OBSERVARE
Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
Vol. 15, N.º 2
November 2024-April 2025
500
CRITICAL REVIEW
JOSEPHINE QUINN (2024). HOW THE WORLD MADE THE WEST: A 4,000-YEAR
HISTORY. BLOOMSBURY PUBLISHING. ISBN (HB): 978-1-5266-0518-4.
DANIEL CARDOSO
dcardoso@autonoma.pt
PhD in International Relations, Free University of Berlin. Associate Professor, Universidade
Autónoma de Lisboa (Portugal). Integrated researcher at the Instituto Português de
Relações Internacionais, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
In her book How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year History, Josephine Quinn
examines 4,000 years of the history of the Euro-Afro-Asiatic region, beginning in the
Levant in the 20th century BC and ending with Christopher Columbus's arrival in the
Americas in the 15th century AD. Professor of Ancient History at Oxford University, Quinn
is a renowned historian who has written other award-winning works such as In Search of
the Phoenicians (2017).
Quinn's analysis of 4000 years of history results in a book of more than 500 pages,
divided into 30 chapters, and makes fascinating reading. Although it has an academic
structure and includes bibliographic references, it will appeal to all types of reader on
account of the accessible writing style and use of concrete examples.
Based on her analysis of this lengthy period, Quinn arrives at the conclusion that Euro-
Afro-Asian history is essentially the sum of the contacts established by humans in this
region. In the book, the author exhaustively details these interactions, between
Phoenicians, Minoans, Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Carthaginians, Moors, Franks, and
Visigoths, among others. These contacts were of various types, including trade, culture,
diplomacy, and war, and it was through such interactions that societies were built and
evolved. A particularly instructive example of these dynamics is the alphabet. As Quinn
explains, the basis for today's alphabets was created in Egypt by Levantine workers in
the 18th or 19th century BC. Because the Egyptian writing system based on
hieroglyphics was quite complex, these workers invented a new, simpler system in
which each letter corresponded to a sound. By doing so, they created the first alphabet
in history. Contacts established by sea in the Mediterranean made it possible for this new
system to be disseminated and then adapted by other peoples in the region. This gave
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 15 N.º 2
November 2024-April 2025, pp. 500-504
Critical Review Josephine Quinn (2024). How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year
History. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN (hb): 978-1-5266-0518-4
Daniel Cardoso
501
rise to the alphabets of Latin, Greek and other languages of antiquity and the present
day. The same applies to the numerals we use. Although we now call these “Arabic,” they
are of Indian origin and were brought to Europe by people from North Africa in the 10th
century AD. Several important mathematical inventions such as the number “0” are also
of Indian origin. Quinn uses these examples to reveal that the idea of glocalization
(interaction between the local and the external) is a very ancient one. For the author,
this constant dialogue between peoples is what shaped societies and facilitated progress.
Quinn’s findings and conceptual conclusions have ramifications for Political Science and
International Relations. They are substantiated by extensive research which examines a
very wide range of primary and secondary sources. Her main argument is that, if history
is based on interactions, this means that the idea it was built on civilizations is wrong.
Civilization is generally assumed to refer to a broad group of people with common cultural
traits and values, thus forming part of a coherent whole. These traits and values are
group-specific and are used to distinguish the group from other groups with different
characteristics. However, this specificity, authenticity, and differentiation between groups
is something that the author does not encounter in her historical study of the 4000 years
in question. The interaction between the various peoples throughout this period meant
there was a tendency towards fluidity, co-creation and pollination. Thus, according to
Quinn, calling the Phoenicians, Greeks or Persians “civilizations” is incorrect because one
cannot identify characteristics in each which are essentially particular and distinctive.
Quinn adds that, at the time, these peoples did not regard themselves in this way. They
saw themselves as members of villages or cities rather than as part of a “civilization.” In
fact, the very concept of civilization only emerged in the 18th century.
If civilizations did not exist as such historically, why then do we speak, for example, of
“Western civilization”? This is the core of the author's academic and political reading. The
idea of the West as a distinct civilization is a construction that only prevailed for political
reasons. According to the author, this construction emerged after the campaigns to expel
Muslims and Jews from the European continent during the Middle Ages. It became
ideology in the eighteenth century based on what she calls “civilizational thinking.”
