OBSERVARE
Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026
22
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: NAVIGATING
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
SÉRGIO SILVA
D012196@umaia.pt
University Professor in the scientific areas related to Mathematics, Statistics and Computer
Science at University of Maia UMAIA (Portugal). He holds a PhD in Intelligent and Adaptable
Software Systems from the University of Vigo and a Master's and Bachelor's degree in
Mathematics from the University of Minho. He has several publications that include book
chapters, articles and conferences. His research focus is the application of Artificial Intelligence
and Information and Communication Technologies in various areas of society, namely Education,
Law, Industry, Health and Web Marketing. In addition, he has extensive professional experience
in academic and business projects involving the transfer of scientific and technological
knowledge.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the field of International Relations (IR) by reshaping
diplomacy, security, and global governance. This article employs a descriptive-analytical
methodology, systematically reviewing and synthesizing existing literature to analyse AI’s
applications and implications in IR. It explores AI's potential to enhance diplomatic decision-
making through predictive analytics and automated negotiation systems, as well as its
applications in cybersecurity and military technologies. The article also highlights the ethical
and regulatory challenges posed by AI, such as algorithmic bias, weaponization, and
disparities in global access to AI technologies. While AI offers innovative solutions for global
challenges, such as climate change and public health, its integration into the global system
demands robust international frameworks and ethical safeguards. Recommendations include
promoting equitable AI access, fostering international cooperation, and leveraging AI for
peacebuilding and sustainable development. This article contributes to the growing discourse
on the intersection of AI and IR, emphasizing the need for responsible and inclusive global
governance.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, International Relations, Diplomacy, Cybersecurity, Governance.
Resumo
A Inteligência Artificial (IA) está a transformar o campo das Relações Internacionais (RI),
remodelando a diplomacia, a segurança e a governança global. Este artigo emprega uma
metodologia descritiva-analítica, revendo e sintetizando sistematicamente a literatura
existente para analisar as aplicações e implicações da IA nas RI. Explora o potencial da IA
para melhorar a tomada de decisões diplomáticas através de análises preditivas e sistemas
de negociação automatizados, bem como as suas aplicações em cibersegurança e tecnologias
militares. O artigo também destaca os desafios éticos e regulatórios impostos pela IA, como
viés algorítmico, militarização e disparidades no acesso global às tecnologias de IA. Embora
a IA ofereça soluções inovadoras para desafios globais, como alterações climáticas e saúde
pública, a sua integração no sistema global exige estruturas internacionais robustas e
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
23
salvaguardas éticas. As recomendações incluem a promoção do acesso equitativo à IA, o
fomento da cooperação internacional e o aproveitamento da IA para a construção da paz e o
desenvolvimento sustentável. Este artigo contribui para o crescente discurso sobre a
interseção entre IA e RI, enfatizando a necessidade de uma governança global responsável e
inclusiva.
Palavras-chave
Inteligência Artificial, Relações Internacionais, Diplomacia, Cibersegurança, Governança.
How to cite this article
Silva, Sérgio (2025). Artificial Intelligence and International Relations: Navigating Opportunities
and Challenges in Global Governance. Janus.net, e-journal of international relations. VOL. 16, Nº.
2, November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39. DOI https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.16.2.2
Article submitted on 21st January 2025 and accepted for publication on 8th September
2025.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
24
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS:
NAVIGATING OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
SÉRGIO SILVA
Introduction
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about transformative
changes across various sectors, including healthcare, education, finance, and
governance. In the realm of International Relations (IR), AI is emerging as a notable
change, influencing how states interact, negotiate, and respond to global challenges. By
automating complex processes, analysing vast amounts of data, and providing actionable
insights, AI has the potential to enhance decision-making, improve diplomatic outcomes,
and address pressing global issues such as climate change and pandemics.
However, these advancements come with significant challenges. The integration of AI
into IR raises ethical dilemmas, such as algorithmic bias and the potential misuse of AI
in autonomous weapons and surveillance. Moreover, disparities in AI adoption and
technological capability among nations risk widening the global development gap, leading
to unequal power dynamics in the international system. As such, the use of AI in IR is
not merely a technological shift but a complex socio-political evolution that requires
careful governance and collaboration.
This article employs a descriptive-analytical methodology, systematically reviewing
existing literature and case studies. The ideas of other authors have been organized
thematically into domains such as diplomacy, security, digital public diplomacy,
cybersecurity, and global governance. This approach allows for a clear synthesis of
theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and policy implications, while highlighting
emerging trends and challenges (Fatai et al., 2023, p. 2030; Galliano et al., 2024, pp.
36-37).
