instances of risks and protective factors. Lastly is experimental evidence. This factor acts
as an intervention for prevention of psychological, health problems or behavioral issues
and this results in positive development. Goodwin et al., (2017) state that nurturing in
Los Angeles catered for caring, supportiveness, playfulness, and pleasure helps
individuals to thrive and this was more centered in families. Early & Development,
(2019) states that enable communities and caregivers to ensure children’s good health
and nutrition, protect them from threats, and give them opportunities for early learning
through interactions that are emotionally supportive and responsive.
Habimana, (2024) states that curriculum development and implementation should cater
for physical, emotional, social, moral, and intellectual development of students. Yusoff,
et al.., (2018) in their study done on both primary and secondary school children in
Malaysia state that curriculum should involve caring, collaboration skills, critical, creative
and communication skills through all the subjects taught at these levels. (Gehlbach &
Hough, (2018) state that curriculum should capture elements of self-awareness, self-
management, responsible decision making, social responsibility and relationship
management.
A study by Ab Razak, (2020) highlights the foundational principles of humanistic theories,
emphasizing that human growth and development revolve around aspects: love,
creativity, loneliness and personal growth. These traits form the cornerstone of a well-
balanced personality, and evolve through a well-motivated process of self-discovery and
development. integrating these humanistic concepts into the educational curriculum is
crucial for nurturing individuals who can make to make informed choices based on
values, spirituality, curiosity and conscious awareness (Littlejohn et al.., 2019). This
approach fosters not only academic success but also the holistic development of learners.
However this ideal remains largely unachieved in many educational systems, including
Uganda. Ugandan graduates often exhibit significant gaps in theory and practical
applications necessary for well-rounded personality development. Addressing this
challenge requires a paradigm shift in educational practices, focusing more on a human
centred approach that prioritized personal growth alongside academic achievement.
Even though many scholars suggest different frameworks that curriculum development
and implementation should encapsulate, Uganda’ s education system over the years has
not produced the required humanity with elements of knowledge interwoven with both
hard and soft skills, values, attitudes and spirituality especially among the youths
(Kifuuse, 2024). This is because the government of Uganda has recently embarked on
retooling, nurturing and reshaping youths aspirations and mitigation of violent behavior
amongst them (Tukundane, Minnaert, Zeelen, & Kanyandago, 2015). To avert Uganda’s
education system, there is a need to re-conceptualize curriculum development and
implementation at all levels to nurture learners with a new mindset towards self and
community development.
Similarly, Miiro & Otham, (2018) in their paper talent management practices a trajectory
and ingenuity in higher education institutions; a meta-analysis review of literature
alluded that preparation of a holistic graduate requires a curriculum designed and tailored
with critical thinking, communication, innovation, problem solving, entrepreneurship and