cannot be a “market first” endeavour; it must

simultaneously safeguard cultural sovereignty, address historical imbalances, and create

indigenous pathways of innovation that resist extraction and dependency (Lopes,

2014/2015; UNECA, 2018). In this regard, The Self-Deception Trap contributes to the

critique by challenging Africa’s intellectual dependency on external framings and urging

a recalibration of both policy discourse and power relations in development practice

(Lopes, 2024; UNCTAD, 2024).

In sum, Part IV articulates a dual critique: CCI can be a catalyst for economic and cultural

renewal, but without a Cabral-informed critical lens, there is a risk that creative industries

will be subsumed under global market logics that valorise output over agency,

consumption over meaning, and growth over equity. The challenge for policymakers,

scholars, and cultural practitioners in Lusophone Africa is to craft cultural frameworks

that leverage creative potential without replicating structures of commodification and

dependency that Cabral’s legacy sought to dismantle.

This concern is not merely theoretical. Empirical mapping of cultural cooperation

programmes demonstrates that many creative industry initiatives in Africa remain

shaped by external institutional frameworks. As Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen

research indicates, European-led programmes continue to dominate funding structures,

application procedures, and evaluative criteria, often privileging actors with access to

European languages and networks (Franco & Njogu, 2020). Such asymmetries raise

critical questions about local ownership and cultural sovereignty, suggesting that

creative industries may, under certain conditions, reproduce rather than dismantle neo-

colonial cultural dependencies.

Part V. Conclusion: Reinterpreting Creative and Cultural Industries

through Cabral’s Legacy — Culture as an Unfinished Liberation Project

Returning to Cabral’s intellectual legacy, culture has never been merely an expressive

domain or aesthetic dimension of social life; it constitutes the core of political legitimacy,

national subjectivity, and historical continuity (Cabral, 1970). In Cabral’s framework,

liberation is not completed with the achievement of political independence. Rather, it is

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

154

a prolonged historical process aimed at restructuring power, reclaiming epistemic

agency, and redefining social relations (Cabral, 1979). When this perspective is extended

to contemporary Lusophone Africa, the development of CCI emerges not only as an

economic strategy, but as the continuation of a much deeper political project.

From a developmental standpoint, creative industries undeniably open new possibilities

for African states. They generate employment, foster innovation, and strengthen global

visibility, thereby functioning simultaneously as economic capital, symbolic capital, and

knowledge capital (UNCTAD, 2024). UNESCO emphasizes that cultural production

contributes not only to economic diversification but also to social cohesion and democratic

participation (UNESCO, 2022). Similarly, Carlos Lopes argues that creative economies

can provide Africa with a “new development narrative,” helping it to move beyond

structural dependence on commodity exports and vulnerability to external shocks (Lopes,

2014/2015). In this sense, creative industries are not peripheral; they represent a

potential pillar in the reconstruction of African economic sovereignty.

Yet, drawing on Cabral’s thinking, it is clear that CCI do not automatically advance

decolonization. Cabral warns that liberation requires conscious, politically grounded

cultural agency rather than passive participation in inherited systems of power (Cabral,

1970). Whether creative industries can sustain this emancipatory role depends on several

decisive conditions.

First, culture must remain a foundation of political subjectivity rather than merely an

economic commodity. This tension has been clearly articulated by Lorenzo Moyo (2024),

who argues that African cultural policy is increasingly caught between “culture as praxis”

and “culture as commodity.” This implies that CCI policies should not be driven

exclusively by GDP metrics, export performance, or investor attractiveness. They must

instead address questions of meaning, ownership, and representation: whose culture is

being produced, for what audiences, and under which power conditions (UNESCO, 2022;

Yúdice, 2003). If culture is reduced to an economic tool, it risks losing the transformative

political force Cabral envisioned. If instead it is recognized as a site of agency and identity

formation, CCI remain aligned with liberation logics.