AI in Diplomacy and Decision-Making
AI has begun to revolutionize diplomacy by introducing tools that streamline decision-
making and enhance diplomatic outcomes. By processing vast datasets and providing
actionable insights, AI is enabling diplomats and policymakers to respond more
effectively to global challenges.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
25
Predictive Analytics in Diplomacy
Predictive analytics is one of the most transformative applications of AI in diplomacy,
enabling states to anticipate global challenges and take pre-emptive actions. By
analysing large datasets, predictive models driven by AI identify trends and provide
actionable insights, helping policymakers make informed decisions in complex
international scenarios (Fatai et al., 2023, pp. 2032-2035).
Anticipating Crises and Conflicts
AI-powered predictive tools are particularly valuable in crisis anticipation and conflict
prevention. By integrating historical data, social media trends, economic indicators, and
real-time intelligence, these systems can identify early warning signs of potential crises.
For example, the European Union’s Early Warning System employs machine learning
algorithms to monitor risk factors such as political instability, migration patterns, and
economic shocks. This system enables timely interventions that mitigate the risk of
escalation and reduce the humanitarian and political costs of crises (Galliano et al., 2024,
pp. 40-42).
Enhancing Policy Formulation
Predictive analytics supports policymaking based on evidence by simulating the outcomes
of various strategies. Through scenario modelling, AI allows diplomats to explore
potential consequences of decisions in areas such as trade negotiations, conflict
resolution, and climate agreements. For instance, AI models can simulate the impact of
economic sanctions on a target nation’s stability, enabling policymakers to choose
strategies with the desired outcomes while minimizing unintended consequences (Bali &
Rapelanoro, 2021, p. 28).
Case Studies in Predictive Analytics
The United Nations Global Pulse initiative exemplifies the use of AI in humanitarian
diplomacy. By leveraging big data and predictive analytics, the program forecasts crises
such as food shortages, disease outbreaks, and refugee movements, facilitating
international aid coordination. Similarly, systems driven by AI have been used to identify
patterns of disinformation campaigns that threaten democratic processes, allowing states
to respond proactively (Manor, 2019, pp. 83-101).
Challenges and Ethical Considerations
Despite its advantages, predictive analytics in diplomacy faces significant challenges. The
quality of predictions depends heavily on the availability and accuracy of data. Incomplete
or biased datasets can lead to flawed forecasts, undermining decision-making processes.
Moreover, the use of predictive tools raises ethical concerns, such as privacy violations
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
26
and the potential misuse of predictive insights for coercive or manipulative purposes
(Helbing, 2015, p. 12).
Another crucial challenge concerns the quality and representativeness of the data on
which AI systems rely. In diplomacy and conflict prediction, biased or incomplete datasets
can distort forecasts, leading to misguided or unjust outcomes. For instance, when
predictive models rely predominantly on data from developed countries, they risk
neglecting the political and cultural specificities of the Global South, thereby reinforcing
existing inequalities in global governance (Montgomery, 2024, pp. 56). Helbing (2015,
p. 12) similarly warns that the unchecked use of incomplete data may amplify algorithmic
bias and erode trust in policy processes driven by AI. Ensuring transparency in data
provenance and promoting human oversight are thus critical to maintaining legitimacy
and accountability in decision-making assisted by AI.
Automated Negotiation Systems
Automated negotiation systems powered by AI are revolutionizing the way international
agreements and conflict resolutions are approached. These systems utilize sophisticated
algorithms to analyse data, evaluate stakeholders' preferences, and recommend optimal
solutions. By enhancing efficiency and reducing bias, platforms driven by AI are proving
to be valuable tools in diplomatic and multilateral negotiation processes (Katsh &
Rabinovich-Einy, 2017, pp. 50-52).
Enhancing Multilateral Negotiations
In multilateral negotiations, where diverse interests and complex trade-offs often
challenge consensus, AI systems provide a structured and efficient approach. Automated
negotiation platforms analyse data from all parties, model preferences, and simulate
possible outcomes to identify win-win scenarios. These tools have been particularly
effective in trade negotiations, climate agreements, and disputes sharing resource,
offering solutions that balance conflicting priorities (Bjola & Manor, 2024, pp. 1-6).
Data-Driven Decision Support
AI systems enhance human negotiators' capabilities by identifying patterns and
generating recommendations based on evidence. For instance, an AI system might
evaluate economic data, political alliances, and cultural dynamics to suggest negotiation
strategies tailored to specific contexts. These platforms reduce the time required for data
analysis, allowing diplomats to focus on high-level decision-making (Manor, 2019, pp.
83-101).
Case Studies in Automated Negotiation
One example of automated negotiation systems in action is the development of AI tools
for trade dispute resolution in the World Trade Organization (WTO). AI algorithms
evaluate historical data on trade conflicts, analyse the legal frameworks involved, and
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
27
propose resolutions that align with international laws and stakeholders' interests.