According to Quinn, this developed in two phases: singular and plural. In the first phase,
civilization is presented as an advanced stage of the development of societies. This
concept was introduced in around 1750 by French and British philosophers and forms
part of what we now call theories of social evolution. Viewed in this way, civilization is
the end point of the linear evolution of societies from more precarious forms of socio-
economic organization (nomadism and pastoralism) to more developed forms such as
commerce and industry. Quinn confirms this view by quoting John Stuart Mill, a
nineteenth-century British philosopher, who states that “In savage life there is no
commerce, no manufactures, no agriculture, or next to none: a country rich in the fruits
of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures, we call civilized” (page 3).
Civilization, in this singular sense, was theoretically a state to which any human society
could aspire with sufficient effort and education, and all human societies could be ranked
according to their success on this front. European authors, who were proponents of this
vision, presented Europe as the civilizational model to which others could aspire. As a
study of this era indicates, this abstract concept of civilization usefully supported Western
European imperialism. Mill, who worked for the British East India Company for more than
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 15 N.º 2
November 2024-April 2025, pp. 500-504
Critical Review Josephine Quinn (2024). How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year
History. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN (hb): 978-1-5266-0518-4
Daniel Cardoso
502
thirty years, argued that civilized peoples had a duty to help others on their own journey
down the same path (page 4). This ideology was captured by Rudyard Kipling in his poem
The White Man's Burden(1899), in which he sought to convince the American president
to colonize the Philippines in order to “civilize” it. Modern forms of this conceptualization
of a linear evolution can be found in liberal economics and politics theories such as the
“modernization theory” developed by Walt Whitman Rostow in his book The Stages of
Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (1991).
The second phase, which Quinn refers to as plural, appeared in the nineteenth century
under the influence of the French historian and politician François Guizot. According to
him, civilization not only referred to a stage of social evolution, but also to a specific
human group from a specific location, with its own particular history and attributes, within
which development was an endogenous process. In the light of this definition, there was
not only “civilization,” but “civilizations,” that is, Indian, Greek, Roman, among many
others. According to Guizot, these groups could be defined as civilizations because they
had particular and essential attributes that distinguished them from one another. Thus,
the academic's mission was to identify these attributes, which could imply studying the
origin of civilizations, their ancestral roots. Quinn considers that the idea of Western
civilization” was constructed on this basis, and was particularly dear to English
philosophers of the Victorian period. They claimed that Western civilization had its roots
in Ancient Greece and Rome, namely in attributes such as: the rule of law, democracy,
the appeal of science and art. These attributes were disregarded in the Middle Ages and
then recuperated, first, during the Renaissance and, second, by the Enlightenment, and
then formed the basis of the political and cultural system of the nineteenth-century
British Empire. Quinn argues that this conception of “civilization” also made it possible to
create hierarchies between civilizations whereby some are viewed as being more apt for
development than others, and “Westerners” are presented as superior. Thus, European
technological advances of the nineteenth century were retroactively explained in
civilizational terms, that is, Europe led because it had endogenous attributes originating
in Ancient Greece and Rome that favoured this development. For example, in 1896,
Arthur Evans, head of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, who oversaw the archaeological
excavations of “Minoan” ruins, extolled Crete, calling it “the champion of the European
spirit against the yoke of Asia” (page 27).
This view of humanity divided into perfectly demarcated civilizations was recently revived
by Samuel Huntington in his book The Clash of Civilizations (1999). In this, Huntington
argues that, in the post-Cold War period, the wars of the future will not occur between
states but between monolithic and homogeneous “civilizations,” such as the “Western,”
the “Islamic,” the “African” or the “Sinic” (Chinese).