Second, creative economies must contribute to reducing inequality and advancing

epistemic decolonization. Empirical evidence from African cultural industries further

confirms that structural dependency remains a defining feature of the sector. Paulo

Alexandre Ivo Franco and Njogu (2020) demonstrate that many cultural initiatives in

Sub-Saharan Africa continue to rely heavily on externally funded institutional

ecosystems, often shaped by donor priorities and transnational gatekeeping structures.

Lopes cautions that Africa faces a “self-deception trap” when development narratives

celebrate potential while ignoring structural constraints and power asymmetries (Lopes,

2024). Thus, CCI must be supported by institutional reforms encompassing labor

protections, fair remuneration, intellectual property enforcement, and inclusive

participation mechanisms, particularly for marginalized cultural communities (UNESCO,

2019/2022). Success in creative industries should therefore be evaluated not only

through economic indicators, but through their capacity to promote social justice,

redistribute opportunity, and democratize cultural knowledge.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

155

Third, creative industries must cultivate historical consciousness and strategic autonomy.

For Cabral, the ultimate goal of liberation is not merely replacing colonial actors with

national elites, but constructing social systems that break with colonial logic (Cabral,

1979). In the Lusophone African context, this challenge is further complicated by

transnational cultural circulation. As Fernando Arenas (2011) shows, post-independence

Lusophone African cultural production is deeply embedded in transnational circuits that

simultaneously expand visibility and reinforce asymmetrical relations of recognition and

access. Following this line of thought, African creative economies must resist becoming

simple extensions of global cultural markets. Instead, they should aspire to articulate

alternative cultural modernities, build endogenous ecosystems of production and

knowledge, and assert interpretive control over African narratives (Lopes, 2015;

UNCTAD, 2024).

The trajectories of Lusophone Africa demonstrate both the promise and profound

ambivalence embedded in CCI. On the one hand, they offer pathways toward

diversification, agency, and global visibility. On the other hand, when inadequately

regulated or captured by market-centric paradigms, they risk becoming new channels

through which global capitalism reshapes local identities and reproduces hierarchies of

value (Lopes, 2024; UNESCO, 2022). The central question, therefore, is not whether

African states should pursue creative economy strategies, but how they do so, and under

whose terms.

Finally, hen interpreted through Cabral’s lens, creative and cultural industries should not

be viewed as marginal “post-independence sectors,” but as a contemporary arena where

the unfinished project of liberation continues to unfold (Cabral, 1970; Lopes, 2015;

UNCTAD, 2024). If creatively governed, they can strengthen sovereignty, expand

agency, and sustain cultural dignity. If left to the logics of commodification alone, they

risk binding postcolonial societies into renewed cycles of dependency and symbolic

subordination. The enduring urgency of Cabral’s legacy lies precisely here: culture

persists not as ornament or entertainment, but as a decisive terrain upon which freedom,

autonomy, and future African development will be determined.

References

Arenas, F. (2011). Lusophone Africa: beyond independence. U of Minnesota Press.

Baker, C. (Ed.). (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Popular Music and Politics of the

Balkans. Taylor & Francis.

Benson, C. J. (2000). The primary bilingual education experiment in Mozambique, 1993

to 1997. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 3(3), 149-166.

Bucaioni, M. (2023). A Transnational Canon of African Literatures in Portuguese?: Mia

Couto, José Eduardo Agualusa and the Circulation of Lusophone African

Literature. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 10(2), 162-177.

Cabral, A. (1970). National liberation and culture. Speech delivered at Syracuse

University, February 20, 1970.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

156

Cabral, A. (1979). Unity and struggle: Speeches and writings of Amílcar Cabral. Monthly

Review Press.

Chabal, P., & Daloz, J. P. (1999). Africa works: Disorder as political instrument.

Chabal, P., Birmingham, D., Forrest, J., & Newitt, M. (2002). A history of postcolonial

Lusophone Africa. Indiana University Press.

Curington, C. V. (2017). Negotiating Race, Work and Family: Cape Verdean Home Care

Workers in Lisbon, Portugal.