Similarly, in environmental diplomacy, tools driven by AI tools have been used to
facilitate agreements on carbon emissions by modelling the economic impact of various
policy options for participating nations (Manor, 2019, pp. 83-101).
Mitigating Bias and Enhancing Transparency
By relying on data and algorithmic processes, automated negotiation systems aim to
minimize the influence of human bias. These systems can enhance transparency in
negotiations by providing a clear rationale for suggested outcomes, helping to build trust
among parties. Additionally, they ensure that less influential states or parties have access
to objective data-driven support, levelling the playing field in global diplomacy (Uslu,
2024, pp. 160-162).
Digital Public Diplomacy
Digital public diplomacy, driven by AI, has become a vital tool for states seeking to shape
international narratives, engage with foreign publics, and influence global perceptions.
By leveraging analytics and communication platforms driven by AI, governments can
monitor sentiment, craft targeted messages, and respond dynamically to global issues in
real time (Manor, 2019, pp. 83-101).
Sentiment Analysis and Public Opinion Monitoring
Tools powered by AI enable governments to analyse vast volumes of data from social
media, news platforms, and online forums. Sentiment analysis algorithms assess public
opinion, identifying trends, grievances, and areas of interest across diverse populations.
For instance, during major international events or crises, governments can use AI to
gauge global reactions and adapt their diplomatic messaging accordingly (Manor, 2019,
pp. 55-56). These insights allow diplomats to align their strategies with public sentiment,
fostering more effective engagement with international audiences.
Real-Time Engagement
AI enhances real-time engagement through chatbots and automated communication
systems. These tools can respond promptly to public inquiries about policies, providing
accurate and consistent information. For example, virtual assistants deployed by foreign
ministries driven by AI can interact with citizens and foreigners alike, clarifying visa
regulations, travel advisories, or foreign policy initiatives. This accessibility builds trust
and transparency, enhancing a state's image on the global stage (Kosack & Fung, 2014,
pp. 67-69).
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
28
Targeted Messaging and Influence Campaigns
Digital public diplomacy relies on AI's ability to segment audiences and tailor messages
to specific demographics. By analysing behavioural patterns, AI tools help governments
create personalized campaigns that resonate with target audiences. For example, in
promoting climate policies or human rights initiatives, AI algorithms can identify
influential social media users and craft messages that align with their interests and
values. This precision amplifies the impact of diplomatic efforts, ensuring messages reach
the right audiences at the right time (Bjola & Manor, 2024, pp. 1-6).
Case Studies in Digital Public Diplomacy
The use of AI in public diplomacy is exemplified by the United Kingdom’s Foreign,
Commonwealth & Development Office, which employs AI tools to track online discourse
and measure the effectiveness of its campaigns. Similarly, the U.S. Department of State
has utilized AI to counter disinformation campaigns by identifying false narratives and
promoting verified information through digital channels (Bontridder & Poullet, 2021, pp.
1-21).
AI in Security and Conflict
AI is increasingly playing a pivotal role in enhancing national and global security, as well
as in addressing complex conflict scenarios. AI's capabilities in data analysis, predictive
modelling, and automation are being harnessed to improve both defensive and offensive
strategies in security and conflict management. However, its use also raises significant
ethical concerns and risks, particularly regarding autonomy, accountability, and the
potential for misuse in warfare (Chauhan, 2022, pp. 17-24).
AI in Military Strategy and Defense
AI is transforming military strategies by enabling faster, more accurate decision-making
and enhancing operational effectiveness. Advanced AI systems are now being integrated
into defense systems, from autonomous drones to cyber defense operations.
Autonomous vehicles and drones equipped with AI can perform surveillance,
reconnaissance, and even targeted strikes without direct human intervention, offering
enhanced efficiency and reduced human risk in conflict zones (Négyesi, 2024, pp. 475-
476).
For example, the United States and China have heavily invested in defense technologies
driven by AI, including autonomous weapons systems and surveillance tools powered by
AI. These systems can process large datasets to detect potential threats, such as troop
movements or weapon deployments, faster than human analysts, providing significant
strategic advantages (Chauhan, 2022, pp. 17-24).
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
29
AI in Conflict Prediction and Early Warning Systems
AI is also being deployed to predict and prevent conflicts before they escalate. Machine
learning algorithms can analyse historical data, geopolitical patterns, and social media
activity to detect early signs of unrest or potential violence. This predictive capability
allows international organizations, such as the United Nations (UN), to intervene before
a conflict fully materializes, mitigating the loss of life and economic disruption
(Henningsen, 2023, pp. 141-164).
For example, AI systems are used in early warning systems that monitor for social unrest,
such as protests, civil wars, or political instability. These systems analyse data from
various sources, including news reports, social media, and economic indicators, to predict
where conflicts might arise. The United Nations' use of AI to monitor refugee flows or
predict conflict hotspots in Africa is one example of this approach in action. These
predictive tools enable timely interventions and the provision of humanitarian assistance
before the situation deteriorates (Henningsen, 2023, pp. 141-164).