According to Quinn, any of these conceptions of civilization are incorrect because they
are not supported by historical facts. She develops her argument by analysing the case
of the West. First, the author argues that there are no “civilizations.” The idea that
humans organize themselves into broad clusters with specific characteristics that
consolidate over time is not a viable one. Nothing occurs spontaneously nor exclusively
endogenously. Everything arises as a result of interactions and influences. This means
that creating distinctions and specificities is useless. Secondly, and following on from the
previous point, the author argues that what might be considered Western in the case of
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 15 N.º 2
November 2024-April 2025, pp. 500-504
Critical Review Josephine Quinn (2024). How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year
History. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN (hb): 978-1-5266-0518-4
Daniel Cardoso
503
Greece and Rome was already being practised in other places, or else became established
there as a result of influences from elsewhere. Hence the title of the book; the West was
not created by Greece or Rome, but by the world. Quinn presents numerous examples
of this dynamic. The alphabet and numerals, already mentioned above, are two
instances. But there are many more. Legal codes came from Babylon, irrigation from
Assyria, the art of navigation from the Phoenicians, and the wheel came from the Central
Asian steppes. Religion, in the Greek case, is of Eastern origin. Even in the case of
democracy, the author shows how this form of governance first appeared in Assyria
around the 11th century BC. There, holders of public office were selected by a public
lottery that included all citizens, any of whom could be given this responsibility. This form
also eventually became established in Athens.
For all these reasons, an analysis of history based on the idea of civilization is reductive
according to Quinn, because it tends to obscure contacts between peoples over the
centuries, through which that history was made and evolved. The “West” and other social
spaces are places of aggregation and hybridity, with an extensive range of objects and
artefacts that negate the notion of an organic, pure or essential culture.
Despite the important contribution made by the book there are some limitations. The
lack of a conclusion means that there is no development of the theoretical ideas in the
introduction in the light of the empirical data explored in the chapters. The analysis is
short, which makes it more difficult to apply to the present day situation and other
moments in history. Some questions that remain unanswered are: has the emergence of
the modern state and capitalism reduced the space for heterogeneity? Can this
interaction-based approach be applied to other groups that we have also called
“civilizations,” such as the Chinese, Aztec or Mayan? If so, how? What motivates
interactions? Human nature, circumstances, other reasons?
In addition, the conclusions reached by the author are not actually new. Many scholars
of post-colonial thought have challenged civilizational thinking. One of the most
emblematic examples being Edward Said's book Orientalism (2021), in which the
American-Palestinian philosopher deconstructs West-East binarism. Other authors
pursuing this line of thought have demonstrated how the “non-Western world” has
historically been a space of technological, social and political innovation. Examples
include The Silk Roads (2018) by Peter Frankopan and The Once and Future World Order
(in press) by Amitav Acharya.
Nevertheless, what makes the author's contribution significant is the scope of her
historical survey, which is mostly based on primary sources. This book will make it even
more difficult to argue the existence of a pure, distinct Western civilization with direct
roots in Ancient Greece and Rome. Quinn’s book is also particularly relevant in view of
the political moment in which we live. At a time when nativisms and chauvinisms
propagated by the far right are gaining momentum all over the world, Quinn's book shows
that it is in diversity and the interaction between peoples from different backgrounds that
the world advances and that history is made. The people of antiquity understood this and
it is up to us to honour that memory.
JANUS.NET, e-journal of International Relations
e-ISSN: 1647-7251
VOL 15 N.º 2
November 2024-April 2025, pp. 500-504
Critical Review Josephine Quinn (2024). How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year
History. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN (hb): 978-1-5266-0518-4
Daniel Cardoso
504
References
Acharya, A. (in press). The Once and Future World Order: Why Global Civilization Will
Survive the Decline of the West. Basic Books.
Frankopan, P. (2018). As rotas da seda: Uma nova história do mundo. Relógio D'Água.
Huntington, S. P. (1999). O choque das civilizações e a mudança na ordem mundial.
Gradiva.
Kipling, R. (1899). The white man’s burden: The United States and the Philippine Islands.
The Kipling Society. https://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poem/poems_burden.htm
Quinn, J. (2017). In search of the Phoenicians. Princeton University Press.
Quinn, J. (2024). How the World Made the West. A 4,000-Year History. Bloomsbury
Publishing
Rostow, W. W. (1991). The Stages of Economic Growth: A non-communist
manifesto (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, E. (2021). Orientalismo. Edições 70.
How to cite this critical review
Cardoso, Daniel (2024). Recensão Crítica Josephine Quinn (2024). How the World Made the West:
A 4,000-Year History. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN (hb): 978-1-5266-0518-4. Critical Review,
Janus.net, e-journal of international relations. VOL 15, N.º 2, November 2024-April 2025, pp. 500-
504. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.15.01.2.