Influencing Public Opinion and Shaping Attitudes
The media's utilization of narratives and frameworks can cultivate empathy and
compassion or incite fear and animosity. Studies indicate that humanitarian narratives
highlighting the pain and vulnerability of migrants can effectively garner public support
for aid and protection efforts (BBC, 2023). The residents of Aceh shown local solidarity
by supplying food, housing, and other necessities to the refugees. Civil society
organizations have organized to advocate for the rights and welfare of refugees
(Viartasiwi & Missbach, 2023). Conversely, narratives around security threats may lead
to negative attitudes, social isolation, and bias (VOA, 2023). Evidence of this
phenomenon is apparent in the augmented security measures adopted by government
entities, including heightened border checks, monitoring activities, and the creation of
refugee camps (Human Rights Watch, 2024).
The media influences public opinion of the Rohingya refugee crisis by selective
information presentation and emphasis on specific aspects, potentially fostering either
acceptance or hostility. The media's consistent focus on the humanitarian adversities
faced by refugees, encompassing detailed accounts of their obstacles and traumas,
fosters empathy and a sense of ethical obligation within the broader populace (BBC,
2023). The potency of these narratives fosters backing for humanitarian efforts,
contributions, and appeals for governmental intervention to safeguard and aid refugees.
Conversely, when the media disproportionately emphasizes potential security issues,
such as criminal behavior or cultural disparities, it engenders dread, worry, and animosity
throughout the populace (VOA, 2023).
The media's language and framing methods can profoundly affect public perception and
engagement with Rohingya refugees. Employing humanizing language, such as
"families," "children," and "individuals," can cultivate sentiments of connection and
empathy, prompting individuals to perceive refugees as fellow humans in need of
assistance (BBC, 2023). The employment of dehumanizing or criminalizing language,
such as โillegal immigrants,โ โinfiltrators,โ or โthreats,โ engenders notions of
exceptionalism and dread, leading to the stigmatization and marginalization of refugees
(VOA, 2023). The employment of this phrase can significantly influence public opinion,
affecting the perceived worthiness of refugees for empathy.
The media's portrayal of the Rohingya refugee crisis can significantly influence public
opinion and behavior over time. Consistent exposure to narratives that illustrate the
qualities, beneficial effects, and future potential of refugees helps foster a more inclusive
and open society (BBC, 2023). These narratives can challenge and eliminate prejudice,
promote understanding, and enhance public support for policies and programs that
facilitate the assimilation and empowerment of refugees. Conversely, the continual
consumption of news on security dangers perpetuates gloomy beliefs, exacerbates
prejudice, and obstructs the advancement of societal cohesion (VOA, 2023). The
enduring effects of media framing on public perceptions may influence the environment
for refugee reception and their opportunities for reintegration into host communities.
Our conclusion is that public opinion and overall acceptance of Rohingya refugees in Aceh
are significantly shaped by media decisions. They are obligated to provide unbiased,
precise, and thorough reports that consider the intricate realities of the refugee situation.