AI in Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare
AI is increasingly central to the field of cybersecurity, where it is used to detect and
respond to cyber threats in real-time. With the growing threat of cyberattacks on critical
infrastructure, AI systems are used to identify potential vulnerabilities in computer
networks, prevent hacking attempts, and protect sensitive information. These systems
can autonomously monitor network traffic, detect unusual behaviour, and deploy
defensive measures more quickly than human analysts.
In the context of cyber warfare, AI is also used to launch sophisticated cyberattacks.
Malware driven by AI can adapt and evolve to bypass security measures, making it
difficult for traditional defense to counter such threats. The use of AI in offensive cyber
capabilities, such as launching automated cyberattacks on enemy infrastructure, raises
concerns about the escalation of conflicts in the digital realm.
For instance, the use of AI in the 2020 cyberattacks on major governmental agencies,
such as the SolarWinds attack, demonstrates the increasing sophistication of cyber
warfare tactics powered by AI. The attack, attributed to hackers backed by Russian,
involved the use of AI to infiltrate supply chains and government networks, highlighting
the vulnerabilities that AI can both protect and exploit (Jasper, 2022, pp. 5-6).
AI and Global Governance
AI is increasingly influencing the landscape of global governance, offering new tools for
managing complex transnational issues such as climate change, global health, migration,
and international trade. However, while AI has the potential to enhance global
cooperation, it also introduces significant challenges regarding regulation, ethics, and the
distribution of power on the global stage. Governments, international organizations, and
non-state actors are working together to shape the future of AI governance to ensure
that its benefits are equitably distributed, while minimizing risks and ensuring human
rights protections.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
30
AI in Global Policy Coordination
AI has the capacity to transform international policy coordination by facilitating the
collection, analysis, and sharing of data across borders. Tools powered by AI can process
vast amounts of data in real-time, helping governments and international organizations
respond more quickly to global challenges such as pandemics, natural disasters, and
environmental threats.
For example, climate models driven by AI are being used to predict the impact of climate
change across different regions, guiding international efforts to mitigate its effects. These
models allow the international community to better understand and anticipate the long-
term consequences of environmental changes, leading to more informed negotiations in
climate summits like the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC) (Pereira & Viola, 2020, pp. 15-16). Similarly, AI tools have been used in health
governance to track and predict the spread of infectious diseases, facilitating coordinated
global responses to pandemics such as COVID-19 (Kaur et al., 2021, pp. 40523-40525).
By analysing data from various countries, AI systems can offer recommendations for
targeted interventions and resource allocation, improving the effectiveness of global
health governance.
AI and Multilateral Institutions
International organizations like the United Nations (UN), World Trade Organization
(WTO), and World Health Organization (WHO) are exploring the use of AI to improve
their operations, increase transparency, and enhance decision-making. AI can be used
to streamline administrative processes, support decision-making driven by AI, and
facilitate the monitoring of international agreements. The UN, for example, has invested
in AI projects to strengthen peacekeeping and humanitarian response. AI is employed to
monitor conflict zones, predict refugee flows, and assess the impact of sanctions or peace
agreements. AI tools have also been used by the UN to combat misinformation and
disinformation, analysing social media platforms to detect the spread of harmful
narratives that could undermine peace efforts or create instability (Kertysova, 2018, pp.
60-62).
Similarly, AI can enhance global trade governance by helping institutions like the WTO
predict market trends and evaluate trade disputes. By automating routine processes and
offering advanced analysis, AI helps multilateral organizations become more efficient and
adaptive in responding to fast-changing global challenges (Bjola & Manor, 2024, pp. 1-
6).
AI in International Law and Regulation
The rise of AI poses new questions for international law, particularly in the areas of
regulation, accountability, and jurisdiction. One of the key challenges for global
governance is the establishment of international norms and rules for the development
and deployment of AI technologies. Unlike traditional international treaties, AI
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
31
governance requires flexible frameworks that can keep pace with rapid technological
advancements.
In this context, international collaboration is critical to creating consistent, enforceable
standards for AI deployment. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU) have already taken steps toward
establishing guidelines and regulations for AI, focusing on areas such as data privacy,
algorithmic transparency, and ethical AI use. For example, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence
Act, proposed in 2021, aims to regulate AI systems with elevated risk by ensuring that
they are transparent, accountable, and respectful of fundamental rights (Neuwirth, 2022,
pp. 20-25).