Davis, S., Straubhaar, J., & Ferin Cunha, I. (2016). The construction of a transnational

Lusophone media space: A historiographic analysis. Popular Communication, 14(4), 212-

223.

dos Santos, D. A. (2023). Bisnetos de Cabral, a Viagem de uma Designer: uma Reflexão

Sobre Narrativas Gráficas e Visuais de Cabo Verde e Sua Diáspora (Master's thesis,

Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (Portugal).

Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.

Fernandes, C. (2023). Intellectual legacies, political morality, and disillusionment:

connections between two Mozambique research institutions, 1976–2017. The Journal of

African History, 64(1), 112-125.

Ferreira, C. O. (2012). Ambivalent transnationality: Luso-African co-productions after

independence (1988–2010). Journal of African cinemas, 3(2), 221-245.

Figueira, C., Ivo Franco, P. A., Martins, C., Fortez, I., Henderson, M., Pegado, G., ... &

Quintana, C. (2023). Mapping the cultural and creative industries in Angola. United

Nations.

Franco, P. A. I., & Njogu, K. (2020). Cultural and creative industries supporting activities

in Sub-Saharan Africa: Mapping and analysis. Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen (ifa).

https://doi.org/10.17901/AKBP1.07.2020

Helgesson, S., & Stella, M. G. (2023). The Luso-African literary world:

introduction. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 10(2), 139-147.

Joffe, A., & Wangusa, A. (2022). Promoting Decent Work in the African Cultural and

Creative Economy, prepared for the ILO. Forthcoming September.

Leandro, F. J. B., Martínez-Galán, E., & Gonçalves, P. (2019). Portuguese-speaking

Small Island Developing States the Development Journeys of Cabo Verde, São Tomé

and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. Environmental Science.

Leandro, F. J., Beja, C., & Lu, Y. (Eds.). (2022). China, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique

and São Tomé and Príncipe: From Sporadic Bilateral Exchanges to a Comprehensive

Multilateral Platform. City University of Macau.

Lopes, C. (2014). Creativity is the new money. United Nations / Africa Renewal Policy

Series.

Lopes, C. (2015). How can Africa profit from its creative industries? United Nations

Economic Commission for Africa.

JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations

e-ISSN: 1647-7251

VOL. 17 Nº. 1, TD 4

Thematic Dossier – From Colonial Rule to Nationhood:

Amílcar Cabral and the Birth of Lusophone Africa

October 2026, pp. 130-157

From Cultural Liberation to Creative and Cultural Industries: Cabral’s Legacy and Economic

Autonomy in Lusophone Africa

Amelie Lu Yuqing

157

Lopes, C. (2024). The self-deception trap: How Africa underdevelops Africa. Tafelberg.

Lourenço-Lindell, I. (2002). Walking the tight rope: Informal livelihoods and social

networks in a West African city (Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis

Stockholmiensis).

Lundy, B. D. (2015). Trading on the margins: locating continuities of exchange in

Guinea-Bissau. African Identities, 13(2), 111-128.

Mazrui, A. (1990). Cultural forces in world politics. James Currey.

Moyo, L. (2024). Cultural policy and cultural industries in Africa: From culture as

commodity to culture as praxis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Senghor, L. S. (1964). On African socialism. Praeger.

Signé, L. (2025). The Outsized Potential of the Cultural and Creative Industries in Africa.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2018). Creative

economy outlook: Trends in international trade in creative industries. United Nations.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2024). Creative

economy outlook 2024. United Nations. Retrieved from

https://unctad.org/publication/creative-economy-outlook-2024

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2013).

Creative economy report 2013: Special edition, widening local development pathways.

UNESCO.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2019).

Culture and public policy for sustainable development.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2022).

Reshaping policies for creativity: Addressing culture as a global public good. UNESCO

Publishing.

World Bank. (n.d.). Guinea-Bissau. World Bank Data. Retrieved from

https://data.worldbank.org/country/guinea-bissau

Yúdice, G. (2003). The expediency of culture: Uses of culture in the global era. Duke

University Press.