While initiatives such as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act represent important progress
toward regulating systems with elevated risk, they also expose the limits of current
governance approaches. Neuwirth (2022, pp. 2025) argues that although the Act
prioritizes transparency and accountability, enforcement mechanisms remain fragmented
and uneven across jurisdictions. Khalaileh (2023, pp. 2527) stresses that the fast-paced
nature of AI innovation challenges the ability of international law to adapt effectively. If
regulatory frameworks remain fragmented, the result may be competing and
incompatible approaches to AI governance, undermining efforts to build coherent
international standards.
AI, Sovereignty, and Global Power Dynamics
AI also brings questions of sovereignty and power dynamics to the forefront of global
governance discussions. So, countries race to develop cutting-edge AI technologies, the
ability to control and regulate AI becomes a key source of geopolitical influence. Nations
with advanced AI capabilities may gain economic, military, and diplomatic leverage,
which could alter existing power dynamics in global governance.
For instance, the competition between the United States and China in AI development is
not just a matter of technological innovation but also reflects broader geopolitical
tensions. The control over AI technologies can affect a country’s influence in international
organizations, its ability to shape global norms, and its strategic interests in areas like
cybersecurity and trade. As AI becomes a critical component of economic and military
power, questions arise about how AI will impact state sovereignty, international law, and
global cooperation (Grochmalski, 2020, pp. 7-9).
The introduction of AI in global governance requires balancing the interests of powerful
states with the need for cooperation, inclusivity, and fairness. There must be mechanisms
in place to ensure that AI is used to foster collaboration and collective action, rather than
to reinforce inequality or exacerbate global tensions.
The Future of AI in Global Governance
Looking ahead, the integration of AI into global governance will likely continue to expand,
creating both opportunities and challenges for the international community. AI has the
potential to enhance cooperation on pressing global issues, including climate change,
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
32
health crises, and conflict prevention. However, its use also requires careful regulation
and ethical oversight to prevent abuses and ensure equitable benefits for all.
International governance frameworks must evolve to address the unique challenges
posed by AI. This will involve global dialogue, collaboration between governments,
international organizations, the private sector, and civil society, as well as the
development of robust legal and ethical standards. AI should not only be seen as a tool
for enhancing governance but as an integral part of shaping the future of global
cooperation in the 21st century (Imamguluyev, 2024, pp. 2938-2940).
Risks and Ethical Implications
While AI offers numerous benefits in various domains of global governance, security, and
diplomacy, its application also carries significant risks and ethical dilemmas. The advent
of AI technologies brings forth challenges related to weaponization, misinformation,
inequality, and the erosion of privacy. These risks require careful regulation, ethical
oversight, and international cooperation to ensure that AI is used responsibly and in ways
that benefit all of humanity, rather than exacerbating existing global divides or
threatening global peace and stability (Howard, Woolley, & Calo, 2018, pp. 85-87;
Sedova et al., 2021, pp. 7-9).
Weaponization and Misinformation
AI’s ability to rapidly process and generate content is a double-edged sword, particularly
when it comes to weaponizing information and manipulating public perception.
Technologies driven by AI, including bots, deepfakes, and automated content generation,
can be used to spread misinformation and disinformation at an unprecedented scale. This
poses severe risks to democracy, international relations, and social cohesion.
Bots generated by AI bots have been deployed to interfere in political processes,
influencing elections, spreading propaganda, and deepening societal divides. For
instance, AI bots were used in the 2016 U.S. election to amplify divisive narratives and
influence public opinion (Howard, Woolley, & Calo, 2018, pp. 88-90). These campaigns
are often designed to create polarization, sow distrust in democratic institutions, and
undermine the integrity of electoral systems.
The manipulation of information through AI also extends to the creation of deepfake
videos, which can be used to spread false narratives, discredit political figures, or incite
violence. The ability to produce convincing, yet entirely fabricated, content with minimal
resources presents a major challenge to verifying the truth and preventing the spread of
harmful misinformation on a global scale.
In the context of international relations, misinformation campaigns driven by AI can be
used to destabilize governments, interfere with diplomatic efforts, and even incite
conflicts between states (Sedova et al., 2021, pp. 10-12). The weaponization of AI in the
form of digital manipulation could become an increasingly common tactic in cyber
warfare, posing a significant challenge to global security.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
33
To address these threats, countries and international organizations must collaborate on
developing frameworks to regulate the use of AI in information warfare, establish clear
accountability for those who exploit AI for malicious purposes, and invest in technologies
to detect and counteract misinformation generated by AI.
Beyond the general threats of bots and deepfakes, AI introduces more insidious risks of
manipulation through personalized disinformation campaigns. Unlike traditional
propaganda, systems driven by AI can tailor narratives to specific demographics,
exploiting cultural and emotional triggers to maximize impact. For example, Manor
(2019, pp. 83101) notes that sentiment analysis powered by AI enables actors to
identify societal grievances and then deploy targeted messages to exacerbate
polarization. Bontridder and Poullet (2021, pp. 121) similarly highlight how automated
influence operations undermine democratic institutions and destabilize international
relations. These dynamics illustrate how disinformation campaigns powered by AI pose
a direct challenge not only to national security but also to international cooperation and
trust.
Inequalities in AI Access
While AI offers immense potential for addressing global challenges, there is a growing
concern over the disparities in access to AI technologies between developed and
developing countries. The digital divide is widening as wealthy nations and multinational
corporations dominate the development and deployment of AI, leaving low-income
countries with limited access to these transformative technologies. This inequality is
creating further imbalances in global power and exacerbating existing development
challenges.
In many developing nations, there are significant barriers to the adoption of AI, including
limited infrastructure, lack of access to quality data, insufficient technical expertise, and
inadequate financial resources. This creates a situation where only a few nations,
particularly those in the Global North, can harness the full potential of AI, while the rest
are left behind.
The unequal distribution of AI technologies risks perpetuating the existing global power
dynamics, where technologically advanced nations can leverage AI for economic growth,
military superiority, and political influence. In contrast, developing countries may be left
with limited access to AI's benefits, further deepening inequalities in areas such as
healthcare, education, and economic development (Montgomery, 2024, pp. 5-6).
For example, solutions in healthcare powered by AI, such as diagnostic tools and
personalized medicine, could improve patient outcomes and reduce health disparities in
developed countries. However, without proper infrastructure and access to these
technologies, many people in low-income regions will be unable to benefit from these
advancements. Similarly, AI’s potential to drive economic growth through automation
and data analysis may leave developing countries vulnerable to job displacement and
economic stagnation if they are unable to keep up with technological innovation.
Addressing these disparities requires international cooperation, capacity-building
initiatives, and the establishment of policies that promote the equitable distribution of AI
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
34
technologies. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) has emphasized the need for global cooperation to build the necessary
infrastructure, support education and skill development, and ensure that AI technologies
are accessible to all countries, regardless of their economic status (UNESCO, 2024).
One potential solution is the creation of an international framework that ensures fair
access to AI, fosters research collaboration between countries, and provides support for
developing countries to build the necessary infrastructure to take advantage of AI
technologies. This could include measures such as technology transfer, programs for
building capacity, and equitable funding for AI research and development in the Global
South.
Policy Recommendations
As AI continues to reshape global governance, international relations, and security, it is
crucial to develop policies that maximize the benefits of AI while mitigating its risks. AI’s
potential to enhance global cooperation and address pressing challenges, such as climate
change, public health, and conflict resolution, is immense. However, its impact can be
equally harmful if not properly regulated. In this section, several policy recommendations
are outlined to guide the development and deployment of AI in a way that ensures it
serves humanity’s best interests and fosters equitable and ethical global practices.
Establishing International Frameworks
Creating a unified framework for AI governance is essential to ensure the responsible
development and use of AI technologies. While AI innovation is rapidly advancing, the
legal and regulatory structures that govern its use remain fragmented, with different
countries establishing their own standards, often without coordinated international
oversight. This has created a scenario in which AI can be developed and deployed without
consistent ethical, legal, or social considerations across borders.
The UN or other international bodies should take the lead in creating global frameworks
for AI governance. These frameworks should include binding agreements on AI safety,
ethical standards, data privacy, transparency, and accountability, ensuring that AI
systems are used responsibly and equitably (UNESCO, 2024). A global treaty on AI could
set guidelines for ensuring that AI development prioritizes human rights, social justice,
and environmental sustainability.
The proposed framework should also focus on promoting inclusivity, ensuring that
developing countries have a voice in the governance process and are not left behind in
the AI revolution. International cooperation on AI could foster trust and create a
collaborative environment to address transnational challenges such as cybersecurity,
misinformation, and the ethical implications of AI in warfare (UNESCO, 2024).
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
35
Enhancing Transparency and Accountability
One of the key challenges with AI systems, particularly those in critical domains such as
defense, healthcare, and diplomacy, is the opacity of decision-making processes. Many
AI models are complex and operate as "black-box" systems, where even their developers
may struggle to explain how the algorithms arrive at decisions. This lack of transparency
is particularly concerning when AI systems are used in high-stakes areas, such as military
operations, law enforcement, and foreign policy decision-making.
To address these concerns, governments should mandate the use of explainable AI (XAI)
systems in these domains. XAI refers to AI systems designed to be transparent and
interpretable, so their actions can be understood and explained to non-expert users
(Khalaileh, 2023, pp. 25-27). By adopting XAI, governments can ensure that AI systems
operate in ways that are understandable, justifiable, and accountable. This will help
mitigate the risks of unintended consequences, bias, and algorithmic errors, while
fostering trust among the public and international stakeholders.
For example, in the defense sector, XAI can help ensure that military AI systems, such
as autonomous weapons or intelligence gathering systems, operate within ethical and
legal frameworks. Similarly, in diplomacy, XAI could help explain the reasoning behind
foreign policy decisions made with the assistance of AI, ensuring that they are
transparent and aligned with international law and norms (Khalaileh, 2023, pp. 28-30).
Promoting Capacity Building in Developing Nations
The global digital divide poses a significant challenge to the equitable adoption of AI
technologies. While developed countries have access to advanced AI tools and
infrastructure, many developing nations lack the resources, technical expertise, and
infrastructure to integrate AI into their governance and economic systems. This inequality
risks further marginalizing these nations, limiting their ability to benefit from AIs
potential in areas like healthcare, education, and economic development.
To address this gap, developed countries should prioritize technical and financial
assistance to help developing nations integrate AI technologies. Initiatives like the Global
Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI), which aims to support AI development
through international collaboration and capacity building, are a step in the right direction.
GPAI provides a platform for countries to collaborate on AI policy, ethics, and research,
while also ensuring that developing nations have the resources and support, they need
to implement AI solutions (Jariwala, 2024, pp. 1-7).
Efforts on building capacity should focus on developing local AI expertise, building the
necessary digital infrastructure, and ensuring access to the data and tools required for
successful AI adoption. Furthermore, international cooperation can help create training
programs, digital literacy initiatives, and collaborative research projects that enable
developing countries to leapfrog technological barriers and fully participate in the global
AI ecosystem (Jariwala, 2024, pp. 1-7).
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
36
Leveraging AI for Peacebuilding
AI’s potential to prevent conflict, promote stability, and contribute to peacebuilding
efforts should be actively pursued by international organizations and governments. AI
can be a powerful tool for early warning systems, conflict prevention, and post-conflict
reconstruction, especially when integrated with existing peacekeeping operations.
AI can be leveraged for conflict prevention by analysing large datasets from social media,
news outlets, and government reports to detect early warning signs of political instability,
ethnic tensions, or humanitarian crises. Predictive models powered by AI can help
diplomats and peacekeepers act pre-emptively to defuse conflicts before they escalate.
For example, AI could help identify patterns of violence in conflict-prone regions, enabling
international organizations like the UN to deploy peacekeeping forces or humanitarian
aid swiftly.
In addition, AI technologies can contribute to conflict resolution by facilitating dialogue
between opposing parties, analysing negotiation dynamics, and suggesting potential
compromise solutions. Automated negotiation platforms, powered by AI, can analyse the
preferences and positions of different stakeholders in peace negotiations, providing
diplomats with insights on how to bridge divides and reach a mutually agreeable solution
(Carneiro, Novais, & Neves, 2014, pp. 170-172).
Finally, AI can assist in post-conflict reconstruction by helping governments and
international agencies to rebuild infrastructure, improve governance, and promote social
cohesion. Tools driven by AI can optimize resource allocation, provide insights driven by
data for rebuilding efforts, and assess the effectiveness of various peacebuilding
programs (Carneiro, Novais, & Neves, 2014, pp. 173-175).
Conclusion
AI is undeniably a transformative force in the field of International Relations, bringing
new opportunities and challenges in areas such as diplomacy, security, and governance.
The potential for AI to enhance decision-making, improve conflict resolution, and
promote effective governance is vast. Predictive analytics, automated negotiation
systems, and digital diplomacy are just a few examples of how AI can significantly
reshape the way states interact and manage global affairs.
However, as AI technologies advance, their integration into the global order must be
approached with caution. Ethical concerns, such as the risk of weaponization,
misinformation, bias, and the widening digital divide, demand careful consideration.
These challenges highlight the need for robust regulatory frameworks that ensure AI is
developed and applied in ways that are transparent, equitable, and aligned with human
rights.
Furthermore, inclusivity is paramount. Wealthier nations or corporations should not
dominate the global AI landscape. Instead, international cooperation must be
emphasized, ensuring that developing countries have access to AI technologies and the
resources needed to integrate them into their own governance structures.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
37
Interpreting AI through established theories of international relations also enriches our
understanding of its role in global politics. From a realist perspective, the competition
between the United States and China over AI development illustrates how technological
leadership translates into geopolitical power. A liberal lens, by contrast, highlights the
potential of international organizations such as the UN, WTO, and UNESCO to foster
cooperation and collective governance of AI. Constructivist approaches, meanwhile, draw
attention to how AI technologies shape norms, perceptions, and identities in diplomacy
and global governance. These perspectives confirm that AI is not merely a technological
tool but also a political phenomenon that both reflects and reshapes power, cooperation,
and legitimacy in the international system.
By fostering collaboration between nations, international organizations, and the private
sector, and by establishing clear and inclusive policies, states can unlock AI's full potential
to promote peace, prosperity, and global stability. As AI continues to evolve, it will
undoubtedly shape the future of international relations. With careful oversight and a
commitment to ethical principles, AI can be a powerful tool for building a more just and
harmonious world.
References
Bali, M., & Rapelanoro, N. (2021). How to simulate international economic sanctions: A
multipurpose index modelling illustrated with EU sanctions against Russia. International
Economics, 168, 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2021.06.004
Bjola, C., & Manor, I. (2024). Digital diplomacy in the age of technological acceleration:
three impact scenarios of generative artificial intelligence. Place Branding and Public
Diplomacy, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-023-00323-4
Bontridder, N., & Poullet, Y. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation.
Data & Policy, 3, e32. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.20
Carneiro, D., Novais, P., & Neves, J. (2014). The Conflict Resolution Process. Conflict
Resolution and Its Context, 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06239-6_8
Chauhan, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence In The Military: An Overview Of The
Capabilities, Applications, And Challenges. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences,
9(2),17-24. https://doi.org/10.53555/sfs.v9i2.2911
European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Galliano, D., Bitussi, A., Caravaggi, I., De
Girolamo, L., Destro, D., Duta, A., Giustolisi, L., Lentini, A., Mastronunzio, M., Paris, S.,
Proietti, C., Salvitti, V., Santini, M., & Spagnolo, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence applied
to disasters and crises management, Publications Office of the European Union.
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/0323818
Grochmalski, P. (2020). US-China rivalry for strategic domination in the area of artificial
intelligence and the new AI geopolitics. Kwartalnik “Bellona,” 701(2), 5-25.
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3837
Helbing, D. (2015). Societal, Economic, Ethical and Legal Challenges of the Digital
Revolution: From Big Data to Deep Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and Manipulative
Technologies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2594352
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
38
Henningsen, G. (2023). Big Data for the Prediction of Forced Displacement. International
Migration Review, 59(1), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183231195296
Howard, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018). Algorithms, bots, and political
communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political
communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology
& Politics, 15(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735
Imamguluyev, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence 2050: Predictions, Challenges, and
Innovations. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(9), 2933-
2941. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0924.2663
Jariwala, M. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act:
Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance. International Journal of
Computer Applications, 186(38), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2024923954
JASPER, S. (2022). Russian Cyber Operations. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2k88t3d
Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital Justice.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190464585.001.0001
Kaur, I., Behl, T., Aleya, L., Rahman, H., Kumar, A., Arora, S., & Bulbul, I. J. (2021).
Artificial intelligence as a fundamental tool in management of infectious diseases and its
current implementation in COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Science and Pollution
Research, 28(30), 40515-40532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13823-8
Kertysova, K. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Disinformation. Security and Human
Rights, 29(1-4), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02901005
Khalaileh, Y. (2023). Accommodating Artificial Intelligence in International Law: An
Overview and New Frontier. Journal of Human Security, 19(1), 22-31.
https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2023.19010022
Kosack, S., & Fung, A. (2014). Does Transparency Improve Governance? Annual Review
of Political Science, 17(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-
144356
Lateef Olawale Fatai, Olayinka Farouk Salau, Lawrencia Yaa Kakra Gaisie, & Ken Muchira.
(2023). Leveraging data analytics to optimize government interventions for
homelessness, substance abuse, and mental health: A case study in evidence-based
policy design. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(3), 2025-2047.
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2218
Manor, I. (2019). Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age. Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-
2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14011032
Montgomery, R. M. (2024). The Rise of Inequality and Artificial Intelligence: Impacts,
Challenges, and Opportunities in a Globalized Economy.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4964094
Négyesi, I. (2024). The Potential of Cognitive Artificial Intelligence for Mission-Oriented
Military Decision-Making. Land Forces Academy Review, 29(4), 473-480.
https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2024-0049
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL. 16, Nº. 2
November 2025-April 2026, pp. 22-39
Artificial Intelligence and International Relations:
Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Governance
Sérgio Silva
39
Neuwirth, R. J. (2022). The European Union’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA).
The EU Artificial Intelligence Act, 9-41. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003319436-2
Pereira, J. C., & Viola, E. (2020). Climate Multilateralism Within the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate
Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.639
Sedova, K., McNeill, C., Johnson, A., Joshi, A., & Wulkan, I. (2021). AI and the Future of
Disinformation Campaigns: Part 1: The RICHDATA Framework. Center for Security and
Emerging Technology. https://doi.org/10.51593/2021ca005
UNESCO. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org
Uslu, S. (2024). Data-Informed Diplomacy: Adapting to the Digital Age in International
Relations and Implementation in the OSCE Region. Digital Diplomacy in the OSCE Region,
155-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50966-7_14